application essay search and seizure assignment

Search, Seizure, arrest, and reasonableness Essay

Introduction, search and seizures.

Search, seizure, arrest, and reasonableness have been controversial topics in the criminal justice system for a number of years. Interferences with individuals’ privacy expectations have been cited as the major undoing of the criminal justice system. This essay provides an in-depth analysis of the United State searches, seizures, arrests, and reasonableness.

A search is a meaningful interference or intrusion into individual privacy (Waksman & Goodman, 2010). It is premised on collection of evidence in pursuance of criminal activity. Searches can be with or without warrants. Under the federal law, an enforcement officer must obtain a search warrant issued to intrude person’s privacy.

However, searches can be without a warrant on the probable causal basis. This is because a federal law enforcing officer may believe that there is no enough time to obtain a warrant to conduct searches for evidence without it (Waksman & Goodman, 2010).

Seizures are divided into two namely; the seizures of property and seizures of individuals. A property seizure is the meaningful interference of a person’s possessory interest in his or her property (Zalman, 2011). The government can make an individual reasonably believe that he or she cannot go about his or her business, with the view of ongoing incident circumstances (Zalman, 2011). The seizure of an individual may include a full arrest, detentions on investigation, checkpoint inquiries, or detentions against the will (Zalman, 2011).

Search or seizure warrants are issued by a judge or a magistrate if there is a fair probability that the search and seizure will produce beneficial evidence for the wrongdoing (Zalman, 2011). The Fourth Amendment provides warrant-less searches in cases where the warrant clause takes precedence over reasonableness provision.

A reasonableness clause protects a person’s right to privacy. A reasonable search and seizure warrants must specifically describe the place to be searched, and the property to be seized. Furthermore, a warrant may also be issued for the property designed and intended for use or used in committing a wrongdoing.

According to Waksman and Goodman (2010), a search or a seizure warrant can be issued to officers to allow them arrest individuals found guilty. Reasonable warrants must be supported by probable cause for a search or seizure of a property, or a person. This is to protect citizens against arbitrary violation of their rights, by the government. Reasonableness also plays an important role in restraining the federal government’s action against the aliens.

The action that the government takes and the individuals’ expectations determine the action against the aliens. This implies that if the court determines that the government intrusion is unreasonably relative to the person’s protected privacy, then the violation has occurred. Once a reasonable interference with a person’s privacy expectation is established, the law enforcing officer is allowed to obtain a warrant that allows a federal law officer to intrude upon a person’s privacy (Waksman & Goodman, 2010).

Warrants are also executed through arrests. In the criminal justice system, arrests take place when a person is taken into custody by a police officer (Zalman, 2011). The criminal justice system starts with the arrests of criminals by the federal officers. The most common arrest is where police arrest individuals after finding them committing a crime.

Secondly, it can be a probable cause arrest if there is evidence to prove that one got involved, or is about to get involved in criminal activities. The federal law enforcing officer can also obtain an arrest warrant from a judge or migrate to affect the arrest. Finally, a search or seizure warrant can also prompt an arrest.

Stop and frisk, the most controversial criminal procedures instructed by police officers, is a form of search that is based on unreasoned suspicion that focuses on averting a crime (Waksman & Goodman, 2010). It may be carried out in search of weapons from an individual.

On the other hand, an automobile search is carried out when an officer relies on probable cause, to believe that evidence can be obtained from a person’s vehicle. Policemen do not require obtaining a court warrant to search or seizure the vehicle (Waksman & Goodman, 2010).

Border and regulatory searches are exempted from the Fourth Amendment warrant and probable cause requirements (Vina, 2006). Routine stops and searches at the U.S borders do not necessarily require warrants or probable cause. This is justified by the need of the government, to protect itself, its property, and citizens.

This is done through inspection of property and individuals, entering and leaving the country. However, reasonableness applies to the border and regulation searches. Border searches can be categorized into two groups. These include reasonable routine searches and non-routine searches that require reasonable suspicion (Vina, 2006).

The Fourth Amendment provides searches and seizures that aim at achieving effective administration of criminal justice in the United States. Moreover, it includes reasonableness in the criminal justice system, to safeguard the privacy rights of individuals. Searches and seizures need to be reasonable, in order to establish an expectation of privacy and meaningful interference. Regardless of areas, searches and seizures must be reasonable.

Vina, S., R. (2006). Protecting our Perimeter:” Border Searches” Under the Fourth Amendment , Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service . Web.

Waksman, D. M., & Goodman, D., J. (2010). The search and seizure handbook . Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.

Zalman, M. (2011). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society . Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, January 17). Search, Seizure, arrest, and reasonableness. https://ivypanda.com/essays/search-seizure-arrest-and-reasonableness/

"Search, Seizure, arrest, and reasonableness." IvyPanda , 17 Jan. 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/search-seizure-arrest-and-reasonableness/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'Search, Seizure, arrest, and reasonableness'. 17 January.

IvyPanda . 2019. "Search, Seizure, arrest, and reasonableness." January 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/search-seizure-arrest-and-reasonableness/.

1. IvyPanda . "Search, Seizure, arrest, and reasonableness." January 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/search-seizure-arrest-and-reasonableness/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Search, Seizure, arrest, and reasonableness." January 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/search-seizure-arrest-and-reasonableness/.

• The Mitchell's Case Analysis
• How Canada's Supreme Court Affected Administrative Law Principles
• Increasing the Rates of Crimes in Modern World
• Pre-trial Procedures in Criminal Cases
• Planning and Reviewing of an Identity Theft Case
• Fraud Detection and Investigation
• Criminal Arrest in Brooklyn on 13 March 2011
• Types of Crime Analysis

Search And Seizure - List of Free Essay Examples And Topic Ideas

Search and Seizure refers to the practice by law enforcement of searching persons, premises, or vehicles for evidence of crimes and the confiscation of evidence found. Essays might discuss the legal principles surrounding search and seizure, the Fourth Amendment in the US context, notable court cases, and the impact of these practices on justice and civil liberties. A substantial compilation of free essay instances related to Search And Seizure you can find at Papersowl. You can use our samples for inspiration to write your own essay, research paper, or just to explore a new topic for yourself.

The First Amendment

The First Amendment does not protect all forms of speech. Although its protections are incredibly diverse and broad, the First Amendment does not protect forms of speech including: “obscenity, fighting words, defamation (including libel and slander), child pornography, perjury, blackmail, incitement to imminent lawless action, true threats, and solicitations to commit crimes” (Freedom Forum Institute, 1). The incorporation doctrine is a constitutional doctrine establishing the Bill of Rights (amendments 1-10) as fundamental rights guaranteed in both federal and state court […]

Constitution of the United States and the Fourth Amendment

The method by which law enforcement should treat people is based on the Bill of Rights section of the Constitution of the United States. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable search by law enforcement. Police must show evidence, that a threat to public safety exists, and probable cause that a crime is, or will be, committed for courts to issue a search warrant. The details of the what, where, when and whom they are searching must be provided. Items […]

The U.S. Constitution

The constitution of the United States was written on the 17th of September in1778, during a convention held in Philadelphia. This was very successful since the government of America and its fundamental laws were established.  An increase in Federal authority and basic rights for the Americans was guaranteed through the U.S constitution. Initially, the US government was weak and each state was independently operating like a country.  The new government was modified to have three main branches with several balances […]

We will write an essay sample crafted to your needs.

Elements of Constitutional Law

The four elements of arrest are intent, authority, detention or seizure, and understanding. The rationale of a regulation enforcement officer to arrest a suspect can both be transmitted verbally or thru actions. This is very sizable due to the fact the absence of cause means that no arrest can take vicinity. The intent is a subjective time making it tough to at instances determine if a regulation enforcement officer had intentions of making the arrest. Within the event that cause […]

Identifying the Role of Leadership

Three officers Darryl Forrest, Jeffrey Bell, and Dustin Sillings, working with the Selective Crime Occurrence Reduction Enforcement (SCORE) unit of the Kansas City, Kansas (KCK) Police Department were indicted in July 2011. They were charged with stealing money as well as personal property in the homesteads where they were serving search warrants (KCTV5 News, 2011). By doing so, they violated the people's constitutional freedom from unreasonable searches, seizures, and deprivation of property with no due process by acting under color […]

Balancing Liberty: the Intricacies of Search and Seizure

In the intricate tapestry of justice and individual rights, few threads are as finely woven as the concept of search and seizure. Like the ebb and flow of tides, it represents the delicate balance between the powers of law enforcement and the sanctity of personal privacy. Within this dynamic interplay lies a narrative as old as the legal traditions themselves, tracing its roots back through the annals of history to the foundations of common law. Embedded within the fabric of […]

Balancing Liberty: the Complexity of Search and Seizure Laws

In the intricate mosaic of legal doctrines guiding the conduct of justice, few principles spark as much debate and contention as the concept of search and seizure. Nurtured within the fabric of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, these laws stand as sentinels against undue encroachment by the state into the private realms of individuals. Yet, the interpretation and application of these laws remain a perennial source of discourse, as the scales tip between the imperatives of law […]

Balancing Tech Innovation with Privacy Rights in Law Enforcement

In the digital age, technological advancements have revolutionized the way law enforcement agencies conduct searches and seizures, raising significant privacy concerns. These advancements, while enhancing the capabilities to investigate and prevent crime, also tread into complex territories of individual privacy rights. This essay delves into the impacts of these technologies, including digital privacy issues, electronic surveillance, GPS tracking, and the utilization of drones and other surveillance technologies, alongside the ongoing debates over privacy rights versus government surveillance. As we navigate […]

Legal Nuances in Search and Seizure: Navigating Challenges and Defenses

In the intricate ballet of jurisprudence, the notions of exploration and confiscation emerge as pivotal components that frequently challenge the equilibrium between individual freedoms and communal security. Central to this legal arena are the suppression actions initiated by defendants, which are grounded in assertions of Fourth Amendment entitlements infringements. This constitutional bulwark is crafted to shield individuals from unreasonable scrutinies and seizures by law enforcement entities, ensuring the preservation of every citizen's solitude in accordance with legal statutes. A critical […]

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

• Free Samples
• Premium Essays
• Editing Services Editing Proofreading Rewriting
• Extra Tools Essay Topic Generator Thesis Generator Citation Generator GPA Calculator Study Guides Donate Paper
• Essay Writing Help
• About Us About Us Testimonials FAQ
• Studentshare
• Law of Evidence: Search and Seizure

Law of Evidence: Search and Seizure - Assignment Example

• Subject: Law
• Type: Assignment
• Level: High School
• Pages: 1 (250 words)
• Downloads: 2
• Author: gregstroman

Extract of sample "Law of Evidence: Search and Seizure"

Evidence and Law Definition Search is explained as scrutinizing a person’s grounds to look for verification of any criminal engagement. Seizure from a law perspective can be referred as compulsory attaining of possessions by enforcement of government ruling from an individual suspected to be violating or is known as a lawbreaker. Probable Cause is reasonable belief level, based on expressed facts, that is essential to litigate an individual in civil court or to apprehend and impeach a person in criminal court.

Standing is the right to file an appeal or a grievance under situations.Search warrant on AK47 Assault RifleThere are instances when an individual might be excempted from the fourth amendment that warrants a search of any malicious activity and weapons search as AK47 assault riffle. They would have to prove that it is a breach of privacy as the law states that if the individual knowingly shows to the public that the property is exposed in homes or office. This means that if the place in the house that is to be searched is not exposed then it does not have to be searched.

Procedure of Search WarrantThe selected AFP Executing Officer is the person accountable for planning and implementing the search warrant. Two of the AFP officers should be there for the process of execution unless the person residing in the premises has offered prearranged approval for the implementation of warrant. Where applicable, the role of AFP should be limited to one of an executing officer and sufficient AFP members to guarantee suppression and safety at the grounds and not execute the responsibility of property officer or searchers.

The implementing AFP officer verifies the number of agency legislative body required to do the search. The executing officer will determine the person to be certified as a constable supporting for the search warrant. The search warrant is implemented in agreement to the regular AFP measures. Work CitedKeane, Adrian. The Modern Law of Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.

• Cited: 0 times
• Copy Citation Citation is copied Copy Citation Citation is copied Copy Citation Citation is copied

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Law of Evidence: Search and Seizure

From arrest to adjudication, search and seizures, search and seizures, james smith, searches and seizures, the fourth amendment, search and seizure, supreme court of the us, private search and seizure and the fourth amendment.

• TERMS & CONDITIONS
• PRIVACY POLICY
• COOKIES POLICY

• Environment
• Information Science
• Social Issues
• Argumentative
• Cause and Effect
• Classification
• Compare and Contrast
• Descriptive
• Exemplification
• Informative
• Controversial
• Exploratory
• What Is an Essay
• Length of an Essay
• Generate Ideas
• Types of Essays
• Structuring an Essay
• Outline For Essay
• Essay Introduction
• Thesis Statement
• Body of an Essay
• Writing a Conclusion
• Essay Writing Tips
• Drafting an Essay
• Revision Process
• Fix a Broken Essay
• Format of an Essay
• Essay Examples
• Essay Checklist
• Essay Writing Service
• Pay for Research Paper
• Write My Research Paper
• Write My Essay
• Custom Essay Writing Service
• Admission Essay Writing Service
• Pay for Essay
• Academic Ghostwriting
• Write My Book Report
• Case Study Writing Service
• Dissertation Writing Service
• Coursework Writing Service
• Lab Report Writing Service
• Do My Assignment
• Buy College Papers
• Capstone Project Writing Service
• Buy Research Paper
• Custom Essays for Sale

Can’t find a perfect paper?

• Free Essay Samples

Search and Seizure

Updated 18 August 2023

Downloads 28

Category Crime ,  Law

Topic Police

The Fourth Amendment which is contained in the United States Constitution has put in place restrictions on the scope duties of Law Enforcement Officers regarding arrests of suspects, confiscation of illegal items such as illegal weapons and drugs and searches of both people and their property. This research focuses on circumstances under which a Law Enforcement Officer can search a person, their place of business or home and confiscation of their property. The reason why I have chosen to write about this topic is to help people be aware of their rights, and the measures that they can take when they find themselves or their property being searched by Law Enforcement Officers. Law Enforcement Officers are violating the Fourth Amendment rights of a lot of people, and this research will help people know what steps to take when anyone working in Law Enforcement contacts them.

Individuals without knowledge make themselves be subjected to unnecessary or unlawful searches and at the end get arrested by an ardent Officer of the Law. The Constitution of the United States that: people have the right to feel secure by themselves, papers, houses, personal effects, against irrelevant search and seizures, shall not face violation of their rights. It also states that warrants should be issued only with probable cause and supported by affirmation or Oath, especially offering the description of a place to be searched, and the individuals or things that will be seized ("Fourth Amendment - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw", 2018).

Many citizens, however, are unaware or are not knowledgeable in regards to their Fourth Amendment rights making a lot of law enforcement officers take advantage of them due to their lack of knowledge. I have seen situations whereby a lot of people giving up their Fourth Amendment Rights not knowing. Some time ago I saw a black man walking on a street minding his own business at around two in the morning. A police officer stopped him and started asking him where he was headed. After speaking briefly, the police officer decided to search him, and in his front pocket, he found a small bag containing marijuana. The police officer arrested the black male for being in possession of marijuana, and he was taken to jail. Eventually, the case was dismissed because the police officer had carried out an unreasonable search.

The Fifth Amendment was created on 2nd March 1963. It is when Ernesto Miranda, a male faced arrest because of rape. He was automatically assumed to be guilty due to a prior conviction of being a peeping Tom. At the time, the victim could not properly identify him as the person who had raped her. The police disregarded this fact and arrested and took him in for questioning whereby he confessed, and they charged him. Ernesto Miranda had a change of mind when he realized he did not have to speak to the police in the first place and he recanted his confession.

Using the same concept as search and seizure, a police officer will use the lack of knowledge of a citizen to their advantage. When he spoke to the law enforcement officers, Miranda permitted the police officers to search him, and he unknowingly gave them access to information which would have allowed them to search his house and any other property that he might be linked to. Speaking to law enforcement officers can be a bad move if one does not know the law and how it works. People sometimes put themselves in situations which can make them be put under searches or be jailed. One should first ask the police officer why they are being arrested before agreeing to go to the police station. Most crimes remain unsolved because police officers simply make arrests without carrying out thorough investigations. Even though the Fourth Amendment protects people from searches and seizures which are without reasonable cause, there are avenues created by the court which have given police officers ways of gaining evidence that is why “NOT ALL SEARCHES NEED A SEARCH WARRANT TO BE CARRIED OUT.” There are many situations which police officers do not need a search warrant to search people or property. Listed below are some of these instances:

1. Exigent circumstances

These are situations whereby the police officers have the belief that if they go through the process of applying for a warrant, it will delay the search leading to frustration in searching (Schmerber). Cops have the right to enter an area or a building if they are made aware of a crime in progress. These are in circumstances whereby waiting for a search warrant may result in great harm or death of the person being assaulted.

2. Hot pursuit

            If cops are chasing a culprit into building or sites, they may search beyond the necessary places to locate the suspect (Hayden). Hot pursuit is defined as the pursuing of a suspect by an officer of the law (who may or may not have a warrant). It aims to prevent the suspect from escaping or to try to apprehend any individual who is under suspicion of trying to commit or having committed a felony, or misdemeanor. Hot pursuit should be carried out with no delay but the pursuit does not need to be immediate.

Hot pursuit may also refer to the chasing of a suspect or a felon who has escaped into a neighboring jurisdiction in cases of emergency where one does not have the time to alert the law enforcement in the area.

3. Pat down / Frisking

It is done in situations whereby the police have the suspicion (reasonable) that a suspect may be armed or engaged in crime. The Law Enforcement Officers are allowed by the law to pat down a suspect’s outer clothing in search of weapons. While conducting a frisk search, police have the permission of the law to turn out pockets or reach into clothing layers ONLY when patting down the suspect they encountered something that could be considered as a weapon. If the possible weapon is found to be other criminal evidence (for example drugs), it is considered as admissible. If the object, however, is a box that may hold criminal evidence the police most likely would not have the power to open it.

4. Plain view

If a police officer in his line of duty was, for example, placing a parking ticket on a driver’s windshield and saw a bomb inside the car, he has a right to search the car and confiscate any evidence inside the car. Another example is if police were happening to be driving by a house and heard a crime taking place, they had permission to enter the property and conduct a search. If, however, they noticed a crime taking place because they were trespassing, the evidence gathered would be thrown out by a court of law unless they had due reason to be there (such as if they had a warrant).

An officer can ask a suspect for permission to search him/her, and if they do grant it and they find any contraband, they can make an arrest.

While conducting this research, I found:

Search and seizure issues contained in the Fourth Amendment. The topics I would like to cover relate to the Constitution and Search and Seizure:

a. The role that search and seizure play in criminal investigations.

b. Foundations of Search and Seizure that are in the English common law and the United States Constitution (Fourth Amendment).

c. Parts of search and seizure termed as problematic.

The Bill of Rights contained in the Fourth Amendment states that “people have the right to feel secure in their homes, papers, alone, effects and be protected from unreasonable searches and seizure, violation, issue of unnecessary warrants without reasonable cause.” Lawrence Tribe points out that this Amendment is the most fundamental and source of the protected rights that a person has. The courts state that police officers have severe restrictions to protect people from searches and seizures that are unreasonable.

Search, and seizures can be divided into two categories: searches that require a warrant and those that do not require a warrant. The United States Supreme Court prefers that all searches are conducted with a warrant. The courts, however, do logically allow under “exigent circumstances” police officers to carry out warrantless searches. Reid states that these circumstances are “few, tailored for specific circumstances and also well delineated.” Searches that are made with or without warrants must have “probable cause.” A magistrate or judge determines in the former case while a cop does in the latter. If the matter proceeds to court, a judge is asked to rule if probable cause was in play. The courts have in most cases are biased in regards to the review of warrants which are issued by a magistrate and the behavior of the police while in the field. Magistrates and judges are considered to be more impartial than the police. It is why that when the police act on their own without having a warrant that they are considered to have acted without probable cause.

The “exclusionary rule” is used when a search is considered to be illegal. It means that a specific part of the evidence that was gotten through, for instance, an improper search is considered to be tainted hence the prosecution cannot use it. In search and seizures, it has become the most controversial part. That is why most defendants walk away scot-free because of “a technicality.” Its scope does have limitations because it only applies to pieces of evidence that are tainted. Very few cases which are brought in front of the prosecution are dependent on only one piece of evidence. Freidrich notes that it is only in rare circumstances whereby a criminal who is obviously guilty can go scot free due to the exclusionary rule being applied.

Moreover, a lot of people have argued that although the exclusionary principle has its flaws, it is by far the best way of accomplishing an important agenda which is putting a leash on police misconduct. Very few people agree that the police do not need any oversight. The reason for the existence of probable cause, search and seizure, and the exclusionary rule is that they all prevent the police from acting in improper ways. It is here that some people have reasoned they encounter instances whereby the statutory law has become inadequate. It is because the statutory law has become more political according to how it is created than how it operates as a law. Steiler states that “history has shown us over and over the political process will not put in place structures that can prevent police misconduct thus the exclusionary rules have helped bring in the courts to enforce the law.”

It is wise to note that search and seizure, in theory, might not be prominent in the whole of the American court system. Most criminal prosecutions occur in state and not federal courts. Before 1961, the state officers did not have to abide by the exclusionary rule if they had not met the standards. However, in the case of Mapp v. Ohio, the United States Supreme Court in June 1961 decided by a vote of 5-3-1 to uphold the Fourth Amendment protections which would be used in all criminal prosecutions. The Mapp v. Ohio was a landmark case since the extension broadened the areas where search and seizure could be used.

It should be stated as a by the way that there are classes of searches which are not at all categorized under the sphere of criminal searches. Administrative searches for example conducting airline searches, and health and safety inspections of buildings do not involve solving crimes. Warrants are however required because an invasion of privacy does happen while searches are being carried out. What is termed as probable cause for warrants of this type is relatively whole areas and not specific buildings that can be stated in the warrant.

Returning to the prevention of improper searches and seizures, the prohibitions and application of the exclusionary rule have highly impacted the conduct of the police force in a directly and indirectly. One can make a distinction between police searches and forms of searches which occur because of “exigent circumstances” that “may make accessing a warrant useless.” It is in cases such as search of automobiles before they are allowed to leave or taken away from a scene. Other cases are when warrantless searches are carried out on people to effect the self-preservation of police officers and prevent a crime from taking place.

An “investigation” can be categorized as a process which is more formal compared to an ad hoc search conducted on a person in the field. It will most likely need a warrant and certainly needs inhibitions on the conduct of the police. Any police officer would list search and seizure, a possibility of an appeal of the exclusionary rule, and probable cause all have a huge and direct implication on how police investigations are to be carried out. The same would apply to a warrantless search under carried out in emergency circumstances but it is not as in the same category as a restriction placed on police investigations that are much more formal. It is because much of the criminal evidence is gotten through formal investigations and inhibitions effected on investigations will affect more cases than restrictions that are enforced on warrantless searches.

Investigations are also affected indirectly. Schwartz quotes the Chief Justice Warren Burger as speaking of “the huge price we incur for the exclusionary rule that we have imprisoned ourselves in.” Tucker has argued that a part of this “monstrous price” is not that but also sometimes the guilty walk away free. However, according to the interpretations of both the “Fourth and Fifth Amendments which are now in effect, a situation has come in place whereby the police are restricted in their work. The Fourth Amendment forbids issuing of warrants while having no probable cause. Tucker further argues that the police cannot make a negative interpretation (which they must often make if they need to “have” a probable cause) when a suspect does not want to answer questions that are contained in the Fifth Amendment. If the police officers cannot make such an interpretation, then “If a suspect refuses to explain the circumstances, there may be no grounds needed for opening of an investigation.” If Tucker’s deductions are correct, a decrease in police efficiency has occurred because of the juxtapositions contained in the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

Eskridge has made a note of the retreat of the post-Warren Supreme Court from its position on the Warren Court. He has also noted that in the Post-Mapp environment there has been an emphasis on dealing with the issues of police misconduct by managerial rulemaking. The problem with this approach is that it does not have the character of strength of having a judge or magistrate rule probable cause. If, as mentioned in the above case, statutory law is very fundamentally political to fully deal with police misconduct when it arises then instances whereby the police force is expected to tackle such situations by itself would not be effective. The advantage of the situation currently is that it is an impartial person who is responsible for determining what falls under adequate grounds to make valid a search.

Akhil Amar who is a professor of law at Yale has proposed another solution that makes his argument the most interesting so far. He makes the note that search and seizure was not fully Madison’s idea, but instead, it came from the English case law. Amar has stated that Madison might have been influenced by Wilkes v. Wood which occurred in 1763. The case involved general warrants that were used to get into the house of a member of parliament and go through his papers just because he dared to disapprove of George III and his administration. Wilkes went to court to argue how the general warrants were used in his case and he triumphed. One should note that the general warrants used in Wilkes case were controversial and involved the use of prior restraint. It is a procedure that had a common law against it and could be and was in fact aimed against specific acts of political action in England.

The interesting fact about the Wilkes case is that Wilkes emerged victoriously. He won against the official who had authorized the general warrant, he was awarded compensation because of the search and seizure, and punitive damages were imposed to discourage misconduct of that sort in the nearby future. Amar holds the belief that the Fourth Amendment was designed to deter police misconduct and at the time of its writing, it was a function of the civil courts. Amar argues that Madison was not the pioneer of the exclusionary rule and that it should be done away with and alternatively replaced with statutes which would put in place a system whereby civil compensation against the police would be a way of discouraging improper searches. He believes the current Supreme Court would uphold the provision by a vote of 5-4.

As I earlier stated, this would be a good idea. Whether this would be politically possible is a question that cannot be answered. It should, however, be noted that there is huge dissatisfaction with the current interpretation of the Fourth Amendment. What is interesting in regards to Amar’s argument is that the framers had an agenda that was very different when compared to the exclusionary rule. They felt their status quo in regards to recovery of damages which included punitive damages through civil court action was enough to discourage police misconduct. It has not been effected in the modern times, and perhaps it should be.

Coming to an end, in the essay above I have to elaborate on some of the roles that search and seizure play in the conducting of criminal investigations. I have also discussed its origins from the Fourth Amendment and how it is currently applied in the collection of evidence. Lastly, I have discussed the dissatisfactions it has brought up and stated many suggestions that have arisen as to how things may be done in a different and better way.

Understanding Search-and-Seizure Law. (2018). www.nolo.com. Retrieved 5 April 2018, from https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/search-seizure-criminal-law-30183.html

Fourth Amendment - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw. (2018). Findlaw. Retrieved 5 April 2018, from http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment4.html

Hot Pursuit Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.. (2018). Definitions.uslegal.com. Retrieved 5 April 2018, from https://definitions.uslegal.com/h/hot-pursuit/

McKenzie, B. (2018). 13 Legal Warrantless Searches in the United States. Superhero Nation: how to write superhero novels, comic books and superhero books. Retrieved 5 April 2018, from http://www.superheronation.com/2011/05/03/12-legal-warrantless-searches/

The Miranda rights are established - Jun 13, 1966 - HISTORY.com. (2018). HISTORY.com. Retrieved 5 April 2018, from https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-miranda-rights-are-established

Deadline is approaching?

Wait no more. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Related Essays

Related topics.

Find Out the Cost of Your Paper

Type your email

By clicking “Submit”, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy policy. Sometimes you will receive account related emails.

Writing: Get your essay and assignment written from scratch by PhD expert

Rewriting: Paraphrase or rewrite your friend's essay with similar meaning at reduced cost

Editing: Proofread your work by experts and improve grade at Lowest cost

Enter phone no. to receive critical updates and urgent messages !

Error goes here

Please upload all relevant files for quick & complete assistance.

New User? Start here.

How Does Search and Seizure Relate to California v. Greenwood?

Understanding the trial process.

How Does Search and Seizure Relate to California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988). The ability to think critically is a key skill for success in the criminal justice field. It means not taking what you heard or read at face value, but using your critical thinking faculties to weigh up the evidence, and consider the implications and conclusions of the situation.

Resource: Chapter 10: “Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial” Watch the video of a Mock Trial Flow to understand how a mock trial is conducted and follow this criteria in creating the trial for the assignment. Texas Y&G Training Videos (Producer). (2014, October 9).

Example mock trial flow. [Video Podcast.]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtQDOQM4dM8 Review the details of California v. Greenwood. Compile the facts and witness information for this case. Decide which witnesses could support the prosecution’s case and which witnesses would support the defense’s case. How does search and seizure relate to the California v. Greenwood case?

Review the Following Resources: JUSTIA US Supreme Court. (2020). California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/486/35/ Florida Supreme Court. (n.d.). The trash search: Fourth amendment: United States constitution. https://www.floridasupremecourt.org/content/download/241730/2135211/TrashSearch06.pdf Listen to the audio of the oral argument of California v. Greenwood. Oyez. (n.d.). California v. Greenwood: Oral Argument - January 11, 1988. https://www.oyez.org/cases/1987/86-684

Law Library - American Law and Legal Information. (2020). California v. Greenwood: Significance. https://law.jrank.org/pages/24099/California-v-Greenwood-Significance.html Westlaw. (2020). California V. Greenwood.

Note: You should be logged in to Westlaw in the Purdue Global Library before you access the link above. Write a 350- to 700-word essay describing the trial process.

Include the following in your essay: A description of the trial process Examples of opening and closing statements The types of questions asked on direct examination Highlight important points for cross-examination.

Most college and university students deal with writing a thousand-word essay. Basically, writing a

Writing an essay is a common task in high school, college, and university assignments. It is a

Don't know about essay outlines? If not, you are not doing anything right. An outline is essentiall

Students in their academic journeys often get tasks to craft essays on a wide range of topics i

Custom Essay Writing Service

• How it works

Search and Seizure BIblical worldview (English standard version,2001) Overview The application essay assignments address topics integral to

Search and Seizure BIblical worldview (English standard version,2001)  Overview

The application essay assignments address topics integral to the criminal justice field and future criminal justice professionals from a biblical worldview. As societal change compels criminal justice reform, studying the effects of reform related to justice from a biblical worldview is essential. Rethinking law enforcement procedures, criminal sentencing, and law, overall, are just a few of the topics examined.

Instructions

·         In your essay, support your views with the required readings and study materials for this week, or other scholarly articles published within the last five years to support your statements.

·     Four in-text citations are required for this assignment in current APA formatting.

·    Your paper must be formatted using 12 pt. Times New Roman font, with a 400-word minimum/425-word maximum double-spaced.o         Assignment questions, title page, and reference section will be excluded from the word count.

Recognizing that a just criminal justice system has limited power and upholds the unalienable rights of the citizenry,   following scenario:

You are a police officer, and you are dispatched to a noise complaint at a residence in your jurisdiction. When you arrive at the residence, you hear loud music coming from the house that would constitute a violation of the noise ordinance in your community. You do not get an answer when you knock on the front door, so you walk around to the back of the house. When you get to the back porch, you see what you recognize to be several marijuana plants based on your training and experience. As you are examining the plants, the resident comes to the door and begins yelling at you to “get off of my property.” Note: for the purposes of this scenario, assume you are in a state where marijuana, medicinal or otherwise, is not legal.

Based on this information, respond to the following questions:

1.        Can you seize the marijuana plants at that time? If yes, what is your legal justification for doing so? If no, what legally prohibits you from doing so? What biblical principles should you be considering?

2.        Based on your observation of the marijuana plants, do you need a search warrant to enter and search the house and the resident? If yes, what is the basis for this legal requirement? If no, what is the justification for this exception to the search warrant requirement? What biblical principles should you be considering?

3.        If you enter the residence and seize additional evidence inside and that search and seizure is later deemed illegal, would the additional evidence be admissible in court? Why or why not? What legal ruling(s) should you be considering?

Order Plagiarism-Free Paper

Explore More topics

Order for an original customized paper.

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

• Essay Database >
• Essay Examples >
• Essays Topics >
• Essay on Vehicles

Search And Seizures Essay Sample

Type of paper: Essay

Topic: Vehicles , New York , Actions , Union , Activity , Cars , Border , Automobile

Published: 02/20/2023

ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS

There are various actions that the authorities employ. Some of which include Stop-and-Frisk, the rules in automobile search, and the requirements in terms of regulatory and border searches, the purpose of this writing is to discuss the application as well as the issues that may have been associated with such terms. Stop-and-Frisk activity happens when the police officer randomly choose a vehicle on the street for random checking (New York Civil Liberties Union, n.d.). This activity can be applied to anyone, especially if there is an intelligence report about a crime. However, this activity is being criticized by many people, as there were many law-abiding citizens who were stopped and interrogated. Thus, most of the people who were being pulled over for questioning are members of minority groups. In relation to this, the automobile search rules must be applied at all times. On the other hand, it was stated that a vehicle may be stopped for random search without a warrant in various situations (Lemons, n.d.). For this automobile to become valid, there are two requirements that should be met. Firstly, there should be a probable cause in relation to the search procedure. Secondly, the search is valid if the vehicle must be readily mobile (Lemons, n.d.), meaning, that the vehicle must be ready to be moved any time after the search procedure. The third issue is the requirements when it comes to border and regulatory searches. This is applied during routine inspections as part of security measures. In general, it involves emptying the pockets of a person, without the suspicion of any criminal activity involvement (Vina, 2006). However, in the event that there is a reasonable suspicion towards any illegal activities, the authorities will anon-routine search on the borders.

Lemons, B. R. (n.d.). Searching a Vehicle Without a Warrant. Retrieved from https://www.fletc.gov/sites/default/files/imported_files/training/programs/legal-division/downloads-articles-and-faqs/research-by-subject/4th-amendment/searchingavehicle-carroll.pdf New York Civil Liberties Union. (n.d.). Stop and Frisk Practices | New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) - American Civil Liberties Union of New York State. Retrieved from http://www.nyclu.org/issues/racial-justice/stop-and-frisk-practices Vina, S. R. (2006). Protecting our perimeter: "border searches" under the Fourth Amendment (RL31826). Retrieved from Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress website: http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/library/P1075.pdf

Cite this page

Share with friends using:

Removal Request

Finished papers: 2491

This paper is created by writer with

ID 286968421

If you want your paper to be:

Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate

Original, fresh, based on current data

Eloquently written and immaculately formatted

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Get your papers done by pros!

Other Pages

Research paper on review of hendersons basic needs theory, sample report on the usage of wireless sensor network in er, good parkinsons disease research paper example, good the human computer interface essay example, good essay on character analysis for the book the things they carried by tim obrien, good example of essay on running a successful campaign 10 steps to a racism free america, good roman numerals research paper example, free violent computer games argumentative essay sample, free sustainable development critical thinking example, free research paper on children and ipads how are ipads iphones effecting childrens social skills, good example of devise deviser device devising and its variation of meaning in becketts literature review, example of essay on television and citizenship, organ transplant rejection research papers examples, essay on the capabilities of a newborn infant, geography tourism in molokai island research proposals examples, example of course work on strategic planning, good effective exchange rates neer and reer research paper example, free swot analysis of indian automotive industry case study sample, nurse staffing essay, google is making us stupid essays examples, crafting and executing strategy case study examples, present value essays examples, free analyzing quot the gleaners by millet banksy quot painting research paper sample, vyvanse essays, deter essays, enough money essays, sexual behavior essays, degrading essays, roman citizenship essays, global scale essays, health reform essays, positive and negative essays, broke down essays, gorilla movie reviews, brother in law movie reviews, thief movie reviews, admiral movie reviews, pastor movie reviews, sanctuary movie reviews, photographer movie reviews, mess movie reviews, patriot movie reviews.

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline