Logo

Essay on Effects Of Pollution On Animals

Students are often asked to write an essay on Effects Of Pollution On Animals in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Effects Of Pollution On Animals

Introduction.

Pollution is a big problem for our world. It not only affects people, but animals too. Different types of pollution harm animals in different ways. Let’s learn about how pollution affects animals.

Air Pollution

Air pollution is harmful to animals. It can cause lung problems and other health issues. Birds, for example, can have trouble flying because of the poor air quality. This makes it hard for them to find food and survive.

Water Pollution

Water pollution is another big issue. When harmful substances enter water bodies, they harm aquatic life. Fish and other water creatures can get sick or even die from the polluted water.

Land Pollution

Land pollution affects animals too. When we throw away trash, it can end up in places where animals live. They can get hurt by sharp objects or get stuck in plastic waste.

250 Words Essay on Effects Of Pollution On Animals

Pollution is harmful to everyone, including animals. It is caused by harmful substances released into the environment. This essay will explore how pollution affects animals.

Air pollution is very harmful to animals. It can cause breathing problems and diseases. For example, birds can get sick from polluted air, which can lead to their death.

Water pollution is another big problem for animals. When harmful substances get into water, they can poison animals that drink from or live in it. Fish, for instance, can die from polluted water, which affects the whole food chain.

Land pollution can also harm animals. When trash is not properly disposed of, animals can eat it and get sick. For example, a bird might mistake a piece of plastic for food and choke on it.

In conclusion, pollution has a big impact on animals. It can cause them to get sick or even die. We must do our part to reduce pollution and protect our animal friends.

500 Words Essay on Effects Of Pollution On Animals

Pollution is a big problem that affects all living beings on Earth. It is when harmful substances mix with the environment and cause damage. Animals, like humans, are victims of pollution. This essay will talk about the effects of pollution on animals.

Land pollution hurts animals in many ways. When we throw away trash like plastic, it can harm animals. Many animals mistake plastic for food and eat it. This can make them very sick or even cause death. Land pollution also destroys the homes of animals. When their homes are destroyed, animals have to find new places to live. This can be very hard and some animals may not survive.

Noise Pollution

Noise pollution is when there is too much noise in the environment. This can be very stressful for animals. It can scare them and make it hard for them to find food or a mate. Noise pollution can also hurt the ears of some animals, like bats and dolphins, that use sound to navigate.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Essay Service Examples Environment Air Pollution

Essay Effects of Air Pollution on Animals

Introduction

  • Proper editing and formatting
  • Free revision, title page, and bibliography
  • Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

document

  • Reduced fertility and birth defects
  • Developmental issues
  • Respiratory damage
  • Damage to neurological function
  • Weakening of the immune system

1. Supporting evidence

Increase in elderly and infant deaths, 1. respiratory system, 2. cardiovascular system., 3. nervous system, 2. supporting evidence, harm to animals.

  • By affecting the living quality of their environment or habitat
  • By affecting their food supply availability and quality

3. Supporting evidence

Damage to plant life.

Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

reviews

Cite this paper

Related essay topics.

Get your paper done in as fast as 3 hours, 24/7.

Related articles

Essay Effects of Air Pollution on Animals

Most popular essays

  • Air Pollution

In the day of development, the problem of air pollution is much concerned to a point where a wide...

  • Citizenship
  • Conservation of Forest
  • Conversation

WHO air quality model affirms that 90% of the total populace live in places where air quality...

  • Los Angeles

There is a major air pollution problem in California, especially in major cities such as Los...

  • Environmental Pollution
  • Fossil Fuels

Environmental pollution it is the entrance of any unwanted material into the natural environment,...

  • Greenhouse Gas

Robert Orben once said, “There's so much pollution in the air now that if it weren't for our lungs...

The impact that humans have on the environment includes changes to biophysical environments and...

  • Literature Review

Pollution is when a harmful substance is introduced to the environment causing damage to living...

  • Environmental Issues

Air pollution occurs when harmful substances are introduced into Earth’s atmosphere. Air pollution...

Air pollution is one of the major killers and a threat that affects everything around the world....

Join our 150k of happy users

  • Get original paper written according to your instructions
  • Save time for what matters most

Fair Use Policy

EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].

We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.

Provide your email, and we'll send you this sample!

By providing your email, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Say goodbye to copy-pasting!

Get custom-crafted papers for you.

Enter your email, and we'll promptly send you the full essay. No need to copy piece by piece. It's in your inbox!

Effects of Air Pollution

Air pollution affects all things. It is harmful to our health, and it impacts the environment by reducing visibility and blocking sunlight, causing acid rain, and harming forests, wildlife, and agriculture. Greenhouse gas pollution, the cause of climate change, affects the entire planet.

Harming Human Health

According to the World Health Organization , an estimated seven million people die each year from air pollution. More than 4,000 people died in just a few months due to a severe smog event that occurred in London in 1952. Ground-level ozone causes muscles in the lungs to contract, making it difficult to breathe. Exposure to high ozone levels can cause sore throat, coughing, lung inflammation, and permanent lung damage.

Diagram of the trachea, lungs, and bronchial tubes showing how ozone affects breathing. When air quality is good, normal lungs have wide open pathways for air and breathing is easy. When ozone levels are high, muscles in the bronchial tubes contract, the pathways for air are narrowed, and breathing is difficult.

Ozone pollution affects our lungs, making it difficult to breathe. UCAR

Symptoms from short-term exposure typically resolve quickly, but long term exposure is linked to serious illness and disease in multiple body systems. Children, the elderly, and people with ongoing illnesses are more vulnerable to air pollution than other groups. Urban populations are also at greater risk due to high concentrations of pollution within cities. Check the current air quality in your area to determine if you should take precautions such as reducing or avoiding outdoor activity.

Short-term exposure to air pollution can cause: Long-term exposure to air pollution can cause:

Harming Animals and Plants

Brown dots scattered across the surface of three green leaves of a potato plant.

Brown patches on these potato leaves are evidence of moderate ozone damage.

Danica Lombardozzi/NCAR

Wildlife can experience many of the same negative health effects of air pollution that humans do. Damage to respiratory systems is the most common effect on animals, but neurological problems and skin irritations are also common.

Plants and crops grow less when exposed to long-term air pollution. Ozone pollution harms plants by damaging structures called stomata, which are tiny pores on the underside of leaves that allow the plant to "breathe." Some types of plants can protect themselves by temporarily closing their stomata or producing antioxidants, but others are particularly sensitive to damage. Between 1980 and 2011, nine billion dollars-worth of soybeans and corn were lost in the US as a result of ozone pollution. When acid rain, lead toxicity, and exposure to nitrogen oxides change the chemical nature of the soil, plants are robbed of the nutrients that they need to grow and survive. This impacts agriculture, forests, and grasslands.

There are many other ways that air pollution affects living things, such as damaging the habitat, water, and food sources that plants and animals need to survive.

Causing Acid Rain

Stone features on a building are crumbling and damaged due to acid rain.

Acid rain damages buildings. UCAR/NAME

Burning fossil fuels releases sulfur and nitrogen oxides into the atmosphere. Acid rain forms when sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide mix with water droplets in the atmosphere to make sulfuric acid and nitric acid. Winds can carry these pollutants for thousands of miles, until they fall to the Earth's surface as acid rain, which damages the leaves of vegetation, increases the acidity of soils and water, and is linked to over 500 deaths each year. Buildings and other structures are also impacted by acid rain, which causes an estimated five billion dollars of property damage each year. Acid rain dissolves mortar between bricks, causes stone foundations to become unstable, and is destroying ancient buildings and statues carved from marble and limestone.

Reducing Sunlight

High levels of particulate pollution from all types of burning reduces the amount of sunlight that reaches the surface and even changes  the appearance of the sky . When less sunlight is available for photosynthesis, forests grow at a slower rate and crops are less productive. Hazy skies not only reduce visibility, but also impact the weather and even the climate .

Making a Hole in the Ozone Layer

A view of the Earth showing the ozone hole as recorded in 2019.

In 2019 the ozone hole over Antarctica (shown in blue) was the smallest it has been since the hole was discovered. Since the banning of CFCs, the ozone hole continues to shrink, but scientists warn that complete recovery is still uncertain.

The hole in the ozone layer is caused by air pollutants . Chemicals used as refrigerants, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), contain chlorine atoms. Releasing chlorine atoms into the atmosphere destroys ozone. A single chlorine atom can destroy thousands of ozone molecules. The ozone layer blocks harmful ultraviolet-C (UVC) and ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation from the Sun — it protects us in a way that is similar to putting sunscreen on your skin to prevent sunburn. The ozone hole puts all living things at risk by increasing the amount of ultraviolet radiation that reaches the surface. Exposure to this radiation increases the risk of skin cancer in humans, restricts growth and development in plants, slows the development of fish and amphibians, and reduces the number of phytoplankton in marine ecosystems. It also causes natural and synthetic materials to breakdown at an accelerated rate.

Adding Too Much Nitrogen to the Land

Gaseous ammonia (NH3) from agriculture and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) from car, truck, and airplane emissions increase the amount of nitrogen in soils. Plants need nitrogen to grow, but too much nitrogen can limit the growth of some plants and increase the growth of others, disrupting the balance of species within an ecosystem. This disruption is negatively impacting grasslands and other fragile environments around the world.

Global map showing the change in the concentration of ammonia over a 14 year period. Areas in red, such as the eastern US, equatorial Africa, much of Europe, northern India, northern Russia, and the entire western coast of Asia have increased concentrations of ammonia. Some areas shown in blue, such as central South America, western Canada, eastern Europe, and south-eastern Russia show a decrease in concentrations of ammonia.

This map shows global ammonia hotspots identified over a 14-year period. Warm colors represent an increase in ammonia, while cool colors represent a decrease in ammonia. NASA

Effects of Greenhouse Gas Pollution

Greenhouse gas pollution is causing climate change. As a result, ecosystems are changing faster than plants and animals can adapt, and many species are going extinct. Marine ecosystems are vulnerable to ocean acidification caused when carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere is dissolved in seawater. Ocean acidification makes it difficult for many marine species to grow shells and skeletons.

Melting ice sheets, warming oceans, and extreme weather conditions are examples of how climate changes caused by greenhouse gas pollution threaten ecosystems across the Earth. In many cases, the decline of one or a few species due to air pollution can topple the balance of entire ecosystems.

  • Air Quality Activities
  • How Does Ozone Damage Plants?
  • Ozone in the Troposphere
  • The Changing Nitrogen Cycle
  • The Greenhouse Effect

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

  • Publications
  • Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

  • Advanced Search
  • Journal List
  • Front Public Health

Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review

Ioannis manisalidis.

1 Delphis S.A., Kifisia, Greece

2 Laboratory of Hygiene and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece

Elisavet Stavropoulou

3 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Service de Médicine Interne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Agathangelos Stavropoulos

4 School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Eugenia Bezirtzoglou

One of our era's greatest scourges is air pollution, on account not only of its impact on climate change but also its impact on public and individual health due to increasing morbidity and mortality. There are many pollutants that are major factors in disease in humans. Among them, Particulate Matter (PM), particles of variable but very small diameter, penetrate the respiratory system via inhalation, causing respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, reproductive and central nervous system dysfunctions, and cancer. Despite the fact that ozone in the stratosphere plays a protective role against ultraviolet irradiation, it is harmful when in high concentration at ground level, also affecting the respiratory and cardiovascular system. Furthermore, nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), dioxins, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are all considered air pollutants that are harmful to humans. Carbon monoxide can even provoke direct poisoning when breathed in at high levels. Heavy metals such as lead, when absorbed into the human body, can lead to direct poisoning or chronic intoxication, depending on exposure. Diseases occurring from the aforementioned substances include principally respiratory problems such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), asthma, bronchiolitis, and also lung cancer, cardiovascular events, central nervous system dysfunctions, and cutaneous diseases. Last but not least, climate change resulting from environmental pollution affects the geographical distribution of many infectious diseases, as do natural disasters. The only way to tackle this problem is through public awareness coupled with a multidisciplinary approach by scientific experts; national and international organizations must address the emergence of this threat and propose sustainable solutions.

Approach to the Problem

The interactions between humans and their physical surroundings have been extensively studied, as multiple human activities influence the environment. The environment is a coupling of the biotic (living organisms and microorganisms) and the abiotic (hydrosphere, lithosphere, and atmosphere).

Pollution is defined as the introduction into the environment of substances harmful to humans and other living organisms. Pollutants are harmful solids, liquids, or gases produced in higher than usual concentrations that reduce the quality of our environment.

Human activities have an adverse effect on the environment by polluting the water we drink, the air we breathe, and the soil in which plants grow. Although the industrial revolution was a great success in terms of technology, society, and the provision of multiple services, it also introduced the production of huge quantities of pollutants emitted into the air that are harmful to human health. Without any doubt, the global environmental pollution is considered an international public health issue with multiple facets. Social, economic, and legislative concerns and lifestyle habits are related to this major problem. Clearly, urbanization and industrialization are reaching unprecedented and upsetting proportions worldwide in our era. Anthropogenic air pollution is one of the biggest public health hazards worldwide, given that it accounts for about 9 million deaths per year ( 1 ).

Without a doubt, all of the aforementioned are closely associated with climate change, and in the event of danger, the consequences can be severe for mankind ( 2 ). Climate changes and the effects of global planetary warming seriously affect multiple ecosystems, causing problems such as food safety issues, ice and iceberg melting, animal extinction, and damage to plants ( 3 , 4 ).

Air pollution has various health effects. The health of susceptible and sensitive individuals can be impacted even on low air pollution days. Short-term exposure to air pollutants is closely related to COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), cough, shortness of breath, wheezing, asthma, respiratory disease, and high rates of hospitalization (a measurement of morbidity).

The long-term effects associated with air pollution are chronic asthma, pulmonary insufficiency, cardiovascular diseases, and cardiovascular mortality. According to a Swedish cohort study, diabetes seems to be induced after long-term air pollution exposure ( 5 ). Moreover, air pollution seems to have various malign health effects in early human life, such as respiratory, cardiovascular, mental, and perinatal disorders ( 3 ), leading to infant mortality or chronic disease in adult age ( 6 ).

National reports have mentioned the increased risk of morbidity and mortality ( 1 ). These studies were conducted in many places around the world and show a correlation between daily ranges of particulate matter (PM) concentration and daily mortality. Climate shifts and global planetary warming ( 3 ) could aggravate the situation. Besides, increased hospitalization (an index of morbidity) has been registered among the elderly and susceptible individuals for specific reasons. Fine and ultrafine particulate matter seems to be associated with more serious illnesses ( 6 ), as it can invade the deepest parts of the airways and more easily reach the bloodstream.

Air pollution mainly affects those living in large urban areas, where road emissions contribute the most to the degradation of air quality. There is also a danger of industrial accidents, where the spread of a toxic fog can be fatal to the populations of the surrounding areas. The dispersion of pollutants is determined by many parameters, most notably atmospheric stability and wind ( 6 ).

In developing countries ( 7 ), the problem is more serious due to overpopulation and uncontrolled urbanization along with the development of industrialization. This leads to poor air quality, especially in countries with social disparities and a lack of information on sustainable management of the environment. The use of fuels such as wood fuel or solid fuel for domestic needs due to low incomes exposes people to bad-quality, polluted air at home. It is of note that three billion people around the world are using the above sources of energy for their daily heating and cooking needs ( 8 ). In developing countries, the women of the household seem to carry the highest risk for disease development due to their longer duration exposure to the indoor air pollution ( 8 , 9 ). Due to its fast industrial development and overpopulation, China is one of the Asian countries confronting serious air pollution problems ( 10 , 11 ). The lung cancer mortality observed in China is associated with fine particles ( 12 ). As stated already, long-term exposure is associated with deleterious effects on the cardiovascular system ( 3 , 5 ). However, it is interesting to note that cardiovascular diseases have mostly been observed in developed and high-income countries rather than in the developing low-income countries exposed highly to air pollution ( 13 ). Extreme air pollution is recorded in India, where the air quality reaches hazardous levels. New Delhi is one of the more polluted cities in India. Flights in and out of New Delhi International Airport are often canceled due to the reduced visibility associated with air pollution. Pollution is occurring both in urban and rural areas in India due to the fast industrialization, urbanization, and rise in use of motorcycle transportation. Nevertheless, biomass combustion associated with heating and cooking needs and practices is a major source of household air pollution in India and in Nepal ( 14 , 15 ). There is spatial heterogeneity in India, as areas with diverse climatological conditions and population and education levels generate different indoor air qualities, with higher PM 2.5 observed in North Indian states (557–601 μg/m 3 ) compared to the Southern States (183–214 μg/m 3 ) ( 16 , 17 ). The cold climate of the North Indian areas may be the main reason for this, as longer periods at home and more heating are necessary compared to in the tropical climate of Southern India. Household air pollution in India is associated with major health effects, especially in women and young children, who stay indoors for longer periods. Chronic obstructive respiratory disease (CORD) and lung cancer are mostly observed in women, while acute lower respiratory disease is seen in young children under 5 years of age ( 18 ).

Accumulation of air pollution, especially sulfur dioxide and smoke, reaching 1,500 mg/m3, resulted in an increase in the number of deaths (4,000 deaths) in December 1952 in London and in 1963 in New York City (400 deaths) ( 19 ). An association of pollution with mortality was reported on the basis of monitoring of outdoor pollution in six US metropolitan cities ( 20 ). In every case, it seems that mortality was closely related to the levels of fine, inhalable, and sulfate particles more than with the levels of total particulate pollution, aerosol acidity, sulfur dioxide, or nitrogen dioxide ( 20 ).

Furthermore, extremely high levels of pollution are reported in Mexico City and Rio de Janeiro, followed by Milan, Ankara, Melbourne, Tokyo, and Moscow ( 19 ).

Based on the magnitude of the public health impact, it is certain that different kinds of interventions should be taken into account. Success and effectiveness in controlling air pollution, specifically at the local level, have been reported. Adequate technological means are applied considering the source and the nature of the emission as well as its impact on health and the environment. The importance of point sources and non-point sources of air pollution control is reported by Schwela and Köth-Jahr ( 21 ). Without a doubt, a detailed emission inventory must record all sources in a given area. Beyond considering the above sources and their nature, topography and meteorology should also be considered, as stated previously. Assessment of the control policies and methods is often extrapolated from the local to the regional and then to the global scale. Air pollution may be dispersed and transported from one region to another area located far away. Air pollution management means the reduction to acceptable levels or possible elimination of air pollutants whose presence in the air affects our health or the environmental ecosystem. Private and governmental entities and authorities implement actions to ensure the air quality ( 22 ). Air quality standards and guidelines were adopted for the different pollutants by the WHO and EPA as a tool for the management of air quality ( 1 , 23 ). These standards have to be compared to the emissions inventory standards by causal analysis and dispersion modeling in order to reveal the problematic areas ( 24 ). Inventories are generally based on a combination of direct measurements and emissions modeling ( 24 ).

As an example, we state here the control measures at the source through the use of catalytic converters in cars. These are devices that turn the pollutants and toxic gases produced from combustion engines into less-toxic pollutants by catalysis through redox reactions ( 25 ). In Greece, the use of private cars was restricted by tracking their license plates in order to reduce traffic congestion during rush hour ( 25 ).

Concerning industrial emissions, collectors and closed systems can keep the air pollution to the minimal standards imposed by legislation ( 26 ).

Current strategies to improve air quality require an estimation of the economic value of the benefits gained from proposed programs. These proposed programs by public authorities, and directives are issued with guidelines to be respected.

In Europe, air quality limit values AQLVs (Air Quality Limit Values) are issued for setting off planning claims ( 27 ). In the USA, the NAAQS (National Ambient Air Quality Standards) establish the national air quality limit values ( 27 ). While both standards and directives are based on different mechanisms, significant success has been achieved in the reduction of overall emissions and associated health and environmental effects ( 27 ). The European Directive identifies geographical areas of risk exposure as monitoring/assessment zones to record the emission sources and levels of air pollution ( 27 ), whereas the USA establishes global geographical air quality criteria according to the severity of their air quality problem and records all sources of the pollutants and their precursors ( 27 ).

In this vein, funds have been financing, directly or indirectly, projects related to air quality along with the technical infrastructure to maintain good air quality. These plans focus on an inventory of databases from air quality environmental planning awareness campaigns. Moreover, pollution measures of air emissions may be taken for vehicles, machines, and industries in urban areas.

Technological innovation can only be successful if it is able to meet the needs of society. In this sense, technology must reflect the decision-making practices and procedures of those involved in risk assessment and evaluation and act as a facilitator in providing information and assessments to enable decision makers to make the best decisions possible. Summarizing the aforementioned in order to design an effective air quality control strategy, several aspects must be considered: environmental factors and ambient air quality conditions, engineering factors and air pollutant characteristics, and finally, economic operating costs for technological improvement and administrative and legal costs. Considering the economic factor, competitiveness through neoliberal concepts is offering a solution to environmental problems ( 22 ).

The development of environmental governance, along with technological progress, has initiated the deployment of a dialogue. Environmental politics has created objections and points of opposition between different political parties, scientists, media, and governmental and non-governmental organizations ( 22 ). Radical environmental activism actions and movements have been created ( 22 ). The rise of the new information and communication technologies (ICTs) are many times examined as to whether and in which way they have influenced means of communication and social movements such as activism ( 28 ). Since the 1990s, the term “digital activism” has been used increasingly and in many different disciplines ( 29 ). Nowadays, multiple digital technologies can be used to produce a digital activism outcome on environmental issues. More specifically, devices with online capabilities such as computers or mobile phones are being used as a way to pursue change in political and social affairs ( 30 ).

In the present paper, we focus on the sources of environmental pollution in relation to public health and propose some solutions and interventions that may be of interest to environmental legislators and decision makers.

Sources of Exposure

It is known that the majority of environmental pollutants are emitted through large-scale human activities such as the use of industrial machinery, power-producing stations, combustion engines, and cars. Because these activities are performed at such a large scale, they are by far the major contributors to air pollution, with cars estimated to be responsible for approximately 80% of today's pollution ( 31 ). Some other human activities are also influencing our environment to a lesser extent, such as field cultivation techniques, gas stations, fuel tanks heaters, and cleaning procedures ( 32 ), as well as several natural sources, such as volcanic and soil eruptions and forest fires.

The classification of air pollutants is based mainly on the sources producing pollution. Therefore, it is worth mentioning the four main sources, following the classification system: Major sources, Area sources, Mobile sources, and Natural sources.

Major sources include the emission of pollutants from power stations, refineries, and petrochemicals, the chemical and fertilizer industries, metallurgical and other industrial plants, and, finally, municipal incineration.

Indoor area sources include domestic cleaning activities, dry cleaners, printing shops, and petrol stations.

Mobile sources include automobiles, cars, railways, airways, and other types of vehicles.

Finally, natural sources include, as stated previously, physical disasters ( 33 ) such as forest fire, volcanic erosion, dust storms, and agricultural burning.

However, many classification systems have been proposed. Another type of classification is a grouping according to the recipient of the pollution, as follows:

Air pollution is determined as the presence of pollutants in the air in large quantities for long periods. Air pollutants are dispersed particles, hydrocarbons, CO, CO 2 , NO, NO 2 , SO 3 , etc.

Water pollution is organic and inorganic charge and biological charge ( 10 ) at high levels that affect the water quality ( 34 , 35 ).

Soil pollution occurs through the release of chemicals or the disposal of wastes, such as heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and pesticides.

Air pollution can influence the quality of soil and water bodies by polluting precipitation, falling into water and soil environments ( 34 , 36 ). Notably, the chemistry of the soil can be amended due to acid precipitation by affecting plants, cultures, and water quality ( 37 ). Moreover, movement of heavy metals is favored by soil acidity, and metals are so then moving into the watery environment. It is known that heavy metals such as aluminum are noxious to wildlife and fishes. Soil quality seems to be of importance, as soils with low calcium carbonate levels are at increased jeopardy from acid rain. Over and above rain, snow and particulate matter drip into watery ' bodies ( 36 , 38 ).

Lastly, pollution is classified following type of origin:

Radioactive and nuclear pollution , releasing radioactive and nuclear pollutants into water, air, and soil during nuclear explosions and accidents, from nuclear weapons, and through handling or disposal of radioactive sewage.

Radioactive materials can contaminate surface water bodies and, being noxious to the environment, plants, animals, and humans. It is known that several radioactive substances such as radium and uranium concentrate in the bones and can cause cancers ( 38 , 39 ).

Noise pollution is produced by machines, vehicles, traffic noises, and musical installations that are harmful to our hearing.

The World Health Organization introduced the term DALYs. The DALYs for a disease or health condition is defined as the sum of the Years of Life Lost (YLL) due to premature mortality in the population and the Years Lost due to Disability (YLD) for people living with the health condition or its consequences ( 39 ). In Europe, air pollution is the main cause of disability-adjusted life years lost (DALYs), followed by noise pollution. The potential relationships of noise and air pollution with health have been studied ( 40 ). The study found that DALYs related to noise were more important than those related to air pollution, as the effects of environmental noise on cardiovascular disease were independent of air pollution ( 40 ). Environmental noise should be counted as an independent public health risk ( 40 ).

Environmental pollution occurs when changes in the physical, chemical, or biological constituents of the environment (air masses, temperature, climate, etc.) are produced.

Pollutants harm our environment either by increasing levels above normal or by introducing harmful toxic substances. Primary pollutants are directly produced from the above sources, and secondary pollutants are emitted as by-products of the primary ones. Pollutants can be biodegradable or non-biodegradable and of natural origin or anthropogenic, as stated previously. Moreover, their origin can be a unique source (point-source) or dispersed sources.

Pollutants have differences in physical and chemical properties, explaining the discrepancy in their capacity for producing toxic effects. As an example, we state here that aerosol compounds ( 41 – 43 ) have a greater toxicity than gaseous compounds due to their tiny size (solid or liquid) in the atmosphere; they have a greater penetration capacity. Gaseous compounds are eliminated more easily by our respiratory system ( 41 ). These particles are able to damage lungs and can even enter the bloodstream ( 41 ), leading to the premature deaths of millions of people yearly. Moreover, the aerosol acidity ([H+]) seems to considerably enhance the production of secondary organic aerosols (SOA), but this last aspect is not supported by other scientific teams ( 38 ).

Climate and Pollution

Air pollution and climate change are closely related. Climate is the other side of the same coin that reduces the quality of our Earth ( 44 ). Pollutants such as black carbon, methane, tropospheric ozone, and aerosols affect the amount of incoming sunlight. As a result, the temperature of the Earth is increasing, resulting in the melting of ice, icebergs, and glaciers.

In this vein, climatic changes will affect the incidence and prevalence of both residual and imported infections in Europe. Climate and weather affect the duration, timing, and intensity of outbreaks strongly and change the map of infectious diseases in the globe ( 45 ). Mosquito-transmitted parasitic or viral diseases are extremely climate-sensitive, as warming firstly shortens the pathogen incubation period and secondly shifts the geographic map of the vector. Similarly, water-warming following climate changes leads to a high incidence of waterborne infections. Recently, in Europe, eradicated diseases seem to be emerging due to the migration of population, for example, cholera, poliomyelitis, tick-borne encephalitis, and malaria ( 46 ).

The spread of epidemics is associated with natural climate disasters and storms, which seem to occur more frequently nowadays ( 47 ). Malnutrition and disequilibration of the immune system are also associated with the emerging infections affecting public health ( 48 ).

The Chikungunya virus “took the airplane” from the Indian Ocean to Europe, as outbreaks of the disease were registered in Italy ( 49 ) as well as autochthonous cases in France ( 50 ).

An increase in cryptosporidiosis in the United Kingdom and in the Czech Republic seems to have occurred following flooding ( 36 , 51 ).

As stated previously, aerosols compounds are tiny in size and considerably affect the climate. They are able to dissipate sunlight (the albedo phenomenon) by dispersing a quarter of the sun's rays back to space and have cooled the global temperature over the last 30 years ( 52 ).

Air Pollutants

The World Health Organization (WHO) reports on six major air pollutants, namely particle pollution, ground-level ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and lead. Air pollution can have a disastrous effect on all components of the environment, including groundwater, soil, and air. Additionally, it poses a serious threat to living organisms. In this vein, our interest is mainly to focus on these pollutants, as they are related to more extensive and severe problems in human health and environmental impact. Acid rain, global warming, the greenhouse effect, and climate changes have an important ecological impact on air pollution ( 53 ).

Particulate Matter (PM) and Health

Studies have shown a relationship between particulate matter (PM) and adverse health effects, focusing on either short-term (acute) or long-term (chronic) PM exposure.

Particulate matter (PM) is usually formed in the atmosphere as a result of chemical reactions between the different pollutants. The penetration of particles is closely dependent on their size ( 53 ). Particulate Matter (PM) was defined as a term for particles by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( 54 ). Particulate matter (PM) pollution includes particles with diameters of 10 micrometers (μm) or smaller, called PM 10 , and extremely fine particles with diameters that are generally 2.5 micrometers (μm) and smaller.

Particulate matter contains tiny liquid or solid droplets that can be inhaled and cause serious health effects ( 55 ). Particles <10 μm in diameter (PM 10 ) after inhalation can invade the lungs and even reach the bloodstream. Fine particles, PM 2.5 , pose a greater risk to health ( 6 , 56 ) ( Table 1 ).

Penetrability according to particle size.

>11 μmPassage into nostrils and upper respiratory tract
7–11 μmPassage into nasal cavity
4.7–7 μmPassage into larynx
3.3–4.7 μmPassage into trachea-bronchial area
2.1–3.3 μmSecondary bronchial area passage
1.1–2.1 μmTerminal bronchial area passage
0.65–1.1 μmBronchioles penetrability
0.43–0.65 μmAlveolar penetrability

Multiple epidemiological studies have been performed on the health effects of PM. A positive relation was shown between both short-term and long-term exposures of PM 2.5 and acute nasopharyngitis ( 56 ). In addition, long-term exposure to PM for years was found to be related to cardiovascular diseases and infant mortality.

Those studies depend on PM 2.5 monitors and are restricted in terms of study area or city area due to a lack of spatially resolved daily PM 2.5 concentration data and, in this way, are not representative of the entire population. Following a recent epidemiological study by the Department of Environmental Health at Harvard School of Public Health (Boston, MA) ( 57 ), it was reported that, as PM 2.5 concentrations vary spatially, an exposure error (Berkson error) seems to be produced, and the relative magnitudes of the short- and long-term effects are not yet completely elucidated. The team developed a PM 2.5 exposure model based on remote sensing data for assessing short- and long-term human exposures ( 57 ). This model permits spatial resolution in short-term effects plus the assessment of long-term effects in the whole population.

Moreover, respiratory diseases and affection of the immune system are registered as long-term chronic effects ( 58 ). It is worth noting that people with asthma, pneumonia, diabetes, and respiratory and cardiovascular diseases are especially susceptible and vulnerable to the effects of PM. PM 2.5 , followed by PM 10 , are strongly associated with diverse respiratory system diseases ( 59 ), as their size permits them to pierce interior spaces ( 60 ). The particles produce toxic effects according to their chemical and physical properties. The components of PM 10 and PM 2.5 can be organic (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins, benzene, 1-3 butadiene) or inorganic (carbon, chlorides, nitrates, sulfates, metals) in nature ( 55 ).

Particulate Matter (PM) is divided into four main categories according to type and size ( 61 ) ( Table 2 ).

Types and sizes of particulate Matter (PM).

Particulate contaminantsSmog0.01–1
Soot0.01–0.8
Tobacco smoke0.01–1
Fly ash1–100
Cement Dust8–100
Biological ContaminantsBacteria and bacterial spores0.7–10
Viruses0.01–1
Fungi and molds2–12
Allergens (dogs, cats, pollen, household dust)0.1–100
Types of DustAtmospheric dust0.01–1
Heavy dust100–1000
Settling dust1–100
GasesDifferent gaseous contaminants0.0001–0.01

Gas contaminants include PM in aerial masses.

Particulate contaminants include contaminants such as smog, soot, tobacco smoke, oil smoke, fly ash, and cement dust.

Biological Contaminants are microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi, mold, and bacterial spores), cat allergens, house dust and allergens, and pollen.

Types of Dust include suspended atmospheric dust, settling dust, and heavy dust.

Finally, another fact is that the half-lives of PM 10 and PM 2.5 particles in the atmosphere is extended due to their tiny dimensions; this permits their long-lasting suspension in the atmosphere and even their transfer and spread to distant destinations where people and the environment may be exposed to the same magnitude of pollution ( 53 ). They are able to change the nutrient balance in watery ecosystems, damage forests and crops, and acidify water bodies.

As stated, PM 2.5 , due to their tiny size, are causing more serious health effects. These aforementioned fine particles are the main cause of the “haze” formation in different metropolitan areas ( 12 , 13 , 61 ).

Ozone Impact in the Atmosphere

Ozone (O 3 ) is a gas formed from oxygen under high voltage electric discharge ( 62 ). It is a strong oxidant, 52% stronger than chlorine. It arises in the stratosphere, but it could also arise following chain reactions of photochemical smog in the troposphere ( 63 ).

Ozone can travel to distant areas from its initial source, moving with air masses ( 64 ). It is surprising that ozone levels over cities are low in contrast to the increased amounts occuring in urban areas, which could become harmful for cultures, forests, and vegetation ( 65 ) as it is reducing carbon assimilation ( 66 ). Ozone reduces growth and yield ( 47 , 48 ) and affects the plant microflora due to its antimicrobial capacity ( 67 , 68 ). In this regard, ozone acts upon other natural ecosystems, with microflora ( 69 , 70 ) and animal species changing their species composition ( 71 ). Ozone increases DNA damage in epidermal keratinocytes and leads to impaired cellular function ( 72 ).

Ground-level ozone (GLO) is generated through a chemical reaction between oxides of nitrogen and VOCs emitted from natural sources and/or following anthropogenic activities.

Ozone uptake usually occurs by inhalation. Ozone affects the upper layers of the skin and the tear ducts ( 73 ). A study of short-term exposure of mice to high levels of ozone showed malondialdehyde formation in the upper skin (epidermis) but also depletion in vitamins C and E. It is likely that ozone levels are not interfering with the skin barrier function and integrity to predispose to skin disease ( 74 ).

Due to the low water-solubility of ozone, inhaled ozone has the capacity to penetrate deeply into the lungs ( 75 ).

Toxic effects induced by ozone are registered in urban areas all over the world, causing biochemical, morphologic, functional, and immunological disorders ( 76 ).

The European project (APHEA2) focuses on the acute effects of ambient ozone concentrations on mortality ( 77 ). Daily ozone concentrations compared to the daily number of deaths were reported from different European cities for a 3-year period. During the warm period of the year, an observed increase in ozone concentration was associated with an increase in the daily number of deaths (0.33%), in the number of respiratory deaths (1.13%), and in the number of cardiovascular deaths (0.45%). No effect was observed during wintertime.

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

Carbon monoxide is produced by fossil fuel when combustion is incomplete. The symptoms of poisoning due to inhaling carbon monoxide include headache, dizziness, weakness, nausea, vomiting, and, finally, loss of consciousness.

The affinity of carbon monoxide to hemoglobin is much greater than that of oxygen. In this vein, serious poisoning may occur in people exposed to high levels of carbon monoxide for a long period of time. Due to the loss of oxygen as a result of the competitive binding of carbon monoxide, hypoxia, ischemia, and cardiovascular disease are observed.

Carbon monoxide affects the greenhouses gases that are tightly connected to global warming and climate. This should lead to an increase in soil and water temperatures, and extreme weather conditions or storms may occur ( 68 ).

However, in laboratory and field experiments, it has been seen to produce increased plant growth ( 78 ).

Nitrogen Oxide (NO 2 )

Nitrogen oxide is a traffic-related pollutant, as it is emitted from automobile motor engines ( 79 , 80 ). It is an irritant of the respiratory system as it penetrates deep in the lung, inducing respiratory diseases, coughing, wheezing, dyspnea, bronchospasm, and even pulmonary edema when inhaled at high levels. It seems that concentrations over 0.2 ppm produce these adverse effects in humans, while concentrations higher than 2.0 ppm affect T-lymphocytes, particularly the CD8+ cells and NK cells that produce our immune response ( 81 ).It is reported that long-term exposure to high levels of nitrogen dioxide can be responsible for chronic lung disease. Long-term exposure to NO 2 can impair the sense of smell ( 81 ).

However, systems other than respiratory ones can be involved, as symptoms such as eye, throat, and nose irritation have been registered ( 81 ).

High levels of nitrogen dioxide are deleterious to crops and vegetation, as they have been observed to reduce crop yield and plant growth efficiency. Moreover, NO 2 can reduce visibility and discolor fabrics ( 81 ).

Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 )

Sulfur dioxide is a harmful gas that is emitted mainly from fossil fuel consumption or industrial activities. The annual standard for SO 2 is 0.03 ppm ( 82 ). It affects human, animal, and plant life. Susceptible people as those with lung disease, old people, and children, who present a higher risk of damage. The major health problems associated with sulfur dioxide emissions in industrialized areas are respiratory irritation, bronchitis, mucus production, and bronchospasm, as it is a sensory irritant and penetrates deep into the lung converted into bisulfite and interacting with sensory receptors, causing bronchoconstriction. Moreover, skin redness, damage to the eyes (lacrimation and corneal opacity) and mucous membranes, and worsening of pre-existing cardiovascular disease have been observed ( 81 ).

Environmental adverse effects, such as acidification of soil and acid rain, seem to be associated with sulfur dioxide emissions ( 83 ).

Lead is a heavy metal used in different industrial plants and emitted from some petrol motor engines, batteries, radiators, waste incinerators, and waste waters ( 84 ).

Moreover, major sources of lead pollution in the air are metals, ore, and piston-engine aircraft. Lead poisoning is a threat to public health due to its deleterious effects upon humans, animals, and the environment, especially in the developing countries.

Exposure to lead can occur through inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption. Trans- placental transport of lead was also reported, as lead passes through the placenta unencumbered ( 85 ). The younger the fetus is, the more harmful the toxic effects. Lead toxicity affects the fetal nervous system; edema or swelling of the brain is observed ( 86 ). Lead, when inhaled, accumulates in the blood, soft tissue, liver, lung, bones, and cardiovascular, nervous, and reproductive systems. Moreover, loss of concentration and memory, as well as muscle and joint pain, were observed in adults ( 85 , 86 ).

Children and newborns ( 87 ) are extremely susceptible even to minimal doses of lead, as it is a neurotoxicant and causes learning disabilities, impairment of memory, hyperactivity, and even mental retardation.

Elevated amounts of lead in the environment are harmful to plants and crop growth. Neurological effects are observed in vertebrates and animals in association with high lead levels ( 88 ).

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons(PAHs)

The distribution of PAHs is ubiquitous in the environment, as the atmosphere is the most important means of their dispersal. They are found in coal and in tar sediments. Moreover, they are generated through incomplete combustion of organic matter as in the cases of forest fires, incineration, and engines ( 89 ). PAH compounds, such as benzopyrene, acenaphthylene, anthracene, and fluoranthene are recognized as toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic substances. They are an important risk factor for lung cancer ( 89 ).

Volatile Organic Compounds(VOCs)

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as toluene, benzene, ethylbenzene, and xylene ( 90 ), have been found to be associated with cancer in humans ( 91 ). The use of new products and materials has actually resulted in increased concentrations of VOCs. VOCs pollute indoor air ( 90 ) and may have adverse effects on human health ( 91 ). Short-term and long-term adverse effects on human health are observed. VOCs are responsible for indoor air smells. Short-term exposure is found to cause irritation of eyes, nose, throat, and mucosal membranes, while those of long duration exposure include toxic reactions ( 92 ). Predictable assessment of the toxic effects of complex VOC mixtures is difficult to estimate, as these pollutants can have synergic, antagonistic, or indifferent effects ( 91 , 93 ).

Dioxins originate from industrial processes but also come from natural processes, such as forest fires and volcanic eruptions. They accumulate in foods such as meat and dairy products, fish and shellfish, and especially in the fatty tissue of animals ( 94 ).

Short-period exhibition to high dioxin concentrations may result in dark spots and lesions on the skin ( 94 ). Long-term exposure to dioxins can cause developmental problems, impairment of the immune, endocrine and nervous systems, reproductive infertility, and cancer ( 94 ).

Without any doubt, fossil fuel consumption is responsible for a sizeable part of air contamination. This contamination may be anthropogenic, as in agricultural and industrial processes or transportation, while contamination from natural sources is also possible. Interestingly, it is of note that the air quality standards established through the European Air Quality Directive are somewhat looser than the WHO guidelines, which are stricter ( 95 ).

Effect of Air Pollution on Health

The most common air pollutants are ground-level ozone and Particulates Matter (PM). Air pollution is distinguished into two main types:

Outdoor pollution is the ambient air pollution.

Indoor pollution is the pollution generated by household combustion of fuels.

People exposed to high concentrations of air pollutants experience disease symptoms and states of greater and lesser seriousness. These effects are grouped into short- and long-term effects affecting health.

Susceptible populations that need to be aware of health protection measures include old people, children, and people with diabetes and predisposing heart or lung disease, especially asthma.

As extensively stated previously, according to a recent epidemiological study from Harvard School of Public Health, the relative magnitudes of the short- and long-term effects have not been completely clarified ( 57 ) due to the different epidemiological methodologies and to the exposure errors. New models are proposed for assessing short- and long-term human exposure data more successfully ( 57 ). Thus, in the present section, we report the more common short- and long-term health effects but also general concerns for both types of effects, as these effects are often dependent on environmental conditions, dose, and individual susceptibility.

Short-term effects are temporary and range from simple discomfort, such as irritation of the eyes, nose, skin, throat, wheezing, coughing and chest tightness, and breathing difficulties, to more serious states, such as asthma, pneumonia, bronchitis, and lung and heart problems. Short-term exposure to air pollution can also cause headaches, nausea, and dizziness.

These problems can be aggravated by extended long-term exposure to the pollutants, which is harmful to the neurological, reproductive, and respiratory systems and causes cancer and even, rarely, deaths.

The long-term effects are chronic, lasting for years or the whole life and can even lead to death. Furthermore, the toxicity of several air pollutants may also induce a variety of cancers in the long term ( 96 ).

As stated already, respiratory disorders are closely associated with the inhalation of air pollutants. These pollutants will invade through the airways and will accumulate at the cells. Damage to target cells should be related to the pollutant component involved and its source and dose. Health effects are also closely dependent on country, area, season, and time. An extended exposure duration to the pollutant should incline to long-term health effects in relation also to the above factors.

Particulate Matter (PMs), dust, benzene, and O 3 cause serious damage to the respiratory system ( 97 ). Moreover, there is a supplementary risk in case of existing respiratory disease such as asthma ( 98 ). Long-term effects are more frequent in people with a predisposing disease state. When the trachea is contaminated by pollutants, voice alterations may be remarked after acute exposure. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be induced following air pollution, increasing morbidity and mortality ( 99 ). Long-term effects from traffic, industrial air pollution, and combustion of fuels are the major factors for COPD risk ( 99 ).

Multiple cardiovascular effects have been observed after exposure to air pollutants ( 100 ). Changes occurred in blood cells after long-term exposure may affect cardiac functionality. Coronary arteriosclerosis was reported following long-term exposure to traffic emissions ( 101 ), while short-term exposure is related to hypertension, stroke, myocardial infracts, and heart insufficiency. Ventricle hypertrophy is reported to occur in humans after long-time exposure to nitrogen oxide (NO 2 ) ( 102 , 103 ).

Neurological effects have been observed in adults and children after extended-term exposure to air pollutants.

Psychological complications, autism, retinopathy, fetal growth, and low birth weight seem to be related to long-term air pollution ( 83 ). The etiologic agent of the neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer's and Parkinson's) is not yet known, although it is believed that extended exposure to air pollution seems to be a factor. Specifically, pesticides and metals are cited as etiological factors, together with diet. The mechanisms in the development of neurodegenerative disease include oxidative stress, protein aggregation, inflammation, and mitochondrial impairment in neurons ( 104 ) ( Figure 1 ).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is fpubh-08-00014-g0001.jpg

Impact of air pollutants on the brain.

Brain inflammation was observed in dogs living in a highly polluted area in Mexico for a long period ( 105 ). In human adults, markers of systemic inflammation (IL-6 and fibrinogen) were found to be increased as an immediate response to PNC on the IL-6 level, possibly leading to the production of acute-phase proteins ( 106 ). The progression of atherosclerosis and oxidative stress seem to be the mechanisms involved in the neurological disturbances caused by long-term air pollution. Inflammation comes secondary to the oxidative stress and seems to be involved in the impairment of developmental maturation, affecting multiple organs ( 105 , 107 ). Similarly, other factors seem to be involved in the developmental maturation, which define the vulnerability to long-term air pollution. These include birthweight, maternal smoking, genetic background and socioeconomic environment, as well as education level.

However, diet, starting from breast-feeding, is another determinant factor. Diet is the main source of antioxidants, which play a key role in our protection against air pollutants ( 108 ). Antioxidants are free radical scavengers and limit the interaction of free radicals in the brain ( 108 ). Similarly, genetic background may result in a differential susceptibility toward the oxidative stress pathway ( 60 ). For example, antioxidant supplementation with vitamins C and E appears to modulate the effect of ozone in asthmatic children homozygous for the GSTM1 null allele ( 61 ). Inflammatory cytokines released in the periphery (e.g., respiratory epithelia) upregulate the innate immune Toll-like receptor 2. Such activation and the subsequent events leading to neurodegeneration have recently been observed in lung lavage in mice exposed to ambient Los Angeles (CA, USA) particulate matter ( 61 ). In children, neurodevelopmental morbidities were observed after lead exposure. These children developed aggressive and delinquent behavior, reduced intelligence, learning difficulties, and hyperactivity ( 109 ). No level of lead exposure seems to be “safe,” and the scientific community has asked the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to reduce the current screening guideline of 10 μg/dl ( 109 ).

It is important to state that impact on the immune system, causing dysfunction and neuroinflammation ( 104 ), is related to poor air quality. Yet, increases in serum levels of immunoglobulins (IgA, IgM) and the complement component C3 are observed ( 106 ). Another issue is that antigen presentation is affected by air pollutants, as there is an upregulation of costimulatory molecules such as CD80 and CD86 on macrophages ( 110 ).

As is known, skin is our shield against ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and other pollutants, as it is the most exterior layer of our body. Traffic-related pollutants, such as PAHs, VOCs, oxides, and PM, may cause pigmented spots on our skin ( 111 ). On the one hand, as already stated, when pollutants penetrate through the skin or are inhaled, damage to the organs is observed, as some of these pollutants are mutagenic and carcinogenic, and, specifically, they affect the liver and lung. On the other hand, air pollutants (and those in the troposphere) reduce the adverse effects of ultraviolet radiation UVR in polluted urban areas ( 111 ). Air pollutants absorbed by the human skin may contribute to skin aging, psoriasis, acne, urticaria, eczema, and atopic dermatitis ( 111 ), usually caused by exposure to oxides and photochemical smoke ( 111 ). Exposure to PM and cigarette smoking act as skin-aging agents, causing spots, dyschromia, and wrinkles. Lastly, pollutants have been associated with skin cancer ( 111 ).

Higher morbidity is reported to fetuses and children when exposed to the above dangers. Impairment in fetal growth, low birth weight, and autism have been reported ( 112 ).

Another exterior organ that may be affected is the eye. Contamination usually comes from suspended pollutants and may result in asymptomatic eye outcomes, irritation ( 112 ), retinopathy, or dry eye syndrome ( 113 , 114 ).

Environmental Impact of Air Pollution

Air pollution is harming not only human health but also the environment ( 115 ) in which we live. The most important environmental effects are as follows.

Acid rain is wet (rain, fog, snow) or dry (particulates and gas) precipitation containing toxic amounts of nitric and sulfuric acids. They are able to acidify the water and soil environments, damage trees and plantations, and even damage buildings and outdoor sculptures, constructions, and statues.

Haze is produced when fine particles are dispersed in the air and reduce the transparency of the atmosphere. It is caused by gas emissions in the air coming from industrial facilities, power plants, automobiles, and trucks.

Ozone , as discussed previously, occurs both at ground level and in the upper level (stratosphere) of the Earth's atmosphere. Stratospheric ozone is protecting us from the Sun's harmful ultraviolet (UV) rays. In contrast, ground-level ozone is harmful to human health and is a pollutant. Unfortunately, stratospheric ozone is gradually damaged by ozone-depleting substances (i.e., chemicals, pesticides, and aerosols). If this protecting stratospheric ozone layer is thinned, then UV radiation can reach our Earth, with harmful effects for human life (skin cancer) ( 116 ) and crops ( 117 ). In plants, ozone penetrates through the stomata, inducing them to close, which blocks CO 2 transfer and induces a reduction in photosynthesis ( 118 ).

Global climate change is an important issue that concerns mankind. As is known, the “greenhouse effect” keeps the Earth's temperature stable. Unhappily, anthropogenic activities have destroyed this protecting temperature effect by producing large amounts of greenhouse gases, and global warming is mounting, with harmful effects on human health, animals, forests, wildlife, agriculture, and the water environment. A report states that global warming is adding to the health risks of poor people ( 119 ).

People living in poorly constructed buildings in warm-climate countries are at high risk for heat-related health problems as temperatures mount ( 119 ).

Wildlife is burdened by toxic pollutants coming from the air, soil, or the water ecosystem and, in this way, animals can develop health problems when exposed to high levels of pollutants. Reproductive failure and birth effects have been reported.

Eutrophication is occurring when elevated concentrations of nutrients (especially nitrogen) stimulate the blooming of aquatic algae, which can cause a disequilibration in the diversity of fish and their deaths.

Without a doubt, there is a critical concentration of pollution that an ecosystem can tolerate without being destroyed, which is associated with the ecosystem's capacity to neutralize acidity. The Canada Acid Rain Program established this load at 20 kg/ha/yr ( 120 ).

Hence, air pollution has deleterious effects on both soil and water ( 121 ). Concerning PM as an air pollutant, its impact on crop yield and food productivity has been reported. Its impact on watery bodies is associated with the survival of living organisms and fishes and their productivity potential ( 121 ).

An impairment in photosynthetic rhythm and metabolism is observed in plants exposed to the effects of ozone ( 121 ).

Sulfur and nitrogen oxides are involved in the formation of acid rain and are harmful to plants and marine organisms.

Last but not least, as mentioned above, the toxicity associated with lead and other metals is the main threat to our ecosystems (air, water, and soil) and living creatures ( 121 ).

In 2018, during the first WHO Global Conference on Air Pollution and Health, the WHO's General Director, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, called air pollution a “silent public health emergency” and “the new tobacco” ( 122 ).

Undoubtedly, children are particularly vulnerable to air pollution, especially during their development. Air pollution has adverse effects on our lives in many different respects.

Diseases associated with air pollution have not only an important economic impact but also a societal impact due to absences from productive work and school.

Despite the difficulty of eradicating the problem of anthropogenic environmental pollution, a successful solution could be envisaged as a tight collaboration of authorities, bodies, and doctors to regularize the situation. Governments should spread sufficient information and educate people and should involve professionals in these issues so as to control the emergence of the problem successfully.

Technologies to reduce air pollution at the source must be established and should be used in all industries and power plants. The Kyoto Protocol of 1997 set as a major target the reduction of GHG emissions to below 5% by 2012 ( 123 ). This was followed by the Copenhagen summit, 2009 ( 124 ), and then the Durban summit of 2011 ( 125 ), where it was decided to keep to the same line of action. The Kyoto protocol and the subsequent ones were ratified by many countries. Among the pioneers who adopted this important protocol for the world's environmental and climate “health” was China ( 3 ). As is known, China is a fast-developing economy and its GDP (Gross Domestic Product) is expected to be very high by 2050, which is defined as the year of dissolution of the protocol for the decrease in gas emissions.

A more recent international agreement of crucial importance for climate change is the Paris Agreement of 2015, issued by the UNFCCC (United Nations Climate Change Committee). This latest agreement was ratified by a plethora of UN (United Nations) countries as well as the countries of the European Union ( 126 ). In this vein, parties should promote actions and measures to enhance numerous aspects around the subject. Boosting education, training, public awareness, and public participation are some of the relevant actions for maximizing the opportunities to achieve the targets and goals on the crucial matter of climate change and environmental pollution ( 126 ). Without any doubt, technological improvements makes our world easier and it seems difficult to reduce the harmful impact caused by gas emissions, we could limit its use by seeking reliable approaches.

Synopsizing, a global prevention policy should be designed in order to combat anthropogenic air pollution as a complement to the correct handling of the adverse health effects associated with air pollution. Sustainable development practices should be applied, together with information coming from research in order to handle the problem effectively.

At this point, international cooperation in terms of research, development, administration policy, monitoring, and politics is vital for effective pollution control. Legislation concerning air pollution must be aligned and updated, and policy makers should propose the design of a powerful tool of environmental and health protection. As a result, the main proposal of this essay is that we should focus on fostering local structures to promote experience and practice and extrapolate these to the international level through developing effective policies for sustainable management of ecosystems.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

IM is employed by the company Delphis S.A. The remaining authors declare that the present review paper was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Home — Essay Samples — Environment — Air Pollution — Air Pollution: Causes, Effects, And Solutions

test_template

Air Pollution: Causes, Effects, and Solutions

  • Categories: Air Pollution Environmental Issues Pollution

About this sample

close

Words: 1158 |

Published: Feb 8, 2022

Words: 1158 | Pages: 2 | 6 min read

Table of contents

Causes and effects of air pollution, possible solutions to the problem of air pollution.

This essay explores the critical issue of air pollution, emphasizing human activities as the primary contributors, including fossil fuel combustion, industrial emissions, and transportation. It discusses the harmful effects of air pollution on human health, the environment, and global ecosystems, highlighting the urgency of addressing this global crisis. Offering practical solutions, such as adopting renewable energy sources and implementing cleaner technologies, the essay serves as a problem and solution essay example detailed , advocating for collective action to mitigate the adverse effects of air pollution and protect the planet for future generations.

Works Cited

  • Begum, B. A., & Hill, J. A. (2019). Air Pollution and Public Health: A Primer. In Air Pollution and Health (pp. 3-22). Elsevier.
  • Bhaskar, A., & Upadhyay, R. (2021). Air Pollution: Causes, Impacts and Control Measures. In Environmental Pollution and Control Measures (pp. 29-52). Springer.
  • Chakraborty, S., & Pervez, S. (2019). Impact of Air Pollution on Human Health and Environment: An Overview. In Environmental Impact of Chemical Pollution (pp. 3-24). Elsevier.
  • Dockery, D. W., & Pope III, C. A. (2020). Air Pollution and Health. In Air Pollution and Health (pp. 23-35). Elsevier.
  • Garg, A., Martin, R. V., & Crounse, J. D. (2021). Air Pollution and Its Effects on Climate and Health. In Climate and Air Pollution (pp. 1-21). Springer.
  • Hidy, G. M., & Pennell, W. T. (2020). Air Pollution: Chemicals and Particles in Ambient Air and Their Health Effects. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Health (pp. 22-31). Elsevier.
  • Kampa, M., & Castanas, E. (2020). Human Health Effects of Air Pollution. Environmental Pollution, 151, 362-367.
  • Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., & Pozzer, A. (2015). The Contribution of Outdoor Air Pollution Sources to Premature Mortality on a Global Scale. Nature, 525(7569), 367-371.
  • Pruss-Ustun, A., Wolf, J., Corvalan, C., Bos, R., & Neira, M. (2016). Preventing Disease through Healthy Environments: A Global Assessment of the Burden of Disease from Environmental Risks. World Health Organization.
  • World Health Organization. (2018). Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease. World Health Organization.

Image of Alex Wood

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

  • 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
  • Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

author

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

  • Expert in: Environment

writer

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 536 words

2 pages / 718 words

3 pages / 1393 words

2 pages / 1259 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Air Pollution: Causes, Effects, and Solutions Essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Air Pollution

Air pollution is a significant global problem that affects the health of millions of people, damages the environment, and costs billions of dollars. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), outdoor air pollution causes [...]

The air we breathe today is full of toxic and hazardous pollution. Pollution is a big problem to our health and the environment. Pollution is created by individuals, communities or industries that collect and dispose pollutants [...]

Traffic jams are the bane of urban existence, causing frustration, wasted time, and environmental damage. As cities continue to grow, the problem of traffic congestion becomes increasingly dire. This essay explores the causes [...]

As the world grapples with the escalating crisis of climate change, the term "carbon footprint" has become increasingly prevalent in both academic and public discourse. A carbon footprint refers to the total amount of [...]

Carbon is critical to sustain a huge range of Earth’s functions. It is abundant in the atmosphere (air), biosphere (living and dead organisms), hydrosphere (oceans, rivers, and lakes), and lithosphere (soli and rocks). These act [...]

Pakistan, a nation characterized by its rich cultural heritage and diverse landscapes, is grappling with a growing concern – the environmental challenges plaguing its big cities. As these urban centers continue to swell with [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

  • Instructions Followed To The Letter
  • Deadlines Met At Every Stage
  • Unique And Plagiarism Free

effects of air pollution on animals essay

  • Air & Climate
  • Drinking Water
  • Environmental Management
  • Health & Safety
  • Monitoring & Testing
  • Soil & Groundwater
  • Waste & Recycling
  • Water & Wastewater
  • Water Monitoring
  • Water Pumping
  • Air & Climate
  • Acid Gas Emissions Control
  • Activated Carbon Air Treatment
  • Activated Carbon Gas Treatment
  • Activated Carbon Treatment
  • Activated Carbon VOC Treatment
  • Aerobiology
  • …and more
  • Applications
  • Atmospheric Water Generation
  • Bottled Water
  • Communal Water
  • Developing Countries Water
  • Domestic Drinking Water
  • Acoustic Bird Control
  • Air Modeling
  • Air Quality Reporting
  • Aquatic Waste Collectors
  • Archaeology
  • Asbestos Compliance
  • Health & Safety
  • Absorbent Polymers
  • Accident Compliance
  • Accident Monitoring
  • Accident Regulations
  • Accidental Release
  • Acid Safety
  • Monitoring & Testing
  • 3D Measurement
  • 3D Scanning
  • Absorptiometers
  • Absorption Monitoring
  • Accelerometers
  • Acetonitrile Monitoring
  • Soil & Groundwater
  • 3D Groundwater
  • Acid Mine Drainage
  • Airborne Geophysics
  • Anaerobic Bioremediation
  • Aquifer Characterization
  • Aquifer Monitoring
  • Waste & Recycling
  • Acid Recycling
  • Acoustic Cleaning
  • Aerobic Biodegradation
  • Aerobic Waste
  • Aerosol Cans Disposal
  • Water & Wastewater
  • Acidic Wastewater Treatment
  • Activated Carbon Filtration
  • Activated Carbon Water Treatment
  • Activated Sludge
  • Activated Sludge Monitoring
  • Air and Water Quality Monitoring
  • Algae Bloom Monitoring
  • Aquatic Monitoring
  • Automatic Water Sampling
  • Ballast Water Monitoring
  • Axial Pumps
  • Backwashing Pumps
  • Balancing Valve
  • Booster Pumps
  • Cavity Pumps

Logo Environmental XPRT

  • … and more
  • Environmental XPRT Search
  • List your business
  • Email marketing

Oizom Instruments Pvt. Ltd.

  • Oizom Instruments Pvt. Ltd.
  • Effect of air pollution on plants and ...

Effect of air pollution on plants and animals

Effect of air pollution on plants and animals

Courtesy of Oizom Instruments Pvt. Ltd.

Air pollution, emerging as a formidable adversary to global ecosystems, is primarily born from the unbridled activities of industrialisation, urban sprawl, and transport congestion. Both plants and animals, the core pillars of our ecological fabric, grapple with the multidimensional repercussions of deteriorating air quality. A profound understanding of these ramifications is imperative, offering pathways for mitigation and conservation.

Reduced Photosynthesis and Growth

Photosynthesis, the very cornerstone of plant life, ensures growth and nourishment. This process is imperilled by particulate matter, ozone, sulphur dioxide , and nitrogen oxides. These agents often hamper the chlorophyll’s absorption capability, derailing the natural process of converting light to chemical energy.

Furthermore, studies have illuminated that a 10% reduction in photosynthesis can lead to a consequential 5-8% decline in crop yield. For instance, nutrient-rich crops like soybeans have significantly reduced yield, even in mildly polluted environments.

Air pollutants’ insidious nature means they can settle onto the leaf surfaces, initiating a sequence of deleterious effects. The visible symptoms are manifold, from necrotic spots and premature leaf drop to yellowing and stippling. These damages disrupt essential functions like transpiration, making plants vulnerable to heat stress, nutrient deficiencies, and subsequent illnesses.

From the larger perspective of an ecosystem’s vitality, air pollution’s effect on plant reproduction is severely unsettling. Pollutants can distort the structural integrity of pollens, debilitating their function. With compromised pollen health, plants face daunting challenges in reproduction. A cascading effect ensues, with herbivores facing food shortages, further affecting the predators that depend on them.

In the US, certain plant species, like the Black Cherry, have displayed extensive foliar injury in areas with dense ozone concentrations. Another species, the Eastern White Pine, bears witness to the devastating effects of sulphur dioxide, with its needles showing evident signs of discolouration and damage.

Drawing parallels to humans, animals too are victim to the respiratory onslaught posed by air pollutants. Chronic exposure can evoke myriad ailments, from bronchitis and asthma to irreversible lung damage. This has been observed across species, from pigeons in metropolitan areas to deer in more semi-urban locales.

As the realm of research broadens, evidence suggesting the neurotoxicity of certain air pollutants in animals is mounting. Urban birds, for example, have manifested alterations in their songs, which could impede mating rituals. On the dermatological front, particulate matter can trigger skin irritations, reducing the creature’s overall fitness.

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in polluted air pose another grave threat. Animals exposed to these agents can experience hormonal imbalances, impacting reproduction, development, and survival. Notably, amphibians have displayed alarming vulnerabilities, with observed skewed sex ratios and limb deformities.

The weakening of animal immune systems due to pollutants increases susceptibility to various diseases. A quintessential example lies in the amphibian populations of the US. With compromised immunity, these animals have succumbed to fungal diseases at an unprecedented rate, leading to sharp population declines.

The US paints a grim portrait of wildlife affected by air pollution. Birds like sparrows and kestrels inhabiting urban territories have exhibited diminished hatch rates. Aquatic ecosystems haven’t been spared either. Fish populations in areas like Chesapeake Bay grapple with the after-effects of nitrogen oxide emissions, leading to algal blooms and the subsequent depletion of oxygen, endangering marine life.

The battle against air pollution in the US has seen the fortification of regulations, with the Clean Air Act being a prime example. The confluence of technology and stringent policy-making offers hope. In this nexus, real-time air quality monitoring emerges as the frontline defence, equipping authorities and communities with real-time insights and data for actionable interventions.

Oizom, at the cusp of environmental technology, offers unparalleled air quality monitors powered by AI and IoT. Their devices provide real-time, accurate readings and encompass a range from industrial terrains to public recreational spaces, ensuring holistic coverage.

Join the vanguard against air pollution with Oizom’s cutting-edge solutions Click here .

The labyrinth of challenges posed by air pollution requires a multifaceted approach. While the journey is arduous, the amalgamation of community engagement, robust policies, and technological spearheads like Oizom can chart a roadmap toward cleaner air and a restored environment.

For a future where every breath counts, delve into Oizom’s air quality innovations today Learn More.

Most popular related searches

  • air pollution
  • real-time air quality monitoring
  • air quality monitor
  • air quality monitoring
  • NOx emissions
  • air quality regulations
  • endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • particulate matter
  • real-time air monitor
  • Placeholder

Customer comments

No comments were found for Effect of air pollution on plants and animals . Be the first to comment!

Great! comment successfully added!

The captcha is not valid

Doubleclick image

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Effects Of Air Pollution On Animals

This study, conducted in 1961, summarizes the knowledge at the time about the effects of air pollution on animals. This is one of the only major studies that addresses the issue of animals and air pollution.

This articles summarizes the outcome of major air pollution disasters and provides a review of animal-based laboratory experiments. The author finds that a dearth of knowledge regarding the specific characteristics of each animal species, as well as other environmental factors, influence the effects that air pollution will have on animals.

Highlights from media coverage of the study :

  • A well-known smog incident in Donora, PA in 1948 is known to have made 15% of dogs sick and even killed 10 dogs out of the 229 included in survey records. Sicknesses included respiratory and digestive issues as well as refusal to eat. Out of 165 cats included in survey records, 12 got sick and 3 died. Poultry farmers also reported that their birds got sick, and 40% of those sick birds died.
  • The sulfur dioxide from the London fog incident of 1952 reportedly affected cattle with bronchiolitis, emphysema, and heart failure. Some cattle died or were euthanized.
  • In 1950 in Poza Rica, Mexico, hydrogen sulfide is reported to have killed 100% of canaries and approximately 50% of other animals who were exposed to the pollution.
  • In lab tests, ozone has been shown to adversely affect dogs, cats, guinea pigs, rabbits and mice. It impacted their respiratory systems and also led to deaths.

effects of air pollution on animals essay

E.J. Catcott, World Health Organization, 1961 Worldwide|United States (National)

Related Posts

effects of air pollution on animals essay

May 11 2023  |  Daniel Souzza

How Oil Well Noise Pollution Impacts Songbirds

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Oct 18 2021  |  Teresa Gallo

Which Foods Cause The Most Air Pollution?

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Jan 28 2021  |  Siobhan Ballan

How Does Eating Meat Contribute To Nitrogen Pollution?

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Dec 11 2020  |  Trent Davidson

The Effects Of Human Pollution On Dolphins And Whales

effects of air pollution on animals essay

May 19 2020  |  Faunalytics

Plastic Pollution In The Coral Triangle

effects of air pollution on animals essay

May 6 2019  |  Emily Hatch

Light Pollution And Moth Behavior

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Feb 18 2016  |  karol orzechowski

The Effects Of Domestic Violence On Companion Animals

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Mar 13 2014  |  Faunalytics

Looking Beyond the Mortality of Bycatch: Sublethal Effects of Incidental Capture on Marine Animals

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Jul 26 2012  |  Faunalytics

Top Environmental Priorities Should Be Air And Water Pollution

effects of air pollution on animals essay

May 15 2012  |  Faunalytics

Ammonia Sources In The California South Coast Air Basin And Their Impact On Ammonium Nitrate Formation

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Mar 10 2011  |  Faunalytics

Veterinary Care For Horse Transportation By Air

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Oct 13 2009  |  Faunalytics

The Effects Of Animals On Human Health And Well-Being

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Donate to Faunalytics today

Support Our Work

Your donation saves animals and empowers advocates

Informed Action. Greater Reaction.

Post Office Box 152703, San Diego, CA 92195

Contact Faunalytics

© 2023 Faunalytics | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Effective Advocacy Animals Used For Food Companion Animals Animals Used in Science Wild Animals Other Topics

What We Do Board & Staff Research In Progress Press Volunteer With Us Shop

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Don’t Miss a Thing

Faunalytics delivers the latest and most important information directly to your inbox. Choose what topics you want to see and how often you get our emails, and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Air Pollution Effects on Terrestrial and Aquatic Animals

Cite this chapter.

effects of air pollution on animals essay

  • James R. Newman ,
  • R. Kent Schreiber &
  • E. Novakova  

315 Accesses

6 Citations

6 Altmetric

Air pollution has adversely affected animals since the advent of the industrial revolution (Newman 1980). Currently, the greatest threat to animal biodiversity from air pollution occurs in industrial countries where regional impacts (e.g., acid precipitation, ozone) are causing widespread direct and indirect effects to animals and their habitats. In Eastern Europe, local, regional, and transboundary air pollution is severe. Future threats will occur as underdeveloped countries that have minimal air pollution controls industrialize. Of particular concern are those areas, such as the tropical forest of the Amazon Basin, that harbor the world’s greatest biodiversity including many species yet to be described (Wilson 1988).

The beauty and genius of a work of art may be reconceived, though its first material expression be destroyed; a vanished harmony may yet again inspire the composer; but when the last individual of a race of living things breathes no more, another heaven and another earth must pass before such a one can be again. William Beebe (1906)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
  • Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Albers, P.H., and R.M. Prouty. 1987. Survival of spotted salamander eggs in temporary woodland ponds of coastal Maryland. Environ. Pollut . 46:45–61.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Allaway, W.H. 1970. Sulphur-selenium relationships in soils and plants. Sulphur Inst. J . 6 (3): 3–5.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Altshuller, A.P., and R.A. Linthurst, eds. 1984. The acidic deposition phenomena and its effects: Critical assessment review papers . Vol. 2, Effects sciences. NCSU Acid Precipitation Program, Raleigh, NC. US EPA Office of Research and Development: EPA Report No. 600/883–0168BF.

Google Scholar  

Alvo, B. 1987. The acid test. Living Bird Q . 6:25–30.

Andersen, T., and G.E. Ellefsen. 1982. Industrial melanism in Oligia-latruncula Lepidoptera Noctuidae in the greenland area southeastern Norway . Copenhagen: Zoologisk Museum.

Andren, C., M. Marden, and G. Nilson. 1989. Tolerance to low pH in a population of moor frogs, Rana arvalis , from an acid and a neutral environment: A possible case of rapid evolutionary response to acidification. Oikos 56:215–23.

Article   Google Scholar  

Arbib, R. 1980. The blue list for 1980. Am. Birds 33:830–35.

Avery, M., and R.K. Schreiber. 1979. The Clean Air Act: Its relation to fish and wildlife resources . US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, National Power Plant Team: FWS/OBS-76/20.8.

Babinska-Werka, J., and K. Czamowska. 1988. Heavy metals in roe-deer liver and alimentary tract and their content in soil and plants in central Poland. Acta Theriol . 15 (33): 219–30.

Baker, J.P. 1991. Biological effects of changes in surface water acid-base chemistry. In Acidic deposition: State of science and technology Summary report of the U.S. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program , ed. P.M. Irving. Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program.

Baker, J.P., D.P. Bernard, S.W. Christensen, M.J. Sale, J. Freda, K. Heitcher, D. Marmorek, L. Rowe, P. Scanlon, G. Suter, W. Warren-Hicks, and P. Welboum. 1990. Biological effects of changes in surface water acid-base chemistry . Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP) Report 13.

Baker, J.P., and C.L. Schofield. 1985. Acidification impacts on fish populations-A review. In Acid deposition: Environmental , economic , and policy issues , ed. D.D. Adams and W.P. Page. New York: Plenum Publishing.

Balazova, G., and E. Hluchan. 1969. Der einfluss von fluorexhalten auf die tiere in der umgebung einer alumininumfabrik (The influence of fluoride emissions on the animals in the vicinity of an aluminum factory). In Proceedings of the First European Congress on the Influence of Air Pollution . Wageningen, Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing.

Banfield, A.W.F. 1974. The mammals of Canada . National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museum of Canada. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.

Bassus, W. 1968. Uber wirkungen von industrieexhalton auf den nematodenbesatz im boden von kiefemwaldern (On the effects of industrial emissions on the population of nematoda in the soil of pine forests). Pedobiologia 8:289–95.

Beebe, W. 1906. The bird , its form and function . New York: H. Holt and Co.

Book   Google Scholar  

Beebee, T.J.C., R.J. Flower, A.C. Stevenson, S.T. Patrick, P.G. Appleby, C. Fletcher, C. Marsh, J. Natkanski, B. Rippey, and R.W. Battarbee. 1990. Decline of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita in Britain: Paleocological, documentary and experimental evidence for breeding site acidification. Biol. Conserv . 53:1–20.

Beebee, TJ.C., and J.R. Griffin. 1977. A preliminary investigation into natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) breeding site characteristics in Britain. J. Zool. (Lond.) 181:341–50.

Bendell, B.E., and D.K. McNicol. 1987. Fish predation and the composition of aquatic insect assemblages. Hydrobiologia 150:193–202.

Bengtsson, G., S. Nordstrom, and S. Rundgren. 1983. Population density and tissue metal concentration of Lumbricids in forest soils near a brass mill. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A Ecol. Biol . 30:87–108.

Bernes, C., and E. Thomelof. 1990. Present and future acidification in Swedish lakes: Model calculations based on an extensive survey. In Impact models to assess regional acidification , ed. J. Karnali Portrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bevanger, K., and O. Albu. 1986. Decrease in a Norwegian feral mink, Mustela vison , population-A response to acid precipitation. Biol. Conserv . 38:75–78.

Beyer, W.N., and A. Anderson. 1985. Toxicity to wood lice of zinc and lead oxides added to soil litter. Ambio 14:173–74.

Beyer, W.N., L.H. Pattee, L. Sileo, D.J. Hoffman, and B.M. Mulhern. 1985. Metal contamination in wildlife living near two zinc smelters. Environ. Pollut. Ser. A Ecol. Biol . 38A:63–86.

Bicknell, W.B. 1984. A cooperative hydrogen-sulfide monitoring study: The Lone Butte oil field , McKenzie County , ND . US Fish and Wildlife Service, Habitat Resources Field Office, Bismarck, ND.

Bishop, J.A., L.M. Cook, and J. Muggleton. 1978. The response of two species of moths to industrialization in northwest England. II. Relative fitness of morphs and population size. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond . 13:517–42.

Bjorge, R.R. 1987. Bird kill at an oil industry flare stack in northwest Alberta. Can. Field-Nat . 101 (3): 346–50.

Blancher, P.J., and D.G. McAuley. 1987. Influence of wetland acidity on avian breeding success. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf . 52:628–35.

Bloomfield, J.A., S.O. Quinn, R.J. Scrudata, D. Long, A. Richards, and F. Ryan. 1980. Atmospheric and watershed inputs of mercury to Cranberry Lake, St. Lawrence County, New York. In Polluted rain , ed. T.Y. Toribara, M.W. Miller, and P.E. Morrow. New York: Plenum Press.

Blus, L.G., C.J. Henny, and B.M. Mulhem. 1987. Concentrations of metals in mink and other mammals from Washington and Idaho. Environ. Pollut . 44:307–18.

Botkin, D.B., D.A. Woodby and R.A. Nisbet. 1991. Kirtland’s warbler habitats: A possible early indicator of climatic warming. Biol. Conserv . 56:63–78.

Brakefield, P.M., and D.R. Lees. 1987. Melanism in Adalia ladybirds and declining air pollution in Birmingham. Heredity 59:273–77.

Brush, T., and E.W. Stiles. 1986. Using food abundance to predict habitat use by birds. In Wildlife 2000: Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates , ed. J. Vemer, M.L. Morrison, and C.J. Ralph. International Symposium, 7–11 October 1984, Stanford Sierra Camp, Fallen Leaf Lake, CA. Madison, WI: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.

Bull, K.R., R.D. Roberts, M.J. Inskip, and G.T. Goodman. 1977. Mercury concentrations in soil, grass, earthworms and small mammals near an industrial emission source. Environ. Pollut . 12:135–40.

Burton, T.M., and G.E. Likens. 1975. Salamander populations and biomass in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Copeia 1975:541–46.

Carlson, C.E., and J.E. Dewey. 1971. Monitoring fluoride pollution in Flathead National Forest and Glacier National Park . USDA, Insect and Disease Branch, Division of State and Private Forestry, Forest Service, Missoula, MT.

Carriere, D., K. Fischer, D. Peakall, and P. Angehrn. 1986. Effects of dietary aluminum in combination with reduced calcium and phosphorous on the ring dove (Streptopelia risoria) . Water Air Soil Pollut . 30:757–64.

Chilgren, J.D. 1979. Small mammal investigation at ZAPS: Demographic studies and responses to gradient levels of SO 2 . In The bioenvironmental impacts of a coal fired power plant , 4th Interim Report, December 1978, Colstrip, MT, ed. E.M. Preston and T.L. Gullet. US EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis: EPA Report No. 600/3–79–044.

Chlodny, J., I. Matuszczyk, B. Styfi-Bartkiewicz, and D. Syrek. 1987. Catchability of the epigeal fauna of pine stands as a bioindicator of industrial pollution of forests. Ekol. Pol . 35:271–90.

Clark, D.R. 1979. Lead concentrations: Bats vs. terrestrial small mammals collected near a major highway. Environ. Sci. & Technol . 13:338–41.

Clark, K.L., and K. Fischer. 1981. Acid precipitation and wildlife . Draft Report No. 43. Ottowa, ON: Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service.

Cleve, K. 1970. Die erforschung der ursachen fur das auftreten melanistischer schmetterlingformen im laufe der letzen hundert jahre (Investigation of the reasons for melanic forms of butterflies in the course of the last hundred years). Z. Angew. Entomol . 65:371–87.

Cooke, L.M., G.S. Mani, and M.E. Varley. 1986. Postindustrial melanism in the peppered moth. Science 231:611–13.

Cooke, A.S., and J.F.D. Frazer. 1976. Characteristics of newt breeding sites. J. Zool. (Lond.) 178:223–36.

Corn, P.S., and R.B. Bury. 1987. The potential role of acidic precipitation in declining amphibian populations in the Colorado Front Range. In Aquatic effects task group VI peer review summaries . 17–23 May 1987, New Orleans, LA. Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program.

Corn, P.S., and F.A. Vertucci. In press. Descriptive risk assessment of the effects of acid deposition on Rocky Mountain amphibians. J. Herpetol .

Cowling, E.B. 1982. Acid precipitation in historical perspective. Environ. Sci. & Tech . 16:11023.

Cowling, E.B. 1989. Recent changes in chemical climate and related effects on forests in North America and Europe. Ambio 18:167–71.

Cramp, S., and J. Gooders. 1967. The return of the house martin. Lond. Bird Rep . 31:93–98.

Crete, M., R. Nault, P. Walsh, J.L. Benedetti, M.A. Lefebvre, J.P. Weber, and J. Gagnon. 1989. Variation in cadmium content of caribou tissues from northern Quebec. Sci. Total Environ . 80:103–12.

Cristaldi, M., E. D’Arcangelo, L.A. Ieradi, D. Mascanzoni, T. Mattei, and I. Van Axel Castelli. 1990. Cs determination and mutagenicity tests in wild Mus musculus domesticus before and after the Chernobyl accident. Environ. Pollot . 64:1–9.

Czechoslovak Academy of Science. 1989. Stay a vyvoj zivotniho prostredi v Ceskoslovensku (State of the development of environment in Czechoslovakia) . Cesky Svaz Ochrancu Prirody. Prague, Czechoslovakia: Creske Budejovice.

Dale, J.M., B. Freedman, and J. Kerekes. 1985. Experimental studies of the effects of acidity and associated water chemistry on amphibians. Proc. Nova Scotian Inst. Sci . 35:35–54.

Davies, E.B., and J.H. Watkinson. 1966. Uptake of native and applied selenium by pasture species. II. Effects of sulphate and of soil type on uptake by clover. New Zealand J. Agric. Res . 8:641–45.

Davis, D.D., and R.G. Wilhour. 1976. Susceptibility of woody plants to sulfur dioxide and photochemical oxidants. US EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis: EPA Report No. 600/3–76–102.

DeMent, D.H., J.J. Chisolm, J.C. Barber, and J.D. Strandberg. 1986. Lead exposure in an “urban” peregrine falcon and its avian prey. J. Wildl. Dis . 22:238–44.

DesGranges, J.L. 1987. Forest birds as biological indicators of the progression of maple dieback in Quebec. In The value of birds , ed. A.W. Diamond and F.L. Filion. International Council for Bird Preservation (ICBP), Technical Publication 6. Cambridge, England.

DesGranges, J.L., and M. Darveau. 1985. Effect of lake acidity and morphometry on the distribution of aquatic birds in southern Quebec. Holarct. Ecol . 8:181–90.

DesGranges, J.L., and M.L. Hunter. 1987. Duckling response to lake acidification. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf . 52:636–44.

DesGranges, J.L., Y. Mauffette, and G. Gagnon. 1987. Sugar maple forest decline and implications for forest insects and birds. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf . 52:677–89.

DesGranges, J.L, and J. Rodrigue. 1986. Influence of acidity and competition with fish on the development of ducklings in Quebec. Water Air Soil Pollut . 30:743–50.

Dewey, J.E. 1973. Accumulation of fluoride by insects near an emission source in western Montana. Environ. Entomol . 2 (2): 179–82.

Dickson, W. 1985. Liming in Sweden. In Liming acidic waters: Environmental and policy concerns. Rochester, NY: Center for Environmental Information.

Dietrich, J., and H. Eilenberg. 1986. Habicht-Mauserfedern als hochintegrierende, standardisierte umweltproben. Verh. Ges. Oekol . (Hohenheim 1984) Band XIV 1986:413–26.

Douwes, P., K. Mikkola, B. Petersen, and A. Vestergren. 1976. Melanism in Biston betularius from north-west Europe (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Entomol. Scand . 7:261–66.

Drablos, D., and A. Tollan, eds. 1980. Ecological impacts of acid precipitation. Proceedings of an International Conference, Sandefjord, Norway. SNSF Project, AS-NLH, Norway.

Drent, P.J., and J.W. Woldendorp. 1989. Acid rain and eggshells. Nature 339:431.

Dvorak, A.J., B.G. Lewis, P.C. Chee, E.H. Dettmann, R.F. Freeman III, R.M. Goldstein, R.R. Hinchman, J.D. Jastrow, F.C. Kornegay, D.L. Mabes, P.A. Merry, E.D. Pentecost, J.C. Prioleau, L.F. Soholt, W.S. Vinikour, and E.W. Walbridge. 1978. Impacts of coal-fired power plants on fish , wildlife , and their habitats . US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, National Power Plant Team: FWS/OBS-78/29.

Eilers, J.M., G.J. Lien, and R.G. Berg. 1984. Aquatic organisms in acidic environments: A literature review . Wisconsin Department Natural Resources Technical Bulletin 150.71.

Eisler, R. 1985a. Selenium hazards to fish , wildlife , and invertebrates: A synoptic review . Contaminant Hazard Reviews Report No. 5, Biological Report 85 (1.5). Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Eisler, R. 1985b. Cadmium hazards to fish , wildlife , and invertebrates: A synoptic review . Contaminant Hazard Reviews Report No. 2, Biological Report 85 (1.2). Laurel, MD: US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Eisler, R. 1985c. Chromium Hazards to Fish, Wildlife and Invertebrates: A Synoptic Review . Contaminant Hazard Reviews Report No. 6, Biological Report 85 (1.6). Laurel, MD: US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Engblom, E., and P. Lingdell. 1984. The mapping of short-term acidification with the help of biological pH indicators. In Report No. 61 , Institute of Freshwater Research , ed. L. Nyman. Drottningholm, Sweden: National Swedish Board of Fisheries.

Eriksson, M.O.G., L. Henrikson, B.I. Nilsson, G. Mymon, H.G. Oscarson, and A.E. Stenson. 1980. Predatory-prey relations important for biotic changes in acidified lakes. Ambio 9:248–49.

Fennelly, P.F. 1976. The origin and influence of airborne particulates. Am. Sci . 64:46–55.

Feriancova-Masarova, Z., and E. Kalivodova. 1965. Niekolko poznamok vplyve fluorovych exhalatov v okoli hlinikame v Ziari nad Hronom na kvantitu hniezdiacich vtakov (The effects of exhalations from the aluminum plant in Ziar nad Hronom on the spectrum of bird species in the vicinity of the plant). Biologia (Bratisl.) 20:341–46.

Fjellhelm, A., and G.G. Raddum. 1990. Acid precipitation: Biological monitoring of streams and lakes. Sci. Total Environ . 96:57–66.

Flousek, J. 1989. Impact of industrial emissions on bird populations breeding in mountain spruce forests in Central Europe. Ann. Zool. Fenn . 26:255–63.

Flueck, W.T. 1990. Possible impact of emissions on trace mineral availability to free-ranging ruminants: Selenium as an example (in German). Z. Jagdwiss . 36:179–85.

Frank A., L. Petersson, and T. Momer. 1981. Lead and cadmium contents in organs of moose, roe deer, and hare (in Swedish). Sven. Veterinartidn . 33:151–56.

Freda, J. 1986. The influence of acidic pond water on amphibians: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut . 30:439–50.

Freda, J. 1991. The effects of aluminum and other metals on amphibians. Environ. Pollut 71:305–28.

Freda, J., and W.A. Dunson. 1986. Effects of low pH and other chemical variables on the local distribution of amphibians. Copeia 2:454–66.

Freitag, R., and L. Hastings. 1973. Ground beetle populations near a kraft mill. Can. Eruomol . 105:299–310.

Frenette, J.J., Y. Richard, and G. Moreau. 1986. Fish responses to acidity in Quebec lakes: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut . 30:461–75.

Fritz, E.S. 1980. Potential impacts of low pH on fish and fish populations . US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, National Power Plant Team: FWS/OBS-80/40.2.

Fritz-Sheridan, R.P. 1985. Impact of simulated acid rains on nitrogenase activity in Peltigera aphthosa and P. polydactyla. Lichenologist (Lond.) 17:27–31.

Gibson, J.H., J.N. Galloway, C. Schofield, et al. 1983. Rocky Mountain acidification study . US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Biological Services, Eastern Energy and Land Use Team: FWS/OBS-80/40.17.

Gilbert, O.L. 1986. Field evidence for and acid rain effect on lichens. Environ. Pollut. (Series A) 40:227–31.

Gissel-Nielsen, G. 1973. Uptake and distribution of added selenite and selenate by barley and red clover as influenced by sulfur. J. Sci. Food Agric . 24:649–55.

Glooschenko, V., P. Blancher, J. Herskowitz, R. Fulthorpe, and S. Rang. 1986. Association of wetland acidity with reproductive parameters and insect prey of the eastern kingbird (Tyrannus tyrannus) near Sudbury, Ontario. Water Air Soil Pollut . 30:553–67.

Gooders, J. 1968. The swift in central London. Birds (Lond.) 32:93–98.

Gordon, C.C. 1969a. Cominco American report II . Department of Environmental Studies, Univ. of Montana, Missoula.

Gordon, C.C. 1969b. East Helena report . Department of Environmental Studies, Univ. of Montana, Missoula.

Goriup, P.D. 1989. Acidic air pollution and birds in Europe. Oryx 23:83–86.

Graveland, J. 1990. Effects of acid precipitation on reproduction in birds. Experientia (Basel) 46:962–70.

Greer, K.R. 1955. Yearly food habits of the river otter in the Thompson Lakes region, northwestern Montana, as indicated by scat analysis. Am. Midi. Nat . 54:299–313.

Grodzinska, K. 1977. Changes in the forest environment in southern Poland as a result of steel mill emissions. In Vegetation science and environmental protection , ed. A. Miyawaki and R. Tuxen. Proceedings of the International Symposium in Tokyo on Protection of the Environment and Excursion on Vegetation Science through Japan, 1974. Maruzen, Tokyo.

Grodzinska, K., W. Grodzinski, and S.I. Zeveloff. 1983. Contamination of roe deer forage in a polluted forest of southern Poland. Environ. Pollut. (Series A) 30:257–76.

Hagstrom, T. 1977. Grodomas forsvinnande i en forsuard sjo (The extinction of frogs in a lake acidified by atmospheric pollution). Sver. Nat . 11:367–69.

Hahn, E., K. Hahn, and H. Ellenberg. 1989. Schwermetallgehalte in federn von elstern (Pica pica): Folge exogener auflagerung aus der atmosphare? (Heavy metal in the feathers of the magpie (Pica pica): Consequence of exogenous deposition from the atmosphere). Verh. Ges. Oekol . (Essen 1988) Band XVIII.

Hahn, E., K. Hahn, and M. Stoeppler. 1989. Schwermetalle in federn von habichten (Accipiter gentilis) aus unterschiedlich belasteten gebieten (Heavy metals in the feathers of the hawk (Accipiter gentilis) from different contaminated regions). J. Ornithol . 130:303–9.

Haines, T.A. 1981. Acidic precipitation and its consequences for aquatic ecosystems: A review. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc . 110 (6): 79–93.

Haines, T.A. 1983. Organochlorine residues in brook trout from remote lakes in the northwestern United States. Water Air Soil Pollot . 20:47–54.

Haines, T.A., and J.P. Baker. 1986. Evidence of fish population responses to acidification in the eastern United States. Water Air Soil Pollot . 31:605–29.

Hais, K., and J. Masek. 1969. Vcinky nekterych exhalaci na hospodarska zvirata (Effects of some exhalations on agricultural animals). Ochr. Ovzduzi 3:122–25.

Hall, R.J., and K.R. Kelson. 1975. The mammals of North America . New York: Ronald Press Co.

Hall, R.J., and G.E. Likens. 1980. Ecological effects of whole-stream acidification. In Atmospheric sulfur deposition: Environmental impacts and health effects , ed. D.S. Shriner, C.R. Raymond, and S.E. Lindberg. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science.

Hansen, P.W. 1987. Acid rain and waterfowl: The case for concern in North America . Arlington, VA: Izaak Walton League of America.

Haramis, G.M., and D.S. Chu. 1987. Acid rain effects on waterfowl: Use of black duck broods to assess food resources of experimentally acidified wetlands. In The value of birds , ed. A.W. Diamond and F.L. Filion. International Council for Bird Preservation (ICBP) Technical Publication No. 6. Cambridge, England.

Harr, J.R. 1978. Biological effects of selenium. In Toxicity of heavy metals in the environment , ed. F.W. Ochme. New York: M. Dekker.

Harris, R.D. 1971. Birds collected (die off) at Prince Rupert , British Columbia , September 1971 . Unpublished Final Report Vancouver, BC: Canadian Wildlife Service.

Harte, J., and E. Hoffman. 1989. Possible effects of acidic deposition on a Rocky Mountain population of the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tiginum) . Conserv. Biol . 3:149–58.

Henrikson, L., H.G. Oscarson, and J.A.E. Stenson. 1980. Does the change of predator system contribute to the biotic development in acidified lakes? In Ecological impacts of acid precipitation , ed. D. Drablos and A. Tollen. Proceedings of International Conference, Sandefjord, Norway. SNSF Project, As-NLH, Norway.

Herbert, D.M., and I.M. Cowan. 1971. White muscle disease in the mountain goat. J. Wildl. Manage . 34 (4): 752–56.

Hillman, R.C., and A.W. Benton. 1972. Biological effects of air pollution on insects, emphasizing the reaction of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) to sulfur dioxide. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc . 88:195.

Hindawi, I. 1970. Air pollution injury to vegetation . US Public Health Service, Environmental Health Service, National Air Pollution Control Administration, Raleigh, NC.

Hirao, Y., and C.C. Patterson. 1974. Lead aerosol pollution in the High Sierra overrides natural mechanisms which exclude lead from a food chain. Science 184:989–92.

Honek, A. 1975. Color polymorphism in Adalia bipunctata Coleoptera Coccinellidae in Bohemia Czechoslovakia. Entomol. Ger . 1 (3–4): 293–99.

Hooper, E.T. 1942. The water shrew (Sorer palustris) of the southern Allegheny Mountains. Occas. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univer. Mich . 463:1–4.

Hunsaker, C.T., and D.E. Carpenter. 1990. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program ecological indicators . US EPA Report No. 60013–90/060.

Hunsaker, C.T., R.L. Graham, G.W. Suter II, R.V. O’Neill, B.L. Jackson, and L.W. Barnthouse. 1990. Regional ecological risk assessment: Theory and demonstration . ORNL,/TM-11128.Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Hutton, M. 1982. The role of wildlife species in the assessment of the biological impact of chronic exposure to persistent chemicals. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 6:471–78.

Interagency Task Force on Acid Precipitation. 1982. National acid precipitation assessment plan . Washington, DC: Interagency Task Force on Acid Precipitation.

Jackson, D.R., and A.P. Watson. 1977. Disruption of nutrient pools and transport of heavy metals in a forested watershed near a lead smelter. J. Environ. Qual . 6:331–38.

Jenkins, D.W. 1980. Biological monitoring and surveillance . Biological monitoring of toxic metals, vol. 1. US EPA Office of Research and Development EPA Report No. 600/3–80–089.

Johnson, A.H., T.G. Siccama, R.S. Turner, and D.G. Lord. 1984. Assessing the possibility of a link between acid precipitation and decreased growth rates of trees in the northeastern United States. In Direct and indirect effects of acidic deposition on vegetation , ed. R. Linthurst. Acid Precipitation Series vol. 5. Mn Arbor, MI: Butterworth Publishers.

Johnson, D.H. 1951. The water shrews of the Labrador Peninsula. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash . 64:109–16.

Johnson, M.G. 1987. Trace metal loadings to sediments of fourteen Ontario lakes and correlation with concentrations in fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci . 44:3–13.

Jop, K. 1979. Quality evaluation of roe-deer antlers from an industrial region in southern Poland. Acta Theriol . 24:23–24.

Jordan, D. 1990. Mercury contamination: Another threat to the Florida panther . Technical Bulletin 15 (2). Washington, DC: US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Karstad, L. 1967. Fluorosis in deer (Odocoileus virginianus) . Bull. Wildl. Dis. Assoc . 3:42–46.

Karstad, L. 1970. Wildlife in changing environment. In Environmental change , focus on Ontario , ed. D.F. Elrich. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Kay, C.E. 1975. Fluoride distribution in different segments of the femur, metacarpus and mandible of mule deer. Fluoride 8 (2): 92–97.

Kay, C.E., P.C. Tourangeau, and C.C. Gordon. 1975. Industrial fluorosis in wild mule and whitetail deer from Western Montana. Fluoride 8:182–91.

Kelso, J.R.M., M.A. Shaw, C.K. Minns, and K.H. Mills. 1990. An evaluation of the effects of atmospheric acidic deposition on fish and the fishery resource of Canada. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci . 47:644–55.

Kerekes, J. In press. Possible correlation of summer loon population with the trophic state of a water body. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh .

Kettlewell, B. 1973. The evolution of melanism . Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kettlewell, H.B.D., and M.J. Heard. 1961. Accidental radioactive labelling of a migrating moth. Nature 189:676–77.

Keystone Report. 1991. Biological diversity on federal lands: Report of a Keystone Policy Dialogue . Colorado: Keystone Center.

Klausnitzer, B., and R. Schummer. 1983. Zum vorkommen der formen von Adalia bipunctata L. in der DDR (Insects, Coleoptera) (Occurrence of forms of Adalia bipunctata L. in DDR (Insects, Coleoptera)). Entomol. Nachr . 27:159–62.

Knudsen, G.J., and J.B. Hale. 1968. Food habits of otters in the Great Lakes Region. J. Wildl. Manage . 32:89–93.

Kolb, J.A., and M. White. 1975. Small mammals of the San Bernadino Mountains, California. Southwest. Nat . 19 (4): 112–14.

Kucera, E. 1983. Mink and otter as indicators of mercury in Manitoba waters. Can. J. Zool . 61:2250–56.

Larsson, P., L. Okla, and P. Woin. 1990. Atmospheric transport of persistent pollutants governs uptake by holarctic terrestrial biota. Environ. Sci. & Tech . 24:1599–601.

Lechowicz, MJ. 1981. The effects of simulated acid precipitation on photosynthesis in the caribou lichen, Cladina stellaris. Water Air Soil Pollut . 14:133–57.

Lees, D.R. 1974. Genetic control of the melanic forms of the moth Phigalia pilosaria (pedaria). Heredity 33:145–50.

Lees, D.R., and C.S. Dent. 1983. Industrial melanism in the spittlebug Philaenus spumarius homoptera Aphrophoridae. Bid. J. Linn. Soc . 19 (2): 115–30.

Leivestad, H., G. Hendrey, I.P. Muniz, and E. Snekvik. 1976. Effects of acid precipitation on freshwater organisms. In Impact of acid precipitation on forest and freshwater ecosystems in Norway , ed. F.J. Braekke. SNSF Project Report FR 6176. SNSF Project, As-NLH, Norway.

Lemberk, V. 1989. Comparison of the omithocenoses of spruce forest in Krkonose Mountains according to the emmisions damage degree. Opera Corcontica 26:131–43.

Lepage, P., and G.H. Parker. 1988. Copper, nickel, and iron levels in pelage of red squirrels living near the ore smelters at Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Zool . 66 (7): 1631–37.

Leuven, R.S.E.W., C. Hartog, M.M.C. Christiaans, and W.H.C. Helligers. 1986. Effects of water acidification on the distribution pattern and the reproductive success of amphibians. Experientia 42:495–503.

Leuven, R.S.E.W., and F.G.F. Oyen. 1987. Impact of acidification and eutrophication on the distribution of fish species in shallow and lentic soft waters of the Netherlands: An historical perspective. J. Fish Biol . 31:753–74.

Liebert, T.G., and P.M. Brakefield. 1987. Behavioural studies on the peppered moth Biston betularia and a discussion of the role of pollution and lichens in industrial melanism. Biol. J. Linn. Soc . 31:129–50.

Light, J.T. 1973. The effects of oxidant air pollution on forest ecosystems of the San Bemadino Mountains, Section B. In Oxidant air pollution effects on a western coniferous forest ecosystem: Task B report , ed. O.C. Taylor. Air Pollution Research Center, Univ. of California-Riverside.

Linscombe, G., N. Kinler, and R.J. Aulerich. 1983. Mink. In Wild mammals of North America: Biology , management , and economics , ed. J.A. Chapman and G.A. Feldhamer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lockerbie, D.M., and Clair, T.A. 1988. Organic contaminants in isolated lakes of southern Labrador, Canada. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol . 41:625–32.

Longcore, J.R., R.K. Ross, and K.L. Fischer. 1987. Wildlife resources at risk through acidification of wetlands. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf . 52:608–18.

Lowe, V.P.W., and A.D. Horrill. 1988. Ecological half-life of caesium in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) . Environ. Polka . 54:81–87.

MacArthur, R.H., and J.W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42:594–98.

Machie, D.W. 1960. Ostearius melanopygius (O.P.C.). Bull. Brit. Spider Study Group 8:3–4.

Marshall-Forbes, L. 1991. Unprecedented risks: The effects of global climate change on U.S. wildlife resources . Arlington, VA: Izaak Walton League of America.

Martin, A.C., H.S. Zim, and A.L. Nelson. 1951. American wildlife and plants: A guide to wildlife food habits . New York: Dover.

Martin, H.C., ed. 1987. Acidic precipitation . Parts 1 and 2. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Acidic Precipitation, Muskoka, Ontario, September 15–20, 1985. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.

Martin, M.H., and P.J. Coughtrey. 1975. Preliminary observations of the levels of cadmium in a contaminated environment. Chemosphere 4:155–60.

Martin, M.H., and P.J. Coughtrey. 1976. Comparison between levels of lead, zinc, and cadmium within a contaminated environment. Chemosphere 5:15–20.

Mascanzoni, D. 1987. Chernobyl’s challenge to the environment: A report from Sweden. Sci. Total Environ . 67:133–48.

Mason, C.F., and S.M. MacDonald. 1988. Radioactivity in otter scats in Britain following the Chernobyl reactor accident. Water Air Soil Pollut . 37:131–37.

Mason, C.F., and S.M. MacDonald. 1989. Acidification and otter (Lutra lutra) distribution in Scotland. Water Air Soil Pollut . 43:365–74.

Mattsson, P., L. Albanu, and A. Frank. 1981. Cadmium and some other elements in liver and kidney from moose (Alces alces) . Var Foda 33 (8–9): 335–49.

McNeely, J.A., K.R. Miller, W.V. Reid, R.A. Mittermeier, and T.B. Werner. 1990. Conserving the world’s biological diversity . Gland, Switzerland, and Washington, DC. Prepared and published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, World Resources Institute, Conservation International, World Wildlife Fund-U.S., and World Bank.

McNicol, D.K., B.E. Bendell, and D.G. McAuley. 1987. Avian trophic relationships and wetland acidity. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Na. Resour. Conf . 52:619–27.

McNicol, D.K., B.E. Bendell, and R.K. Ross. 1987. Studies of the effects of acidification on aquatic wildlife in Canada: Waterfowl and trophic relationships in small lakes in northern Ontario. Occasional Paper No. 62. Ottawa: Canadian Wildlife Service.

McNicol, D.K., P.J. Blancher, and B.E. Bendell. 1987. Waterfowl as indicators of wetland acidification. In The value of birds , ed. A.W. Diamond and F.L. Filion. International Council for Bird Preservation (ICBP) Technical Publication No. 6. Cambridge, England.

Mikkola, K. 1975. Frequencies of melanic forms of Oligia moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) as a measure of atmospheric pollution in Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn . 12:197–204.

Mikkola, K. 1984. Dominance relations among the melanic forms of Biston betularius and Odontopera bidentata (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). Heredity 52:9–16.

Mikkola, K. 1989. The first case of industrial melanism in the subarctic lepidopteran fauna: Xestia gelida f. inferna f . n. (Noctuidae). Not. Entomol . 69:1–3.

Mikkola, K., and A. Albrecht. 1986. Radioactivity in Finnish night-flying moths (Lepidoptera) after the Chernobyl accident. Not. Entomol . 66:153–57.

Mikkola, K., and A. Albrecht. 1988. The melanism of Adalia bipunctata Coleortera Coccinellidae around the Gulf of Finland as an industrial phenomenon. Ann. Zool. Fenn . 25 (2): 177–86.

Mikova, M., and E. Novakova. 1979. Variation of corneal glycosaminoglycan values of hares in relation to environmental pollution by industrial emissions. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 5:891–96.

Miller, P.R., ed. 1980. Proceedings of the Symposium on Effects of Air Pollutants on Mediterranean and Temperate Forest Ecosystems , 22–27 June 1980 . General Technical Report PSW-43, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experimental Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, Berkeley, CA.

Miller, P.R., and M.J. Eldemman, eds. 1977. Photochemical oxidant air pollutant effects on mixed conifer forest ecosystems: A progress report , 1976 . US EPA Report No. 600/3–77–104.

Miller, P.R., and J.R. McBride. 1975. Effects of air pollutants on forests. In Responses of plants to air pollution , ed. J.B. Mudd and T.T. Kozlowski. New York: Academic Press.

Minns, C.K., J.E. Moore, D.W. Schindler, and M.L. Jones. 1990. Assessing the potential extent of damage to inland lakes in eastern Canada due to acidic deposition, III: Predicted impacts on species richness in seven groups of aquatic biota. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci . 47:821–30.

Mitchell, B.A. 1989. Acid rain and birds: How much proof is needed? Am. Birds 43:234–41.

Miyamoto, Y. 1975. Kankyo osen no shihyo to siteno dobutsu kisetsu. Kanso-kuritsu kara mita nihon no osen bunpu (Animal phenology as an indicator of environmental pollution: Distribution of environmental pollution in Japan seen from frequency of observation). Tokyo Kanku Chiho Kisho Kenkyukai-shi (Geophysical Notes, Tokyo District Meteorological Observations) 8:27–29.

Murton, R.K., N.J. Westwood, and R.I.P. Thearle. 1973. Polymorphism and the evolution of a continuous breeding season in the pigeon, Columba livia. J. Reprod. Fertil . (Supplement) 19:563–77.

Naef-Daenzer, B., and M. Blattner. 1989. Spatial distribution of birds in relation to structure and damage of woodland, I: Oak-beech woods in northwestern Switzerland. Ornithol. Beob . 86:307–27.

National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP). 1990. Acidic deposition: State of \science and technology , Vol. 1–4. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Newman, J.R. 1977. Sensitivity of the house martin (Delichon urbica) to fluoride emissions. Fluoride 10 (2): 73–76.

Newman, J.R. 1979. Effects of industrial air pollution on wildlife. Biol. Conserv . 15:181–90.

Newman, J.R. 1980. Effects of air emissions on wildlife resources . US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, National Power Plant Team: FWSJOBS-80/40.1.

Newman, J.R. 1984. Fluoride standards and predicting wildlife effects. Fluoride 17:41–47.

Newman, J.R., and J.J. Murphy. 1979. Effects of industrial fluoride on black-tailed deer (preliminary report). Fluoride 12 (3): 129–35.

Newman, J.R., and E. Novakova. 1979. Effects of air pollution on nesting of the house martin (Delichon urbica). Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc., Gainesville, FL. Unpublished Report.

Newman, J.R., E. Novakova, M.K. Bergdoll, and M.T. Park. 1984. Ducks as site-specific bioindicators of trace metal pollution . Paper read at 5th Annual Meeting of the Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 4–7 November, Arlington, Virginia.

Newman, J.R., E. Novakova, and J.T. McClave. 1985. The influence of industrial air emissions on the nesting ecology of the house martin, Delichon urbica , in Czechoslovakia. Biol. Conserv . 31:229–48.

Newman, J.R., and R.K. Schreiber. 1984. Animals as indicators of ecosystem responses to air emissions. Environ. Manage . 8:309–24.

Newman, J.R., and R.K. Schreiber. 1988. Air pollution and wildlife toxicology: An overlooked problem. Environ. Toxicol. Chem . 7:381–90.

Newman, J.R., and M. Yu. 1976. Fluorosis in black-tailed deer. J.Wildl. D is . 12:39–41.

Nishino, O., M. Arari, I. Senda, and K. Kuboto. 1973. Kankyo osen no suzume ni oyobosu eikyo (Influence of environmental pollution on the sparrow). Jpn. J. Public Health 20 (10): 1.

Noss, R.F., and L.D. Harris. 1986. Nodes, networks, and MUMs: Preserving diversity at all scales. Environ. Manage . 10:299–309.

Novak, I., and K. Spitzer. 1986. Industrial melanism in Biston betularia Lepidoptera Geometridae in Czechoslovakia. Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov . 83 (3): 185–91.

Novakova, E. 1969. Influence des pollution industrielles sur les communautes animales et l’utilization des animaux comme bioindicateurs (Influence of industrial pollution on common animals and the utilization of these common animals as bioindicators). In Proceedings of the First European Congress on the Influence of Air Pollution . Wageningen, Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing.

Novakova, E. 1970. Influence of industrial air pollution on urine reaction in hares. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress on Nutrition . 1969, Prague.

Novakova, E., A. Finkova, and Z. Soya. 1973. Etude preliminaire des proteines sanguines chez le lievre commun expose aux pollutions industrielles (Preliminary study of blood proteins of the common hare exposed to industrial pollution). In Nemzetkozi Vadaszati Tudomanyos Korferencia Eloadasai 11. Sekio, Aprovadaszda Ikodas Sopron, Budapest, 1971.

Novakova, E., and R. Hanzl. 1974. Prispeved k urceni potencialu krajiny pro chov nekterych druhu zvere (Contribution on the determination of the potential landscape for management of certain game species.) Quaest. Geobiol . 13:7–81.

Novakova, E., and Z. Roubal. 1971. Taux de calcium et de phosphore dans le serum sanguin des lievres exposes aux pollutions de l’air (Calcium and phosphorus ratios in the blood serum of hares subject to air pollution). In Actes du X Congress Union Internationale Biologistes du Gibier . 3–7 May 1971, Paris.

Novakova, E., and B. Temmlova. 1973. Influence de la pollution de l’air sur la syngamosis du faison commun (Influence of air pollution on syngamosis in the common pheasant). In Actes du X Congress Union Internationale Biologistes du Gibier . 3–7 May 1971, Paris.

Nyholm, N.E.I. 1981. Evidence of involvement of aluminum in causation of defective formation of eggshells and of impaired breeding in wild passerine birds. Environ. Res . 26:36371.

Nyholm, N.E.I. 1987. Bio-indication of industrial emissions of heavy metals by means of insectivorous birds. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment , vol. 2, ed. S.E. Lindberg, and T.C. Hutchinson. Edinburgh, Scotland: CEP Consultants.

Nyholm, N.E.I., and H.E. Myhrberg. 1977. Severe eggshell defects and impaired reproductive capacity in small passerines in Swedish Lapland. Oikos 29:336–41.

Office of Technology Assessment. 1987. Technologies to maintain biological diversity . Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

O’Gara, G. 1982. Riley Ridge: Gas sours wildlife in Wyoming. High County News 14:10–11.

Oldfield, J.E. 1972. Selenium deficiency in soils and its effect on animal health. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull . 83:173–80.

Organ, J.F. 1989. Mercury and PCB residues in Massachusetts river otters: Comparisons on a watershed basis . Ph.D. diss., Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Ormerod, S.J., N. Allinson, D. Hudson, and S.J. Tyler. 1986. The distribution of breeding dippers (Cinclus cinclus [L.]; Aves) in relation to stream acidity in upland Wales. Freshwater Biol . 16:501–7.

Ormerod, S.J., K.R. Bull, C.P. Cummins, S.J. Tyler, and J.A. Vickery. 1988. Egg mass and shell thickness in dippers Cinclus cinclus in relation to stream acidity in Wales and Scotland. Environ. Pollut . 55:107–21.

Ormerod, S.J., and S.J. Tyler. 1987. Dippers (Cinclus cinclus) and grey wagtails (Motacilla cinerea) as indicators of stream acidity in upland Wales. In The value of birds , ed. A.W. Diamond and F.L. Filion. International Council for Bird Preservation (ICBP) Technical Publication No. 6. Cambridge, England.

Overrein, L.N., H.M. Seip, and A. Tollan. 1980. Acid precipitation-Effects on forest and fish . Final Report SNSF Project, 1972–1980. SNSF Project, As-NLH, Norway.

Peterle, T.J. 1991. Wildlife toxicology . New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Petersen R.C., Jr., Landner, L., and Blanck, H. 1986. Assessment of the impact of the Chernobyl reactor accident on the biota of Swedish streams and lakes. Ambio 15:327–31.

Phillips, K. 1990. Where have all the frogs and toads gone? Bioscience 40 (6): 422–24.

Pierce, B.A. 1985. Acid tolerance in amphibians. Bioscience 35:239–43.

Pierce, B.A., and J.M. Harvey. 1987. Geographic variation in acid tolerance of Connecticut wood frogs. Copeia 1987:94–103.

Popescu, C. 1979. Natural selection in the industrial melanic psocid Mesopsocus unipunctatus (Mull.) (Insecta: Psocoptera) in northern England. Heredity 42:133–42.

Popescu, C., E. Broadhead, and B. Shorrocks. 1978. Industrial melanism in Mesopsocus unipunctatus (Mull.) (Psocoptera) in northern England. Ecol. Entomol . 3:209–19.

Pough, F.H., and R.E. Wilson. 1977. Acid precipitation and reproductive success of Ambystoma salamanders. Water Air Soil Pollut . 7:307–16.

Prell, H. 1936. Die schadigung der tierwelt durch die fernwirkungen von industrieal gasen (Injury to the animal world through the distant effects of industrial waste gases). Arch. Gewerbepathol. Gewerbehyg . 7:656–70.

Raddum, G.G., and A. Fjellheim. 1984. Acidification and early warning organisms in freshwater in western Norway. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. Verh . 22:1973–80.

Rants, W.B., F.D. Tomassini, and E. Nieboer. 1978. Elevation of copper and nickel levels in primaries from black and mallard ducks collected in the Sudbury District, Ontario. Can. J. Zool . 56:581–86.

Rattner, B.A., G.M. Haramis, D.S. Chu, and C.M. Bunck. 1987. Growth and physiological condition of black ducks reared on acidified wetlands. Can. J. Zool . 65:2953–58.

Richardson, D.H.S., and C.M. Young. 1977. Lichens and vertebrates. In Lichen ecology , ed. M.R.D. Seaward. New York: Academic Press.

Richkind, K.E. 1979. Genetic responses to air pollution in mammalian populations. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.

Robinette, W.L., D.A. Jones, G. Rogers, and J.S. Gashwiler. 1957. Notes on tooth development and wear for Rocky Mountain mule deer. J. Wildl. Manage . 21:135–52.

Rodhe, H., and R. Herrera. 1988. Acidification in tropical countries . New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Rose, G.A., and G.H. Parker. 1982. Effects of smelter emissions on metal levels in the plumage of ruffed grouse near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Zool . 60:2659–67.

Sawicka-Kapusta, K. 1978. Estimation of the contents of heavy metals in antlers of roe deer from Silesian woods. Arch. Ochr. Srodowiska 1:107–21.

Sawicka-Kapusta, K. 1979. Roe deer antlers as bioindicators of environmental pollution in southern Poland. Environ. Pollut . 19 (4): 283–94.

Scanlon, P. 1979. Lead contamination of mammals and invertebrates near highways with different traffic volumes. In Animals as monitors of environmental pollutants . Symposium on Pathobiology of Environmental Pollutants: Animal Models and Wildlife as Monitors, University of Connecticut, 1977. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

Scanlon, P. 1990. Effects of acidification on wild mammals and waterfowl. In Biological effects of changes in surface water acid-base chemistry . State-of-Science/Technology Report 13. Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program.

Scheider, W.A., D.S. Jeffries, and P.J. Dillon. 1979. Effects of acidic precipitation on precambrian freshwaters in southern Ontario. J. Gt. Lakes Res . 5 (1): 45–51.

Scheuhammer, A.M. 1991. Effects of acidification on the availability of toxic metals and calcium to wild birds and mammals. Environ. Pollut . 71:329–75.

Schindler, D.W., S.E.M. Kaslan, and R.H. Hesslein. 1989. Biological impoverishment in lakes of the midwestem and northeastern United States from acid rain. Environ. Sci. Tech . 23:57380.

Schindler, D.W., K.H. Mills, D.F. Malley, D.L. Findlay, J.A. Shearer, I.J. Davies, M.A. Turner, G.A. Linsey, and D.R. Cruikshank. 1985. Long-term ecosystem stress: The effects of experimental acidification on a small lake. Science 228:1395–1401.

Schlesinger, W.H., and G.L. Potter. 1974. Lead, copper, and cadmium concentrations in small mammals in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. Oikos 25:148–52.

Schofield, C.L. 1978. Toxicity of metals. In Limnological aspects of acid precipitation , ed. G. Hendrey. Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Schreiber, R.K., and J.R. Newman. 1988. Acid precipitation effects on forest habitats: Implications for wildlife. Conserv. Biol . 2:249–59.

Schummer, R. 1976. On the problem of melanism in Biston betularia and Biston strataria Lepidoptera Geometridae in the area of East Germany. Dtsch. Entomol. Z . 23 (4–5): 281–94.

Scott, M.G., and T.C. Hutchinson. 1987. Effects of simulated acid rain episode on photosynthesis and recovery in caribou-forage lichens, Cladina stellaris (OPIZ) BRODO and Cladina rangiferina (L.) WIG-G. New Phytol . 107:567–75.

Shaw, G.G. 1981. The potential impact of sour gas plant aerial emissions on wildlife. In Effects of sour gas on wildlife , ed. V. Geist and A.H. Legge. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Univ. of Calgary Faculty of Environmental Design.

Sheldon, W.G., and W.G. Toll. 1964. Feeding habits of the river otter in a reservoir in central Massachusetts. J. Mammal . 45:449–55.

Siccama, T.G., M. Bliss, and H.W. Vogelmann. 1982. Decline of red spruce in the Green Mountains of Vermont. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 109:162–68.

Sigal, L.L., and J.W. Johnston, Jr. 1986a. Effects of acidic rain and ozone on nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis in the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria (L.) Hoffman. Environ. Exp. Bot . 26:5964.

Sigal, L.L., and J.W. Johnston, Jr. 1986b. Effects of simulated acidic rain on one species each of Pseudoparmelia, Usnea, and Umbilicaria. Water Air Soil Pollut . 27:315–22.

Singer, R., and K.L. Fischer. 1984. Other related biota. In The acidic deposition phenomena and its effects: Critical assessment review papers , ed. A.P. Altshuller and R.A. Linthurst. Vol. 2 , Effects Sciences . NCSU Acid Precipitation Program, Raleigh, NC. US EPA Office of Research and Development EPA Report No. 600/8–83–0168BF.

Smith, J.B., and D. Tirpak. 1989. The potential effects of global climate change on the United States . Report to Congress. US EPA Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, Office of Research and Development.

Smith, M.W., B.J. Wyskowski, C.M. Brooks, C.T. Driscoll, and C.C. Cosentini. 1990. Relationships between acidity and benthic invertebrates of low-order woodland streams in the Adirondack Mountains, New York. Can. J. Fish. Aqua t. Sci . 47:1318–29.

Smith, W.H. 1974. Air pollution-Effect on the structure and function of the temperate forest ecosystem. Environ. Pollut . 6:111–29.

Smith, W.H. 1990. Air pollution and forests: Interaction between air contaminants and forest ecosystems . New York: Springer-Verlag.

Sochasky, L., ed. 1981. Acid rain and the Atlantic salmon . IASF Special Publication Series, No. 10. St. Andrews, New Brunswick: International Atlantic Salmon Foundation.

Soholt, L.F., and S. Wiedenbaum. 1981. Oil shale: Its development and potential for air quality effects . US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, Eastern Energy and Land Use Team: FWS/OBS-81/34.

Spry, D.J., and J.G. Wiener. 1991. Metal bioavailability and toxicity to fish in low-alkalinity lakes: A critical review. Environ. Pollut . 71:243–304.

Stastny, K., and V. Bejcek. 1983. Bird communities of spruce forests affected by industrial emissions in the Krusne Hory (Ore Mountains). In Proceedings of the VIII International Conference. Bird census work and atlas work , ed. K. Taylor, R.J. Fuller, and P.C. Lake, pp. 243–53. B.T.O.

Stastny, K., V. Bejcek, and Z. Barta. 1987. Use of bird communities as the biodiagnostical indicator of the degree of affection of spruce forests in the Krusne hory (Ore Mountains) (in Czech with an English summary). Sbornik Ochrana Muzea 6/84:79–103.

Steele, C.W., S. Strickler-Shaw, and D.H. Taylor. 1989. Behavior of tadpoles of the bullfrog, Rana catesbelana , in response to sublethal lead exposure. Aquat. Toxicol . 14:331–44.

Stem, A.C., ed. 1977. Air pollution . 3rd ed. 2 vols. New York: Academic Press.

Steward, R.C. 1976. Experiments on resting site selection by the typical and melanic forms of the moth Allophyes oxyacanthae (Caradrinidae). J. Zool. (Lund.) 178:107–15.

Steward, R.C. 1977. Melanism and selective predation in three species of moth. J. Anim. Ecol . 46:483–96.

Stickel, W.H. 1975. Some effects of pollutants in terrestrial ecosystems. In Ecological toxicology research , ed. A.D. McIntyre and C.F. Mills. New York: Plenum Press.

St. Louis, V.L., L. Breebaart, and J.C. Barlow. 1990. Foraging behavior of tree swallows over acidified and nonacidified lakes. Can. J. Zool . 68:2385–92.

Stokes, P.M., E.T. Howell, and G. Krantzberg. 1989. Effects of acidic precipitation on the biota of freshwater lakes. In Acidic precipitation: Biological and ecological effects , ed. D.C. Adrlano and A.H. Johnson. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Stoszek, M.J., W.B. Kessler, and H. Willmes. 1978. Trace mineral content of antelope tissues. Proceedings of the Eighth Antelope States Workshop . Jasper, Alberta, May 1–4.

Stripp, R.A., M. Heit, D.C. Bogen, J. Bidanset, and L. Trombetta. 1990. Trace element accumulation in the tissues of fish from lakes with different pH values. Water Air Soil Pollut . 51:75–87.

Sullivan, T.J. 1991. Historical changes in surface water acid-base chemistry in response to acidic deposition . State of Science and Technology Report 11. Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program.

Suns, K., C. Curry, and D. Russell. 1980. The effects of water quality and morphometric parameters on mercury uptake by yearling yellow perch . Technical Report LTS 80–1. Rexdale, Ontario: Ontario Ministry of the Environment.

Swackhamer, D.L., and R.A. Hites. 1988. Occurrence and bioaccumulation of organochlorine compounds in fishes from Siskiwit Lake, Isle Royale, and Lake Superior. Environ. Sci Technol . 22 (5): 543–48.

Talmage, S.S., and B.T. Walton. 1991. Small mammals as monitors of environmental contaminants. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol . 119:47–145.

Tansey, M.F., and R.P. Roth. 1970. Pigeons, a new role in air pollution. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc . 20:307–9.

Taylor, O.C., ed. 1973. Oxidant air pollution effects on a western coniferous forest ecosystem . Task B Report. Air Pollution Research Center, Univ. of California, Riverside.

Tendron, G. 1964. Effects of air pollution on animals and plants. In European Conference on Air Pollution . Council of Europe Report No. A87–389. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.

Thompson, D.C., and K.H. McCourt. 1981. Seasonal diets of the porcupine caribou herd. Am. Midi. Nat . 105:70–76.

Tjell, J.C., T.H. Christensen, and R. Bro-Rasmussen. 1983. Cadmium in soil and terrestrial biota, with emphasis on the Danish situation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf . 7:122–40.

Tome, M.A., and F.H. Pough. 1982. Responses of amphibians to acid precipitation. In Acid rain fisheries , ed. R.E. Johnson. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Acidic Precipitation and Fishery Impacts, Cornell Univ., Aug. 5, 1981. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society.

Ulrich, B. 1982. Gefahren fur das waldokosystem durch saure niederchiage. In Immissionbelastungen von Waldokosystemen (a special 1982 number of) Landanstalt fur Okologie Landschaftenwicklung und Forstplanung Nordrhein-Westfalen . 4350 Recklinghausen, Federal Republic of Germany.

Urbanek, B. 1986. Mercury, lead and cadmium content in the plumage of pheasants and fur of hares in the Czech Socialist Republic. Prace Volhm 69:277–96.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1986. Second addendum to air quality criteria for particulate matter and sulfur oxides (1982): Assessment of newly available health effects information . US EPA Report No. 600/18–86/020F.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1990. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program overview . US EPA Report No. 600/9–90/001.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1990. New source review workshop manual: Prevention of significant deterioration and nonattainment area permitting . Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1991. National air quality and emissions trends report , 1989 . US EPA Report No. 450/4–91–003.

Villella, R.F. 1989. Acid rain publications by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service , 1979–1989 . US Fish and Wildlife Service: Biological Report 80(40.28).

Vogelmann, H.W. 1982. Catastrophe on Camel’s Hump. Natural History 91:8–14.

Walton, K.C. 1984. Fluoride in fox bone near an aluminum reduction plant in Anglesey, Wales, and elsewhere in the United Kingdom. Environ. Pollut. (Series B) 7:273–80.

Watt, W.D. 1987. A summary of the impact of acid rain on Atlantic salmon (Salmon salar) in Canada. Water Air Soil Pollut . 35:27–35.

Way, C.A., and G.D. Schroder. 1982. Accumulation of lead and cadmium in wild populations of the commensal rat , Rattus norvegicus. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol . 11:407–17.

Webster, I. 1963. Asbestos in non-experimental animals in South Africa. Nature (Lond.) 197:506.

Wellings, S.R. 1970. Respiratory damage due to atmospheric pollutants in the English sparrow, Passer domesticus . In Project clean air . Research Project S-25. Department of Pathology, Univ. of California, Davis.

Wiener, J.G. 1987. Metal contamination of fish in low-pH lakes and potential implications for piscivorous wildlife. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf . 52:645–57.

Wilson, E.O. 1988. The current state of biological diversity: In Biodiversity , ed. E.O Wilson and F.M. Peter, pp. 3–18. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Witkamp, M., M.L. Frank, and J.L. Shoopman. 1966. Accumulation and biota in a pioneer ecosystem of kudzu vine at Copperhill, Tennessee. J. Appl. Ecol . 3:383–91.

Woodwell, G.M. 1970. Effects of pollution on the structure and physiology of ecosystems. Science 168:429–33.

Wren, C.D. 1986. Mammals as biological monitors of environmental metal levels. Environ. Monit. Assess . 6:127–44.

Wren, C.D., H. MacCrimmon, R. Frank, and P. Suda. 1980. Total and methylmercury levels in wild mammals from the precambrian shield area of south-central Ontario, Canada. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol . 25:100–5.

Wren, C.D., H. MacCrimmon, and B. Loescher. 1983. Examination of bioaccumulation and biomagnification of metals in a precambrian shield lake. Water Air Soil Pollut . 19:277–91.

Wren, C.D., and P.M. Stokes. 1988. Depressed mercury levels in biota from acid and metal-stressed lakes near Sudbury, Ontario. Ambio 17:28–30.

Wren, C.D., P.M. Stokes, and K.L. Fischer. 1986. Mercury levels in Ontario mink and otter relative to food levels and environmental acidification. Can. J. Zool . 64:2852–59.

Wrigley, R.E. 1969. Ecological notes on the mammals of southern Quebec. Can. Field-Nat 83:201–11.

Wyman, R.L., and D.S. Hawksley-Lescault. 1987. Soil acidity affects distribution, behavior, and physiology of the salamander Plethodon cinereus. Ecology 68:1819–27.

Yan, N.D., W. Keller, H.J. Macisaac, and L.J. McEachern. 1991. Regulation of zooplankton community structure of an acidified lake by Chaoborus. Ecol. Abst . 1:52–65.

Yont, W.P., and R.R. Sayers. 1927. Hydrogen sulfide as a laboratory and industrial poison. J. Chem. Educ . 4:613–19.

Download references

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

U.S. EPA Environmental Research Laboratory, ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Corvallis, Oregon, USA

Jerry R. Barker

Environmental Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

David T. Tingey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Newman, J.R., Schreiber, R.K., Novakova, E. (1992). Air Pollution Effects on Terrestrial and Aquatic Animals. In: Barker, J.R., Tingey, D.T. (eds) Air Pollution Effects on Biodiversity. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3538-6_10

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3538-6_10

Publisher Name : Springer, Boston, MA

Print ISBN : 978-1-4613-6570-9

Online ISBN : 978-1-4615-3538-6

eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Publish with us

Policies and ethics

  • Find a journal
  • Track your research

ENCYCLOPEDIC ENTRY

Air pollution.

Air pollution consists of chemicals or particles in the air that can harm the health of humans, animals, and plants. It also damages buildings.

Biology, Ecology, Earth Science, Geography

Loading ...

Morgan Stanley

Air pollution consists of chemicals or particles in the air that can harm the health of humans, animals, and plants. It also damages buildings. Pollutants in the air take many forms. They can be gases , solid particles, or liquid droplets. Sources of Air Pollution Pollution enters the Earth's atmosphere in many different ways. Most air pollution is created by people, taking the form of emissions from factories, cars, planes, or aerosol cans . Second-hand cigarette smoke is also considered air pollution. These man-made sources of pollution are called anthropogenic sources . Some types of air pollution, such as smoke from wildfires or ash from volcanoes , occur naturally. These are called natural sources . Air pollution is most common in large cities where emissions from many different sources are concentrated . Sometimes, mountains or tall buildings prevent air pollution from spreading out. This air pollution often appears as a cloud making the air murky. It is called smog . The word "smog" comes from combining the words "smoke" and " fog ." Large cities in poor and developing nations tend to have more air pollution than cities in developed nations. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) , some of the worlds most polluted cities are Karachi, Pakistan; New Delhi, India; Beijing, China; Lima, Peru; and Cairo, Egypt. However, many developed nations also have air pollution problems. Los Angeles, California, is nicknamed Smog City. Indoor Air Pollution Air pollution is usually thought of as smoke from large factories or exhaust from vehicles. But there are many types of indoor air pollution as well. Heating a house by burning substances such as kerosene , wood, and coal can contaminate the air inside the house. Ash and smoke make breathing difficult, and they can stick to walls, food, and clothing. Naturally-occurring radon gas, a cancer -causing material, can also build up in homes. Radon is released through the surface of the Earth. Inexpensive systems installed by professionals can reduce radon levels. Some construction materials, including insulation , are also dangerous to people's health. In addition, ventilation , or air movement, in homes and rooms can lead to the spread of toxic mold . A single colony of mold may exist in a damp, cool place in a house, such as between walls. The mold's spores enter the air and spread throughout the house. People can become sick from breathing in the spores. Effects On Humans People experience a wide range of health effects from being exposed to air pollution. Effects can be broken down into short-term effects and long-term effects . Short-term effects, which are temporary , include illnesses such as pneumonia or bronchitis . They also include discomfort such as irritation to the nose, throat, eyes, or skin. Air pollution can also cause headaches, dizziness, and nausea . Bad smells made by factories, garbage , or sewer systems are considered air pollution, too. These odors are less serious but still unpleasant . Long-term effects of air pollution can last for years or for an entire lifetime. They can even lead to a person's death. Long-term health effects from air pollution include heart disease , lung cancer, and respiratory diseases such as emphysema . Air pollution can also cause long-term damage to people's nerves , brain, kidneys , liver , and other organs. Some scientists suspect air pollutants cause birth defects . Nearly 2.5 million people die worldwide each year from the effects of outdoor or indoor air pollution. People react differently to different types of air pollution. Young children and older adults, whose immune systems tend to be weaker, are often more sensitive to pollution. Conditions such as asthma , heart disease, and lung disease can be made worse by exposure to air pollution. The length of exposure and amount and type of pollutants are also factors. Effects On The Environment Like people, animals, and plants, entire ecosystems can suffer effects from air pollution. Haze , like smog, is a visible type of air pollution that obscures shapes and colors. Hazy air pollution can even muffle sounds. Air pollution particles eventually fall back to Earth. Air pollution can directly contaminate the surface of bodies of water and soil . This can kill crops or reduce their yield . It can kill young trees and other plants. Sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide particles in the air, can create acid rain when they mix with water and oxygen in the atmosphere. These air pollutants come mostly from coal-fired power plants and motor vehicles . When acid rain falls to Earth, it damages plants by changing soil composition ; degrades water quality in rivers, lakes and streams; damages crops; and can cause buildings and monuments to decay . Like humans, animals can suffer health effects from exposure to air pollution. Birth defects, diseases, and lower reproductive rates have all been attributed to air pollution. Global Warming Global warming is an environmental phenomenon caused by natural and anthropogenic air pollution. It refers to rising air and ocean temperatures around the world. This temperature rise is at least partially caused by an increase in the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases trap heat energy in the Earths atmosphere. (Usually, more of Earths heat escapes into space.) Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas that has had the biggest effect on global warming. Carbon dioxide is emitted into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels (coal, gasoline , and natural gas ). Humans have come to rely on fossil fuels to power cars and planes, heat homes, and run factories. Doing these things pollutes the air with carbon dioxide. Other greenhouse gases emitted by natural and artificial sources also include methane , nitrous oxide , and fluorinated gases. Methane is a major emission from coal plants and agricultural processes. Nitrous oxide is a common emission from industrial factories, agriculture, and the burning of fossil fuels in cars. Fluorinated gases, such as hydrofluorocarbons , are emitted by industry. Fluorinated gases are often used instead of gases such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). CFCs have been outlawed in many places because they deplete the ozone layer . Worldwide, many countries have taken steps to reduce or limit greenhouse gas emissions to combat global warming. The Kyoto Protocol , first adopted in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997, is an agreement between 183 countries that they will work to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions. The United States has not signed that treaty . Regulation In addition to the international Kyoto Protocol, most developed nations have adopted laws to regulate emissions and reduce air pollution. In the United States, debate is under way about a system called cap and trade to limit emissions. This system would cap, or place a limit, on the amount of pollution a company is allowed. Companies that exceeded their cap would have to pay. Companies that polluted less than their cap could trade or sell their remaining pollution allowance to other companies. Cap and trade would essentially pay companies to limit pollution. In 2006 the World Health Organization issued new Air Quality Guidelines. The WHOs guidelines are tougher than most individual countries existing guidelines. The WHO guidelines aim to reduce air pollution-related deaths by 15 percent a year. Reduction Anybody can take steps to reduce air pollution. Millions of people every day make simple changes in their lives to do this. Taking public transportation instead of driving a car, or riding a bike instead of traveling in carbon dioxide-emitting vehicles are a couple of ways to reduce air pollution. Avoiding aerosol cans, recycling yard trimmings instead of burning them, and not smoking cigarettes are others.

Downwinders The United States conducted tests of nuclear weapons at the Nevada Test Site in southern Nevada in the 1950s. These tests sent invisible radioactive particles into the atmosphere. These air pollution particles traveled with wind currents, eventually falling to Earth, sometimes hundreds of miles away in states including Idaho, Utah, Arizona, and Washington. These areas were considered to be "downwind" from the Nevada Test Site. Decades later, people living in those downwind areascalled "downwinders"began developing cancer at above-normal rates. In 1990, the U.S. government passed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. This law entitles some downwinders to payments of $50,000.

Greenhouse Gases There are five major greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere.

  • water vapor
  • carbon dioxide
  • nitrous oxide

London Smog What has come to be known as the London Smog of 1952, or the Great Smog of 1952, was a four-day incident that sickened 100,000 people and caused as many as 12,000 deaths. Very cold weather in December 1952 led residents of London, England, to burn more coal to keep warm. Smoke and other pollutants became trapped by a thick fog that settled over the city. The polluted fog became so thick that people could only see a few meters in front of them.

Media Credits

The audio, illustrations, photos, and videos are credited beneath the media asset, except for promotional images, which generally link to another page that contains the media credit. The Rights Holder for media is the person or group credited.

Illustrators

Educator reviewer, last updated.

March 6, 2024

User Permissions

For information on user permissions, please read our Terms of Service. If you have questions about how to cite anything on our website in your project or classroom presentation, please contact your teacher. They will best know the preferred format. When you reach out to them, you will need the page title, URL, and the date you accessed the resource.

If a media asset is downloadable, a download button appears in the corner of the media viewer. If no button appears, you cannot download or save the media.

Text on this page is printable and can be used according to our Terms of Service .

Interactives

Any interactives on this page can only be played while you are visiting our website. You cannot download interactives.

Related Resources

Language selection

  • Français fr

Air pollution: effects on wild animals

Animals, or wildlife, are vulnerable to harm from air pollution. Pollutant issues of concern include acid rain , heavy metals , persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and other toxic substances.

Insects, worms, clams, fish, birds and mammals, all interact with their environment in different ways. As a result, each animal's exposure and vulnerability to the impacts of air pollution can be equally different.

Air pollution can harm wildlife in two main ways.

  • It affects the quality of the environment or habitat in which they live
  • It affects the availability and quality of the food supply

How air pollution harms habitat

Habitat is the place in which animals live, including in and on the soil, as well as in water.

Acid rain can change the chemistry and quality of soils and water . For example, water bodies can become too acidic for some animals to survive or have normal physiological functions. Alternatively, acid rain can increase the release of heavy metals, such as aluminum, from soils into water habitats. The result is higher availability of heavy metals in the water column, which are very toxic to many animals including fish.

Some heavy metals, such as mercury , can be transported in the air long distances away from emission sources.

Although not as well understood, other forms of air pollution, such as smog , particulate matter , and ground-level ozone , to mention a few, likely affect wildlife health in similar ways to human health including harming the lungs and cardiovascular systems. An animal's vulnerability to air pollution is influenced by how it breathes - whether it uses lungs, gills or some other form of gas exchange, such as passive diffusion across the surface of the skin.

How air pollution harms food supply and quality

Many heavy metals , toxics , persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and other air pollutants affect wildlife by entering the food chain and damaging the supply and quality of food.

Once consumed, many of these pollutants collect and are stored within the animal's tissues. As animals are eaten by other animals along the food chain, these pollutants continue to collect and increase in concentration. This process is called bioaccumulation. Top level predators such as bears and eagles, among many others, are particularly susceptible to the bioaccumulation of these types of air pollutants.

For example, mercury is of great enough concern that it is recommended we limit how often we eat certain types of fish that may contain high levels of heavy metal.

Air pollutants can poison wildlife through the disruption of endocrine function, organ injury, increased vulnerability to stresses and diseases, lower reproductive success, and possible death.

Changes in the abundance of any species because of air pollution can dramatically influence the abundance and health of dependent species. For example, the loss of some species of fish because of higher levels of aluminum may allow insect populations to increase, which may benefit certain types of ducks that feed on insects. But the same loss of fish could be detrimental to eagles, ospreys and many other animals that depend on fish as a source of food.

It is very difficult to fully understand and appreciate how far and in what ways such changes will affect other species throughout the ecosystem, including humans.

Page details

effects of air pollution on animals essay

What Are The Effects Of Air Pollution On Animals?

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Pollution comes in many forms, from plastic pollution to chemical substances entering our waterways. But one of the biggest forms of pollution is pollution of the air. This is a growing global environmental problem which comes in many forms and therefore causes many different direct and indirect problems. We now know many of these pollutants are having adverse effects on our own health and so this raises the question that, if air pollution is so bad for us, what are the effects of air pollution on animals?

In short, air pollution affects animals both directly and indirectly and the amount it affects a certain animal will vary greatly depending on a number of factors. Direct effects include:

  • Inhalation of gases and particles in the air
  • Ingestion of particles in food or water
  • Absorption of gases through the skin

Indirect effects include:

  • Climate change

Ocean acidification

Ozone layer depletion.

As you can see there are plenty of potential effects of air pollution on animals. Some of these are quite well understood and some are not. In this article, I will briefly try and summarise what we know.

What is an air pollutant?

A substance that causes air pollution is known as an air pollutant and is defined as:

“a substance in the air that can have damaging effects on humans and the wider ecosystem”.

This could be a solid particle, such as dust or soot emitted from a coal-fired power station. But it could also be a gas, invisible to the naked eye, such as carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), the most well known ‘greenhouse gas’.

It is important to note that for a substance to be an air pollutant, it doesn’t have to have originated from human activities. Natural air pollutants also occur such as when a volcano erupts, or a forest fire begins naturally, this has been a natural process for a long time before humans were affecting animals (we are just making things much worse!).

The difference between primary pollutants and secondary pollutants.

Any substance directly emitted and instantly having adverse effects are primary pollutants. Secondary pollutants are caused by these primary pollutants reacting with another substance causing a new pollutant to form.

Tropospheric ozone or ground level ozone is an example of a secondary pollutant that forms near the earth’s surface when other primary pollutants react.

What are the main air pollutants?

Before we can understand why pollutants can have adverse effects on animals we need to have a quick rundown of the main culprits.

Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) – gas

I’m sure you have all heard of this one. The most well known of all the greenhouse gases .

Abundant in the atmosphere already, but thanks to us humans, now in far greater quantities following the industrial revolution and the rise in factories and vehicles emitting the gas at an alarming rate.

Nitrogen Oxides – gas

Another group of pollutants which includes nitrous oxide (N 2 O).

Nitrogen and oxygen are commonly found particles in the atmosphere which don’t react together at normal temperatures. However, under extreme temperatures (such as those found in a power plant or a car engine) they do and are released into the air.

Nitrous Oxide is actually a greenhouse gas with 298 times the ability of CO 2 when it comes to trapping heat (over a 100 year period). However, it is currently in much lower quantities than CO 2 and so is only thought to have 1/3 the effect on climate.

Sulphur Dioxide – gas

This is another one you may well have come across. Sulphur dioxide does not float around in the air like CO 2 however it does enter the atmosphere naturally during volcanic eruptions.

However, we have been adding significantly to the quantity of this pollutant by burning coal and petroleum to produce power.

Methane (CH 4 ) and other Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) – gas

Another group of pollutants that contribute to the greenhouse effect.

Methane directly and the other VOCs with their ability to form ozone which makes methane last longer in the atmosphere.

Some of the main human-made sources of methane are decomposing food/ waste in landfill and also from animal agriculture (farting cows basically).

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

You may (and if not probably should) have a carbon monoxide detector in your home. This is because carbon monoxide is a colourless, odourless and yet extremely deadly gas and can be formed when burning natural gas (such as in an oven).

The main man-made source of CO though is within vehicle exhaust fumes.

Airborne particulates

Unlike the invisible gases mentioned above, airborne particulates are very small particles of solid or liquid that are light enough to be suspended in the air for a length of time. Soot or dust are common examples of this type of pollutant.

These are produced naturally from volcanoes and forest fires and then by humans when we burn anything, such as in power plants.

So far I have mentioned some of the main offenders, but there are many more air pollutants on top of that including:

  • Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) produced by refrigerators and aerosols
  • Ammonia from farm waste
  • Free radicals from burning fossil fuels

And the list goes on. But now we know the main air pollutants that we as humans have contributed towards over the years what are the effects of them on animals?

Direct effects of air pollution on animals

In humans, the direct health effects of air pollution are becoming more well known. With respiratory disease, heart disease and lung cancer among the worst.

The air pollutants responsible for these diseases are the airborne particles but also the nitrogen oxides emitted by road vehicles.

But as we are only really just beginning to understand the effects on humans the effects on most animals are still not that well known.

Pet animals

The effect of air pollution on pets, which spend much of their time in the same environments to humans, you would expect to be similar.

And studies have found adverse effects on dogs. A study in Mexico City, a city with notoriously high levels of air pollution, compared dogs living in the city with dogs living in an unpolluted area. They found that dogs in the polluted areas had inflamed brains and other signs indicative of disease (1). But there are still very few studies on the subject.

Indoor pollutants are also bad for pet animals with a study on cats showing a decrease in lung capacity when sharing a home with a smoker . So when a study showed that on a day in Beijing with particularly high pollution, standing outside is the equivalent of smoking 1.5 cigarettes an hour. From this, we can infer that when air pollution is bad it must surely have an adverse effect on these animals as well.

Arguably even more at risk to the direct effects of air pollution are birds. Unlike pets, they don’t spend time indoors and are often resident in our cities where air pollution levels are high.

A study in the early 1990s examined the effects in quite an extreme way by placing caged birds (coal tits and rock buntings) within close vicinity of a working coal-fired power plant. The mixture of particulates, nitrous oxide and sulphur dioxide was shown to have adverse effects on the respiratory system of the birds (2).

More recently in 2017, a paper compiled a series of studies of air pollutants on birds dating back as far as 1950 and found consistent evidence of adverse effects. Effects included respiratory illness, affected immune systems, changes in behaviour and less success in laying eggs and therefore producing young ( 3 ).

The same study mentioned above where birds were placed in cages by a coal-fired power station was repeated on small mammals (wood mice and house mice). Yet again the pollutants caused respiratory problems.

A study in Sao Paolo, Brazil, (another city with high levels of air pollution) placed mice outside in cages for 4 months. One cage with filtered clean air and the other with unfiltered polluted air. The study found that when exposed to the unfiltered air from an early age, the reproductive success of the females went down (4).

The indirect effects of air pollution on animals

This is where it starts to get complicated. It gets complicated because everything in the environment is inter-connected making it very hard to pinpoint exactly how these pollutants are indirectly affecting animals.

If air pollution is affecting just the tiniest of microbes, that could still have indirect implications for other animals further up the food chain. So I won’t try and explain every single impact in this article but I’ll highlight a few of the more interesting/ concerning.

Indirect effects caused by climate change

As mentioned earlier in the article, many of the man-made air pollutants contribute to the greenhouse effect. Acting as a blanket in the atmosphere trapping heat in. The more of these gases we release the worse this effect becomes.

The warming effect caused by this is what we refer to as ‘global warming’ although because the earth’s climate is a complex system of weather patterns, climate can be effective in many different ways and all these can affect wildlife.

The number of studies linking climate change to impacts on wildlife is increasing all the time. The key thing to remember again is that everything is linked and so if climate change starts to affect even the smallest plants or insects, it will also more than likely affect the largest animals eventually.

Many species have evolved together over millions of years, with certain insects relying on certain plants to survive. If those plants are impacted by warming temperatures the insects will suffer and then the animal which eats the insects may also suffer, you get the picture. It doesn’t take much, a slight change in the life cycle of one animal can completely ruin that of another if they can’t alter to be in sync.

One of the main effects of climate change that has been observed is a change in range, i.e where certain animals are found. A study in Britain of 329 different species showed that 275 moved further north, most likely due to the warmer climate .

Rising ocean temperatures are causing corals, which are the foundation of huge ecosystems, to ‘bleach’. This is where corals expel algae living in their tissues leaving them looking white or ‘bleached’. This doesn’t kill the corals straight away but does lead to a higher rate of mortality .

The list of impacts is vast and ever growing. But as I say the important thing to note with all these indirect impacts is the fact that the slightest change to one plant or animal species can affect many others.

Other indirect effects of air pollution on animals

Ocean acidification occurs when the increasing amount of CO 2 from air pollution is absorbed by the oceans. The absorption of CO 2 changes the pH of the seawater i.e makes it more acidic.

As with climate change if this change occurred slowly, like it might have done before humans arrived, then animals could potentially adapt to the different conditions. However, these changes are happening rapidly thanks to all the air pollution we are causing and animals just can’t adapt quickly enough.

This more acidic water makes it difficult for animals to create shells, and has actually been found to start dissolving the shells of existing ones (5).

The acidic water has also been found to alter other important functions of reef fish such as communication and reproduction .

Acid rain is formed when sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide air pollution combines with water in the atmosphere causing it to become acidic. When this water falls as rain it can then have some bad consequences for wildlife.

The clearest effects of this are on aquatic animals in streams, lakes, swamps and marshes. The acid rain has been found to react with soils to release aluminium which washes into waterways. This aluminium causes acidification and has effects on the survival of fish eggs for example.

The more acidic water also causes more mucus buildup on the gills of adult fish. This affects their ability to absorb oxygen and they can suffocate. This has lead to some pretty apocalyptic scenes of dead fish floating on the surface of ponds and lakes.

More acidic conditions have also lead to impacts on frogs, snails and other species. Frogs are slightly more resilient to acidic conditions than fish, but the shallow ponds they use to breed can be more rapidly affected by acid rain which quickly makes it impossible for frogs and other amphibians to breed in them.

Ozone (O 3 ) is a molecule in the atmosphere that occurs naturally and forms a layer, known as the ozone layer, that acts to absorb potentially harmful UVB rays from the sun. Those rays that cause us to tan (or burn) although too many of which would cause us to be covered in skin cancer.

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are an air pollutant released by refrigerators and aerosols. These are broken down in the atmosphere to form, among other things, chlorine. The chlorine reacts with the ozone and this converts it to oxygen which no longer provides the protection from those UVB rays.

So what does this mean for wildlife?

Well it has been shown to affect the development of plants, which you now know will consequently affect many animal species too. It has also been shown to have effects on marine life (6).

More recent findings of the effects of air pollution on animals include:

Some air pollutants (such as ozone) have been found to interact with and break down the scent molecules produced by plants that bees use to find their food. This increases the amount of time they have to spend foraging and therefore causes a decrease in average lifespan (7).

Another study showed that plants in urban areas with high levels of nitrogen dioxide produced more chemicals to help defend themselves against insects that want to eat them. (8)

The list goes on.

Negative feedback cycles

Just to make things look even bleaker I need to mention negative feedback cycles. These are effects that are triggered by the things I have already mentioned that make things worse and worse.

One example is that as temperatures on the earth rise due to climate change ice begins to melt at the earth’s poles. Now as you know ice is white, and as you will also know a white surface is very good at reflecting sunlight. You might notice this on a hot day if you touch a black car and a white car, the black car will be hotter as it has absorbed more heat, whereas the white car will be cooler as it has reflected it. This is known as the ‘albido effect’.

Once ice has melted you are left with the earth’s surface or an ocean exposed underneath. Neither of these surfaces is as good at reflecting the heat of the sun as ice and so less heat energy is reflected back, more is absorbed and the earth heats up even more. Hence the term ‘negative feedback cycle’.

The list of the effects of air pollution on animals just keeps growing, as scientists carry out more studies and we see the effects of a longer time period (remember man-made air pollution is still a relatively recent phenomenon).

The fact is that the direct impacts of these substances are bad enough for many animals, but the indirect effects are making things even worse.

As I mentioned already animals and ecosystems have adapted to changing conditions on earth for millions of years. But those changes have mostly been slow. And when they have been rapid, such as when a large volcano erupts, this has lead to mass extinctions.

Since we started burning fossil fuels and producing motor vehicles, changes have been rapid and animals simply can’t keep up.

It is therefore clear that the effects of air pollution on animals is very bad indeed and I’m sure further studies will show those effects to be even worse than we think now. The quickest solution is to stop our pollution outputs as quickly as we can.

We have started to do this with some success in some areas. Bans on CFCs in some countries have led to a halt of ozone layer depletion and we are seeing the harmful UVB radiation reduced as a result of that. But for some other pollutants such as CO 2, because the effects perhaps aren’t so immediately obvious to humans, the desire to stop producing them is not enough.

We need to work hard to find solutions and to change policy to stop the effects of air pollution before it is too late. If not for ourselves, for the animals.

  • Calderón-Garcidueñas, Lilian, et al. “Air pollution, cognitive deficits and brain abnormalities: a pilot study with children and dogs.” Brain and cognition  68.2 (2008): 117-127.
  • Llacuna, S., et al. “Effects of air pollution on passerine birds and small mammals.”  Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology  24.1 (1993): 59-66.
  • Sanderfoot, Olivia V., and Tracey Holloway. “Air pollution impacts on avian species via inhalation exposure and associated outcomes.”  Environmental Research Letters  12.8 (2017): 083002.
  • Mohallem, Soraya Vecci, et al. “Decreased fertility in mice exposed to environmental air pollution in the city of Sao Paulo.”  Environmental research  98.2 (2005): 196-202.
  • Bednaršek, N., et al. “Limacina helicina shell dissolution as an indicator of declining habitat suitability owing to ocean acidification in the California Current Ecosystem.”  Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281.1785 (2014): 20140123.
  • De Lange, Hendrika J., and Paul L. Van Reeuwijk. “Negative effects of UVB‐irradiated phytoplankton on life history traits and fitness of Daphnia magna.”  Freshwater Biology  48.4 (2003): 678-686.
  • Fuentes, Jose D., et al. “Air pollutants degrade floral scents and increase insect foraging times.”  Atmospheric Environment 141 (2016): 361-374.
  • Campbell, Stuart A., and Dena M. Vallano. “Plant defences mediate interactions between herbivory and the direct foliar uptake of atmospheric reactive nitrogen.”  Nature communications  9.1 (2018): 4743.

Rob Wreglesworth

Rob is the head writer at Innovate Eco sharing knowledge and passion cultivated over 10 years working in the Environmental Sector. He is on a mission to build a community of people that are passionate about solving environmental problems.

Recent Posts

Episode 32 - Bees As Biosensors - Can We Use Bees and Beekeepers To Monitor Biodiversity At Scale? - Max Rünzel, Hivetracks

In this episode, I speak to Max Runzel the cofounder and CEO of the company HiveTracks. HiveTracks creates technology to help beekeepers manage their hives. Started back in 2010 at the intersection...

Episode 31 - The New Social Network For Changemakers, Why Individual Actions Do Matter, Applying The Sales Funnel Concept To Climate And More! - Carlos Terol, Good Ripple

In this episode, I chat to ⁠Carlos Terol⁠. Carlos is a serial ecopreneur and around a year ago launched his latest venture ⁠Good Ripple⁠ which is a community platform for connecting...

Encyclopedia Britannica

  • Games & Quizzes
  • History & Society
  • Science & Tech
  • Biographies
  • Animals & Nature
  • Geography & Travel
  • Arts & Culture
  • On This Day
  • One Good Fact
  • New Articles
  • Lifestyles & Social Issues
  • Philosophy & Religion
  • Politics, Law & Government
  • World History
  • Health & Medicine
  • Browse Biographies
  • Birds, Reptiles & Other Vertebrates
  • Bugs, Mollusks & Other Invertebrates
  • Environment
  • Fossils & Geologic Time
  • Entertainment & Pop Culture
  • Sports & Recreation
  • Visual Arts
  • Demystified
  • Image Galleries
  • Infographics
  • Top Questions
  • Britannica Kids
  • Saving Earth
  • Space Next 50
  • Student Center
  • Introduction
  • Fine particulates
  • Carbon monoxide
  • Sulfur dioxide
  • Nitrogen dioxide
  • Greenhouse gases
  • Air pollution and air movement
  • The global reach of air pollution
  • Indoor air pollution

air pollution in Mexico City

air pollution

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

  • United States Environment Protection Agency - Air Pollution: Current and Future Challenges
  • Natural Resources Defense Council - Air Pollution: Everything You Need to Know
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences - Air Pollution
  • National Center for Biotechnology Information - PubMed Central - Air pollution: Impact and prevention
  • Environmental Pollution Centers - What is Air Pollution?
  • air pollution - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)
  • Table Of Contents

air pollution in Mexico City

Recent News

Trusted Britannica articles, summarized using artificial intelligence, to provide a quicker and simpler reading experience. This is a beta feature. Please verify important information in our full article.

This summary was created from our Britannica article using AI. Please verify important information in our full article.

effects of air pollution on animals essay

air pollution , release into the atmosphere of various gases , finely divided solids, or finely dispersed liquid aerosols at rates that exceed the natural capacity of the environment to dissipate and dilute or absorb them. These substances may reach concentrations in the air that cause undesirable health, economic, or aesthetic effects.

Major air pollutants

Criteria pollutants.

Clean, dry air consists primarily of nitrogen and oxygen —78 percent and 21 percent respectively, by volume. The remaining 1 percent is a mixture of other gases, mostly argon (0.9 percent), along with trace (very small) amounts of carbon dioxide , methane , hydrogen , helium , and more. Water vapour is also a normal, though quite variable, component of the atmosphere, normally ranging from 0.01 to 4 percent by volume; under very humid conditions the moisture content of air may be as high as 5 percent.

There are six major air pollutants that have been designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as “criteria” pollutants — criteria meaning that the concentrations of these pollutants in the atmosphere are useful as indicators of overall air quality. The sources, acceptable concentrations, and effects of the criteria pollutants are summarized in the table.

Criteria air pollutants
pollutant common sources maximum acceptable concentration in the atmosphere environmental risks human health risks
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
carbon monoxide (CO) automobile emissions, fires, industrial processes 35 ppm (1-hour period); 9 ppm (8-hour period) contributes to smog formation exacerbates symptoms of heart disease, such as chest pain; may cause vision problems and reduce physical and mental capabilities in healthy people
nitrogen oxides (NO and NO ) automobile emissions, electricity generation, industrial processes 0.053 ppm (1-year period) damage to foliage; contributes to smog formation inflammation and irritation of breathing passages
sulfur dioxide (SO ) electricity generation, fossil-fuel combustion, industrial processes, automobile emissions 0.03 ppm (1-year period); 0.14 ppm (24-hour period) major cause of haze; contributes to acid rain formation, which subsequently damages foliage, buildings, and monuments; reacts to form particulate matter breathing difficulties, particularly for people with asthma and heart disease
ozone (O ) nitrogen oxides (NO ) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from industrial and automobile emissions, gasoline vapours, chemical solvents, and electrical utilities 0.075 ppm (8-hour period) interferes with the ability of certain plants to respire, leading to increased susceptibility to other environmental stressors (e.g., disease, harsh weather) reduced lung function; irritation and inflammation of breathing passages
particulate matter sources of primary particles include fires, smokestacks, construction sites, and unpaved roads; sources of secondary particles include reactions between gaseous chemicals emitted by power plants and automobiles 150 μg/m (24-hour period for particles <10 μm); 35 μg/m (24-hour period for particles <2.5 μm) contributes to formation of haze as well as acid rain, which changes the pH balance of waterways and damages foliage, buildings, and monuments irritation of breathing passages, aggravation of asthma, irregular heartbeat
lead (Pb) metal processing, waste incineration, fossil-fuel combustion 0.15 μg/m (rolling three-month average); 1.5 μg/m (quarterly average) loss of biodiversity, decreased reproduction, neurological problems in vertebrates adverse effects upon multiple bodily systems; may contribute to learning disabilities when young children are exposed; cardiovascular effects in adults

The gaseous criteria air pollutants of primary concern in urban settings include sulfur dioxide , nitrogen dioxide , and carbon monoxide ; these are emitted directly into the air from fossil fuels such as fuel oil , gasoline , and natural gas that are burned in power plants, automobiles, and other combustion sources. Ozone (a key component of smog ) is also a gaseous pollutant; it forms in the atmosphere via complex chemical reactions occurring between nitrogen dioxide and various volatile organic compounds (e.g., gasoline vapours).

How is air quality measured?

Airborne suspensions of extremely small solid or liquid particles called “particulates” (e.g., soot, dust, smokes, fumes, mists), especially those less than 10 micrometres (μm; millionths of a metre) in size, are significant air pollutants because of their very harmful effects on human health. They are emitted by various industrial processes, coal- or oil-burning power plants, residential heating systems, and automobiles. Lead fumes (airborne particulates less than 0.5 μm in size) are particularly toxic and are an important pollutant of many diesel fuels .

Except for lead, criteria pollutants are emitted in industrialized countries at very high rates, typically measured in millions of tons per year. All except ozone are discharged directly into the atmosphere from a wide variety of sources. They are regulated primarily by establishing ambient air quality standards, which are maximum acceptable concentrations of each criteria pollutant in the atmosphere, regardless of its origin. The six criteria pollutants are described in turn below.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

Effects of air pollution on animal health

Profile image of Parvaiz Ahmad Rather

Related Papers

Parvaiz Ahmad Rather

effects of air pollution on animals essay

vijayant panday

Air pollution is a serious problem all over the world which causes terrific loss to human health and other living being. Sulphur Dioxide(SO2),Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2),Particulate Matter (PM2.5, PM10), Ozone(O3), Lead (Pb), Carbon Monoxide(CO), Benzene(C6H6) and Nickel(Ni) are some of the parameters which have significant impact on environmental pollution. Purpose of this paper is to review the literature relating to the monitoring of ambient air pollution in India and compare the same with Indian National Ambient Air Quality Standards-2009 (Indian NAAQS-2009).

IJESRT Journal

Air pollution is a serious problem all over the world which causes terrific loss to human health and other living being. Sulphur Dioxide(SO2),Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2),Particulate Matter (PM2.5, PM10), Ozone(O3), Lead (Pb), Carbon Monoxide(CO), Benzene(C6H6) and Nickel(Ni) are some of the parameters which have significant impact on environmental pollution. Purpose of this paper is to review the literature relating to the monitoring of ambient air pollution in India and compare the same with Indian National Ambient Air Quality Standards-2009 (Indian NAAQS-2009)

Deepak Tanwar

The performance of jatropha oil blended with diesel in a direct injection single-cylinder diesel engine with varying injection pressure was analyzed. Diesel and jatropha oil were characterized for its physico-chemical properties. It was found that viscosity of blend up to 20% jatropha oil and 80% diesel was close to diesel and with in ASTM limits for diesel fuels. Hence, 20% jatropha blend with diesel was selected for further work. The performance and emission tests were conducted with diesel and with 20% jatropha-diesel blend (J20) at various fuel injection pressures in order to evaluate optimum injection pressure with diesel and J20 blend for specific test-engine, which was found to be 205 bar and 225 bar respectively. Comparison of performance and emission characteristics with diesel and J20 blend at respective optimum injection pressures was done. It was found that at optimum pressure, the performance of J20 blend was enhanced and it was observed similar as that of diesel.

IJESRT JOURNAL

This study reports the analysis of the ambient air quality at six different locations in Guwahati city. It investigates the concentration of the pollutants-Suspended Particulate Matter (SPM), Respirable Suspended Particulate Matter (RSPM), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) and Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) for the months of April, May and June 2014. Six sampling sites (Industrial, Residential and Urban) were selected on the basis of different parameters like population density, meterological data etc. The sites selected were Bamunimaidam, Khanapara, Boragaon, Jalukbari, Santipur and Ulubari. The Air Quality Index (AQI) was calculated using Indian Air Quality Index (IND-AQI) procedure. It revealed that SPM and RSPM are mainly responsible for polluting the environment at different locations in Guwahati city. The concentration of gaseous pollutants namely SO2 and NO2 were under the permissible limits as per National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) while the concentration of particulate pollutants (SPM and RSPM/PM10) were higher than the permissible limits as per CPCB.

Dr.Shashidhar thhatikkonda

In the present study, an effort has been made to study the air quality at Warangal city. The air quality was measured in the places such as Teachers Colony, Kazipet Over Bridge, NIT Warangal, Hanamkonda Chowrastha, Warangal Chowrastha and Ram Adlabs of Warangal city in terms of the concentrations of Respirable Suspended Particulate Matter, Sulphur dioxide and Nitrogen oxides. Out of the 7 stations monitored, except at Teachers Colony all the others recorded values of RSPM which are above the permissible limits which is a great concern and hence quality of air in the city need to be addressed. The rapid increase in the number of vehicles along with other increasing human activities and their effect on the levels of RSPM are also analysed. The above mentioned stations were set up covering the entire Warangal city and grey areas were marked which exceed the standard levels as prescribed by the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board. The results of the study show that the above mentioned locations in the city are polluted and need attention by the pollution control board. Various methods which could reduce the concentrations of RSPM are also suggested.The concentrations of RSPM obtained were in the range of 200 μg/m3 to 300 μg/m3 at the Hanamkonda Chowrastha, which is twice as high as the permissible limits.. The other stations also recorded values in the same ranges as mentioned above. The Teachers Colony which comes under the residential zone recorded values in the range of 50 μg/m3 to 100 μg/m3 , which also is high compared to the standards for residential zones. With all the above facts Warangal city needs ambient air quality management to reduce the air pollution levels.

Vikrant Yadav

Air Quality - Monitoring and Modeling

Akhilendra Bhushan Gupta , Kaushik Shandilya , kaushik shandilya

BHAT MOHD SKINDER

This is the first type of study that has been undertaken where mushrooming of brick kilns (more than 15 brick kilns just in 2 km diameter) is deteriorating the air quality. Although industrialization is very important for the development of a country, this is a bitter fact that it speeds up the process of environmental degradation as was observed at the Panzan village of district Budgam in Jammu and Kashmir state (India). The monitoring of brick kiln emissions was carried out on 8 hourly basis to estimate the pollution level of gaseous pollutants like oxides of sulphur (SOx ), oxides of nitrogen (NOx ), particulate pollutants (Respirable particulate matter-RSPM) and (Non-Respirable Suspended particulate matterNRSPM) during the non-operational and operational phases of brick kilns in the months from April to September 2012. The results revealed that all the pollutants SOx , NOx , RSPM, NRSPM and SPM (sum of RSPM and NRSPM) were crossing the limits prescribed by National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) during the operational phase of brick kilns. Further, the air quality index (AQI) was calculated and the study sites were categorized from severe to high pollution including residential areas which is of most concern in respect to health conditions of the local people. Inter correlations of SOx , NOx , RSPM, NRSPM and SPM showing very strong correlations (p < 0.01) with each other indicated that their sources are the same i.e. brick kilns. To minimize the emission level of air pollutants from brick kilns, possible air pollution mitigation measures are suggested.

TIJ's Research Journal of Social Science & Management - RJSSM

RAJSHEKAR HIREMATH

The present study aims to evaluate the Ambient Air Quality status at ten prominent locations in Bangalore city for the year 2012 and 2013. This paper highlights the possible causes of worsening air quality. The selected sampling sites represent three different anthropogenic activities consisting of sensitive, residential, commercial and industrial area. The selected parameters, to judge the quality of air, were Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen Dioxide (NOx) Respirable Suspended Particulate Matter (RSPM) which gives a fair idea of the pollution load carried by the air. The data is interpreted in the form of general patterns, average values and seasonal variations. The annual average concentration of RSPM was well above the prescribed standards at all the selected sites, however concentration of SO2 was much below the national standards, but NOx was although below the permissible limits showed an increasing trend. Exceedence Factors calculated show that all areas are severely polluted ...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Kaizar Hossain

Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution

Dr. P.D. Raut

Shobhan Majumder

Nargis Shopna

Avnish Chauhan

Voice of Environment Newsletter

Moharana Choudhury

Iranian Journal of Ichthyology

Lotanna M Nneji

IRJET Journal

NILESH NANDANWAR

YMER Digital

Nitin Ingole

Journal of industrial pollution control

RAHUL BOADH

Journal of Environmental Research And Development (JEARD)

Prof (Dr) Punit Saraswat

Sagarmoy Phukan

Kurian Joseph

https://www.ijrrjournal.com/IJRR_Vol.6_Issue.12_Dec2019/Abstract_IJRR0046.html

International Journal of Research & Review (IJRR)

International Journal of Research in Advent Technology

ANUBHAV KUMAR

Shahul Hameed

Hemangi Desai

Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences

Prashant Mehta

Lognaga Siratutoga

https://www.ijhsr.org/IJHSR_Vol.8_Issue.1_Jan2018/IJHSR_Abstract.037.html

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research (IJHSR)

Biswajit Mukherjee

Journal of Environmental and Public Health

shalini shekhawat

DR Raaz K Maheshwari

J. Chem. & Cheml. Sci. Vol.1 (3), 186-208 (2011)

ATUL PRATAP SINGH

European Chemical Bulletin

hema krishna ravuri

International journal of engineering research and technology

Nagraj Patil

Murali Krishna Gurram

Industrial Health

Sopan Ingle

Vehicular traffic pollution

Current Science

prashant baredar

Urban Pollution: Science and Management

Manoj Shrivastava

Siddhant Gupta

Arif Hossen

Aerosol and Air Quality Research

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024
  • Content Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Upload Your Knowledge on Environmental Pollution:

Effects of air pollution: on human health, animals and atmosphere.

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Effects of Air Pollution: on Human Health, Animals and Atmosphere!

Air pollution has now become a worldwide phenomenon and every individual in one way or the other is facing problems caused by it. Its impact can be seen locally, at regional level as well as at global level.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

At local and regional levels its manifestations are in the form of alterations in (i) visibility, (ii) intensity of sunshine, (iii) precipitation amount, and (iv) acid rain. Its global effects are. (i) Change in natural climate by rise of temperature, melting of snow, (ii) increase in carbon dioxide, (iii) increase in particulates, (iv) holes in ozone layer, etc. Several aspects of air pollution, such as effects on the ozone layer, greenhouse effect, smog and acid rain have already been discussed.

The effects of air pollution can be grouped under the following heads:

(i) Effects on human health,

(ii) Effects on animals and plants,

(iii) Effects on atmosphere, and

(iv) Other effects.

1. Effects on Human Health:

Some environmental poisons can cause acute illness and even death. Others may be harmful, but the disease may take years or even decades to appear. Air pollution mainly affects the respiratory system.

Bronchitis, emphysema, asthma and lung cancer are some of the chronic diseases caused due to exposure to polluted air. It is feared that lung cancer is caused mainly due to polluted air because carcinogens are found in it. Its mortality rate is higher in urban areas.

Figure 7.1 shows the various effects of air pollution on the human body. Sulfur dioxide is the most serious and widespread air pollutant. Its lower concentration is a cause of spasms in the smooth muscle of bronchioles and its higher concentration induces increased mucus production.

Sulfur dioxide is also considered to cause cough, shortness of breath, spasm of the larynx and acute irritation to the membranes of the eyes. It also acts as an allergenic agent. When it reacts with some compounds, sulfuric acid is formed which may damage lungs.

Carbon monoxide often affects the oxygen carrying capacity of blood. Nitric oxide is reported to be a pulmonary irritant and its excess concentration may cause pulmonary haemorrhage.

Hydrogen sulfide is also toxic. Lead emitted from automobile exhausts is a cumulative poison and is dangerous particularly to children and may cause brain damage.

The particulate pollutants such as asbestos, silica, carbon, beryllium, lead, etc., are capable of exerting a noxious (fibrotic) local action in the interstitial areas of the lungs. Radioactive elements are also harmful to man and other living organisms. As described earlier, smog has a killer effect, which is also the result of air pollution. The death toll by smog varies from few persons to thousands.

In December 1952, about 4,000 persons died in London due to smog. Similar cases have been reported from London itself in 1956, 1957 and 1962 in which the death toll was between 700 and 1,000 persons. In other countries also smog deaths have been reported. In fact, the growing air pollution has now become a health hazard for man.

2. Effects on Animals and Plants:

The impact of air pollution on animals is more or less similar to that on man. Chronic poisoning results from the ingestion of forage contaminated with atmospheric pollutants. Among the metallic contaminants, arsenic, lead and molybdenum are important. Fluoride is another pollutant, which causes fluorosis among animals.

A number of livestock have been poisoned by fluorides and arsenic in North America. Bone lesions in animals due to excessive fluorides have also been reported.

Air pollution has caused widespread damage to trees, fruits, vegetables, flowers and in general, vegetation as a whole. The total annual cost of plant damage caused by air pollution in USA alone has been estimated to be in the range of 1 to 2 billion dollars. The most dramatic early instances of plant damage were seen in the total destruction of vegetation by sulfur dioxide in the areas surrounding smelters.

When the absorption of sulfur dioxide exceeds a particular level, the cells become inactive and are killed, resulting in tissue collapse and drying of leaves. Cotton, wheat, barley and apple are more sensitive to this pollutant.

Fluorides are responsible for various types of injuries to plants. The leaves of apple, apricot, fig, peach and prune are more suscep­tible to air borne fluorides. Fluorides seem to interfere with the photosynthesis and respiration of plants. Smog also causes injury to plants. Similar impact of ozone can be seen in the lesions to plants. Chlorine, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, etc., are also harmful to vegetation.

3. Effects on Atmosphere:

Some of the effects of air pollution on atmospheric conditions, such as effect on ozone layer, greenhouse effect, etc., have already been discussed. There is an increase in the carbon dioxide concentration in the air due to increased combustion of fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide absorbs heat strongly and the radiative cooling effect of the earth is thus decreased.

The rising of temperatures and ozone holes are some of the problems which have attracted the attention of the scientists all over the world. These problems are not related to any region or a country but are the global problems and their impact on world climate may be hazardous to the whole world.

The local weather conditions are highly susceptible to air pollution. Its impact on temperature, humidity, rainfall and clouds is apparent. The ‘smog dom’ on large urban centres is the result of air pollution. Due to air pollution, visibility also reduces.

4. Other Effects:

Air pollution can also cause damage to property and materials. The smoke, grit, dust and oxides of sulphur have harmful effects on structures.

In 1972, when an oil refinery at Mathura was opened, its impact on Taj Mahal became a major issue. Sulfur dioxide is the most damaging of gaseous pollutants. Aluminum alloys, copper and copper alloys, iron and steel are corroded when exposed to contam­inated air.

Hydrogen sulfide reacts with lead paints to form lead sulfide thereby producing a brown to black discolouration. The damage caused by air pollution to structures is not serious but from an aesthetic point of view, it is not desirable.

Related Articles:

  • Toxic Effects of Heavy Metals on Human Health and Plants | Industries
  • 5 Major Effects of Air Pollution on our Environment

Upload and Share Your Article:

  • Description *
  • Author Name *
  • Author Email Id. (required) *
  • File Drop files here or Select files Max. file size: 128 MB, Max. files: 5.
  • Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Air Pollution

Privacy Overview

CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Impact of air pollution on plants and animals

We have seen different aspects of air pollution in this website. In this article, we will go in-depth into the detailed study of how plants and animals are affected due to air pollution . How pollution becomes a killer was one of our topics, in which we saw how dangerous it is on humans. Here we will swiftly go through the causes of air pollution naturally and man-made, shall discuss about the major pollutants and then walk in to the impact on animals and also plants.

In the article of air pollution- a silent killer; we discussed about an aspect on pollutants entering indirectly our body through plants and animals. Hence it is very clear that air pollution is not only affecting humans, but also plants and animals. Air pollution means the contamination of the pure air that encumbers the normal consumption of air by the living beings and affect their welfare and comfort.

Essay on Impact of air pollution on plants and animals

Table of Contents

What are the natural causes of air pollution?

Air pollution is being done naturally also. In spite of being it a surprising fact, it is a big bold truth. The society has an outlook that air pollution is only man-made which is not true. Let’s see what are the natural causes of air pollution.

  • Volcanic eruption : it is one of the important natural air polluting factors. It releases tremendous volume of ashes, sulfur and chlorine to the atmosphere. It spreads very widely by wind and get dispersed over a large area.
  • Wild fire : wildfires occur naturally due to the excess sunlight in dry wooden area. This can happen when there is lack of precipitation. The wildfires have ended up killing many animals. Moreover, it releases smoke and carbon monoxide to the atmosphere heavily.
  • Wind : isn’t it shocking that wind is a natural air pollution factor? Unfortunately, being it a source of energy , it is also an air pollution factor. Wind carries away all kind of pollutants with them and spread it very widely. How ever it also creates a lot of dust in dry dusty areas.
  • Natural calamities : when talking about natural calamities, we need to keep in mind that volcanic eruption and wild fires themselves are natural calamities. The other calamities like flood, earth quake etc adds to the air pollution as it spreads out the waste widely.
  • Radioactive decaying : it is too common that there is presence of radioactive materials in the atmosphere or environment. These materials tend to release hazardous ionizing radiation when they start decaying. The emission of gamma, beta and alpha rays in the environment cause pollution to a very great extent.
  • Microbial decaying : decaying is a natural process that happens with the help of micro-organisms present in the environment. This decaying is very essential for the natural life-cycle to occur. Landfills are one of the examples for this. The decaying releases gases like methane to the environment causing air pollution.
  • Increase in temperature : the natural phenomenon of increase in temperature enables the increase in vaporizing the contaminated water to the air that naturally contaminates the air.

These are the natural causes of air pollution .

What are the man-made causes of air pollution?

  • Burning of fossil fuels : Man burns the fossil fuels for transportation and electricity on a large scale. It not only cause pollution but also its depletion of fossil fuels. Fossil fuels burning releases a large amount of carbon monoxide to the environment.
  • Landfills : waste disposition has become a great headache for all authorities across the World. The huge waste dumps on the isolated land start decaying with the help of the micro-organisms and produce hectic amount of methane to the atmosphere there by polluting the air.
  • Agriculture : agriculture done by man is a main source of pollution. The pesticides and fertilizers used for enhancing the growth of crops are one of the biggest air pollutants in the world. The smell of these pesticides and fertilizers spread through air by polluting it.
  • Industrial emission : the industries emit such a lot of pollutants like sulphur oxide, carbon monoxide, particulate matter 2.5 and 10. We will be discussing how these pollutants are affecting us in the next section. The industrial areas are the most polluted areas than what we see.
  • Transportation : the number of vehicles on road is directly proportional to the air pollution. We have witnessed the fact that the sale of vehicles is on the rise and obviously they are on the road. The burning of gasoline of the vehicle releases harmful gases to the atmosphere and that is the reason why the pollution is more on to the urban side.
  • Indoor air pollution : use of toxic cleaning components, scarce ventilation, irregular humidity and temperature causes indoor air pollution which affect the air. Using wood as stove and heaters inappropriately also affects the air inside and disturbs health of a person within no time.

What are the main pollutants in air and how it affects

There are enormous pollutants found in air, but we are discussing about the main and dangerous pollutants found in air. (Please see “Main pollutants in ‘Air pollution: The silent Killer'”) Even though we are discussing about effects of pollutants on plants and animals, we will just put across the health issues caused to humans. This is for a comparative study to know how worse it can be on plants and animals if it so bad on human.

  • Carbon monoxide : inhaling air with carbon monoxide reduces the ability of heart to pump and thus oxygen supply to the body reduces.
  • Ground level ozone : inhaling the ground level ozone activates congestion, chest pain, throat itching, cough etc and it is more than enough to accelerate bronchitis, asthma etc. it also affects functioning of the lungs and permanently leave marks on tissues.
  • Sulphur dioxide : this may cause irritation to nose, throat and eyes. It also develops dry cough, choking, flu and burning eyes etc.
  • Particle pollution : when these particles enter our body, it damages our heart health causing heart attacks, cardiac arrhythmias. It also triggers asthma attacks and other lung diseases. The capacity of lungs is also affected.
  • Nitrogen dioxide : nitrogen dioxide when entered inside may cause genetic mutations resulting in genetic diseases in children. It also affects the oxygen carrying capacity of blood followed by fatigue, dizziness, headache etc. It may also bring blueish color to the skin and lips.

Effect of air pollution on plants

Plants are the foremost ones that get exposed to air pollution, which is very apparent. The leaves absorb the pollutants in the atmosphere very quickly, resulting in releasing of reactive oxygen species along with free radicals. This can damage the whole of the plant at any point of time.

The Ozone also enters the plant and cause damage. It can hinder the growth of the plants and completely decay the plant at once. It affects the respiratory aid, stomata and there by affecting growth of the plant leading to its death. Acid rain, exposure to particulate pollution, sulphur oxide and nitrogen oxides restricts the nutrients and mineral absorption of plants. When coming to the agriculture side, it will end up in reduced yield. Thus, in a way pollution affects the economical growth of the country.

The main direct effects of pollution on plants are:

  • It affects the absorption of nutrients and minerals
  • Chlorophyll ruining
  • The health of the plant as a whole due to insufficient minerals.

Acid rain is said to be damage the nutrients in the soil, impairs the roots and stems of the plant arresting its growth and hence death of it. Acid rain affects the Ph level which cannot be tolerated by certain plants and chances are high that they extinct forever from Earth. The percentage of plant species extinction is really frightening. Around 40% of the plant species have extinct due to pollution according to the global surveys conducted. Ozone holes have a commendable role in the extinction of many plants.

Effects of air pollution on animals

We saw the effects of air pollution on plants and now let us see the effects of it on animals. The impact may not be evident when we see them but it can be easily made out with the fact study. We have seen the health issues caused to humans when exposed to air pollution. The animals also have the respiratory system and the tolerance level is different from each species.

The exposure to the air pollutants or the pollutants entering the body of animals can consequently change the behaviour of the animals. They can act weird than usual when they are affected by the pollutants. The particulate pollution, nitrogen oxide etc have proved that they change the public behavior as well as the breeding activities of animals.

The exposure to pollutants has increased the diseases in animals. The habitual exposure has paved way to the death of the whole species and there by making them extinct. A species being extinct directly affects the ecosystem and food chain system of the nature. The air pollution has affected the reproductive ability, endocrine functioning, immune system, interna organ health etc.

Thus, summing up the effects of air pollution on animals:

  • The health of the animals as a whole, its reproduction and weakness to diseases are the highlighted ones.
  • Death of the animals at a higher rate due to diseases or illness.
  • Threat of the extinction of the species which directly affects the ecosystem of nature
  • The food chain system being affected as a whole as one species being extinct naturally ends in the increase in the species, which was a food for the extinct species.

Birds are the most affected category among animals due to air pollution. Since they have the most efficient respiratory system than any other animal species. This is one of the reasons and the other one is they are the ones those get exposed to air pollution to the most because they fly all over the cities, industrial areas, landfills etc. unlike all other animals they don’t remain at a short area.

Disturbance to the bird community by air pollution is hefty. Inhaling of O3 and nitrogen oxides damages the lungs of the birds directly. It also affects the reproductive system resulting in the decline of its total number. Damage to the immune system, lung failure etc are the other consequences of air pollution on birds.

Conclusion Air pollution is a monster which is powerful enough to pause the life on Earth. Animals and human depend on plants to live. Plants are considered to be the air purifier. But what happens when the plants themselves cannot survive due to air pollution. Human depend on animals too for their food. And what if they too become extinct. These are the questions raised to ourselves as well because man-made pollution is the major contributor to the air pollution rather than the natural causes. We have the obligation to cut down the proportion of pollution made to the environment. Else it is very apparent that the plants get extinct or its growth retards by the end of this century.

Related posts:

  • How smoking contributes to Air Pollution and affect the environment and our health
  • How recycling prevents pollution
  • What is Land pollution? Its causes and effects
  • What is light pollution, its causes, types and prevention
  • Air Pollution: A silent killer of life?
  • Most Dangerous Man Made Pollution That Can Be Controlled
  • Measures to control Air Pollution – Effective solutions to prevent it
  • What is Wind Farm and its different types ?

Latest Articles

Environmental.

DMCA.com Protection Status

  • Environment

Pollution's Effects on Animals Essay Sample

📌Category: , ,
📌Words: 656
📌Pages: 3
📌Published: 20 September 2021

Animals die every day because of pollution. Do you pollute? Do you want animals to die? John Therry Catholic College has rubbish everywhere and has nowhere near as many bins that there should be. Things need to change. There needs to be more bins around the school. There are many animals around the school such as birds, cats and reptiles that have easy access to the rubbish which could possibly kill them. Not only is it about animals but the air that students breathe in can be polluted and the school just looks dirty and unclean with rubbish everywhere which can give the school a bad reputation which is terrible considering John Therry is such a beautiful place. It is important as a Catholic school to keep our environment clean because that is what God/Jesus wanted us to do when he told Adam and Eve to look after his land. As a school community it is important to keep our environment clean which is why we should have more bins around the school and people at lunch picking up rubbish that doesn't end up in the bin. It's disgusting the amount of garbage left around John Therry which is affecting both humans and animals. It is really not that hard to pick up rubbish and put it in the bin. Plastic usage is a big challenge that needs to be overcome.

Plastic kills animals on land and in water. Plastic usage is a terrible problem that needs to stop or at least be reduced. It is slowly building up in the Ocean as well as on land which is horrible for both animals and humans. Data shows that around 100,000 mammals die every year because of plastic and 4.2 million people die a year because of air pollution. There are different types of pollution such as air pollution, water pollution, and land pollution. All of these different types of pollution can be caused because of plastic. Air pollution causes a mountain of problems such as making hole appear in the ozone layer which causes climate change and can give people sicknesses from the air they breathe in. Water pollution kills animals because they think plastic is food, water pollution can also cause sicknesses because the water is dirty. Land pollution can cause lack of crop growth because of the bad soil and chemical air, and again causes animals to die and people get sick. There are many different graphs, tables and evidence about plastic usage.

Would you reduce your plastic usage to save the environment? Would you reduce your plastic usage to save animals? Would you reduce your plastic usage to save future generations of humans? Plastic usage needs to be reduced. There are many ways you can stop using a large amount of plastic, for example you can avoid single use plastic straws, bring a reusable/cloth bag when you go shopping, buy more items in bulk to reduce the amount of plastic packaging, reduce plastic containers, use a reusable drink bottle/coffee cup, don't use plastic cutlery if possible and use refillable bottles and packaging. John Therry will benefit from reducing plastic waste because it will be better for the environment, animals and humans health and better for the school's reputation and cleanliness. My examples of ways to reduce plastic waste fit in with our Catholic school beliefs and identity because reducing waste will better the school's environment and help take care of the environment more which is what God/Jesus wanted and told us to do. All of these examples put together should be more than a good reason to better John Therry.

Therefore, it is evident that pollution at John Therry Catholic College has to reduce the amount of rubbish around the place. Reducing the amount of plastic at school and putting more bins around the school is an extremely good idea and a very good way to get students to follow in the Catholic footsteps and beliefs of our school. Everyone knows that pollution is a huge environmental issue that needs to be talked about and acted on more. That is why my ideas should be acted on or at least talked more about. If you had the choice to help the environment would you Mr. Marshall?

Related Samples

  • Essay on Water Issue in Kathmandu
  • Essay Sample on Climate Change
  • The Smartest Dog Breeds Essay Example
  • The El Reno Tornado Essay Example
  • The Future of Medical World: Animals Testing Essay Example
  • Essay About Giant Panda Keeper Nichole MacCorkle
  • Save the Oceans Essay Sample
  • How to Survive in Wildlife Essay Example
  • An Essay that Examines the Destructive Nature of Hurricanes
  • Animals Should Not Be Kept in Zoos Essay Example

Didn't find the perfect sample?

effects of air pollution on animals essay

You can order a custom paper by our expert writers

  • DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.323673
  • Corpus ID: 269385362

Understanding the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health Effects of Air Pollution in the Context of Cumulative Exposomic Impacts

  • Haitham Khraishah , Zhuo Chen , Sanjay Rajagopalan
  • Published in Circulation Research 26 April 2024
  • Environmental Science, Medicine

Figures from this paper

figure 1

One Citation

Environmental impacts on cardiovascular health and biology: an overview, 133 references, ambient air pollution and atherosclerosis: insights into dose, time, and mechanisms., air pollution and cardiovascular disease: jacc state-of-the-art review., air pollution exposure and cardiometabolic risk..

  • Highly Influential

Noise and Air Pollution as Risk Factors for Hypertension: Part II-Pathophysiologic Insight.

Noise and air pollution as risk factors for hypertension: part i-epidemiology., the indoor-outdoor air-pollution continuum and the burden of cardiovascular disease: an opportunity for improving global health., ambient air pollution and atherosclerosis: recent updates, cardiopulmonary impact of particulate air pollution in high-risk populations: jacc state-of-the-art review., air pollution and temperature: a systematic review of ubiquitous environmental exposures and sudden cardiac death, the global threat of outdoor ambient air pollution to cardiovascular health: time for intervention., related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

effects of air pollution on animals essay

Published in Circulation Research 2024

Haitham Khraishah Zhuo Chen Sanjay Rajagopalan

Deadly and growing impact of air pollution laid bare in new UNICEF-backed report

In Karachi, Pakistan, a woman burns trash to cook food causing air pollution.

Facebook Twitter Print Email

The State of Global Air (SoGA) report published in partnership with the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) warns on Wednesday that air pollution is increasingly impacting human health - and is now the second leading global risk factor for premature death.

The fifth edition of the report, released by the Health Effects Institute (HEI), revealed that air pollution caused 8.1 million deaths worldwide in 2021 and many millions are dealing with debilitating chronic diseases , leaving healthcare systems, economies, and societies.

Further, it found that children under five are particularly vulnerable to air pollution, leaving over 700,000 in this age group dead in 2021.

‘Accurate predictor’

The SoGA report found that pollutants like outdoor fine particulate matter (PM2.5) - which comes from burning fossil fuels and biomass in sectors like transportation, residential homes, wildfires, and more - caused more than 90 per cent of global air pollution deaths and were found to be the “most consistent and accurate predictor of poor health outcomes around the world .”

Other pollutants like household air pollution, ozone (O3), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) - which can be found in traffic exhaust - also contribute to the global deterioration of human health.

 HEI President Dr. Elena Craft said she hopes the information in the report will inspire change.

 “Air pollution has enormous implications for health. We know that improving air quality and global public health is practical and achievable ,” she said.

 In addition to affecting people’s health, pollutants like PM2.5 add to greenhouse gases that are warming the planet. As the earth warms, regions with high levels of NO2 will experience great levels of ozone, which can result in greater health effects.

 Dr. Pallavi Pant, HEI’s Head of Global Health said, “This new report offers a stark reminder of the significant impacts air pollution has on human health, with far too much of the burden borne by young children, older populations, and low- and middle-income countries .”

 She continued, “This points sharply at an opportunity for cities and countries to consider air quality and air pollution as high-risk factors when developing health policies and other noncommunicable disease prevention and control programmes.”

Children ‘uniquely vulnerable’

The report reveals that children are “uniquely vulnerable” to air pollution and effects can begin in the womb . It states that young children’s exposure to air pollution has resulted in one in five deaths globally, pneumonia and asthma and affects children with inequities more than it does those in high-income countries.

Air pollution, primarily from the burning of fossil fuels, is a serious problem in Indian cities.

UNICEF Deputy Executive Director Kitty van der Heijden said that nearly 2,000 children under five die every day due to the effects of air pollution .

‘The global urgency is undeniable ,” she said. “It is imperative governments and businesses consider these estimates and locally available data and use it to inform meaningful, child-focused action to reduce air pollution and protect children’s health.”

Progress made

In addition to sharing details on the negative effects of air pollution on human health, the SoGA report also claims that there has been better awareness about the harms of being exposed to household air pollution and a 53 per cent decrease in the death rate of children under five since 2000 due to increased access to clean energy for cooking.

Also, regions experiencing the highest levels of air pollution have begun to address the issue by installing air pollution monitoring networks, implementing stricter air quality policies and more - particularly in Africa, Latin America and Asia.

  • air pollution

Information

  • Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Active Journals
  • Find a Journal
  • Proceedings Series
  • For Authors
  • For Reviewers
  • For Editors
  • For Librarians
  • For Publishers
  • For Societies
  • For Conference Organizers
  • Open Access Policy
  • Institutional Open Access Program
  • Special Issues Guidelines
  • Editorial Process
  • Research and Publication Ethics
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Testimonials
  • Preprints.org
  • SciProfiles
  • Encyclopedia

sustainability-logo

Article Menu

effects of air pollution on animals essay

  • Subscribe SciFeed
  • Recommended Articles
  • Google Scholar
  • on Google Scholar
  • Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

How environmental regulation affects pollution reduction and carbon reduction synergies—an empirical analysis based on chinese provincial data.

effects of air pollution on animals essay

1. Introduction

2. theoretical mechanisms, 2.1. synergistic effects of environmental regulation on pollution and carbon reduction, 2.2. the mechanism of the synergistic effect of environmental regulation, 3. methods and data, 3.1. methods, 3.1.1. spatial autocorrelation test, 3.1.2. construction of a spatial metrology model, 3.1.3. construction of a mediating-effects model, 3.2. variable measures and data sources, 3.2.1. explained variables, 3.2.2. core explanatory variables, 3.2.3. other variables, 3.2.4. data sources, 4. empirical analysis, 4.1. an empirical test of the synergistic effect of environmental regulation on pollution reduction and carbon reduction, 4.1.1. spatial autocorrelation test, global spatial autocorrelation test, local spatial autocorrelation test, 4.1.2. model test, lagrange multiplier test (lm test), hausman test, 4.1.3. baseline results analysis, 4.1.4. robustness test, 4.2. mechanism analysis, 4.2.1. technological innovation mechanism test, 4.2.2. industrial structure upgrading mechanism test, 4.2.3. foreign direct investment mechanism test, 5. conclusions and policy implications, 5.1. conclusions, 5.2. policy recommendations, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest, nomenclature.

PRCRPollution reduction and carbon reduction
EREnvironmental regulation
TITechnical innovation
ISUIndustrial structure upgrading
FDIForeign direct investment
  • Deveci, M. Rough sets based Ordinal Priority Approach to evaluate sustainable development goals (SDGs) for sustainable mining. Resour. Policy 2022 , 79 , 103049. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhang, D.; Guo, Z.; Niu, X.; Gao, Y.; Wang, C.; Xu, H. Comprehensive evaluation on sustainable development based on planetary pressures and ecological well-being performance: A case study on the belt and road regions. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 376 , 134211. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Aydin, G. The Modeling of Coal-related CO 2 Emissions and Projections into Future Planning. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2014 , 36 , 191–201. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Bu, X. Collaborative management of pollution and carbon reduction enters a new journey. Environ. Econ. 2022 , 15 , 10–17. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Yang, H.; Yao, R.; Sun, P.; Ge, C.; Ma, Z.; Bian, Y.; Liu, R. Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Forces of PM2.5 in Urban Agglomerations in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023 , 20 , 2316. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Liu, C.; Sun, W.; Li, P.; Zhang, L.; Li, M. Differential characteristics of carbon emission efficiency and coordinated emission reduction pathways under different stages of economic development: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta, China. J. Environ. Manag. 2023 , 330 , 117018. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Zhang, L.; Wu, P.; Niu, M.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, J.; Dong, G.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, Z.; Du, M.; Jiang, H.; et al. A systematic assessment of city-level climate change mitigation and air quality improvement in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022 , 839 , 156274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Gu, B.; Zhao, H.; Luo, X.; Zhu, T.; Fan, J. Progress and Prospects of Bibliometric-based Research on Pollution Reduction and Carbon Synergistic Emission Reduction. J. Environ. Eng. Technol. 2023 , 13 , 85–95. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Smith, K.R.; Haigler, E. Co-benefits of climate mitigation and health protection in energy systems: Scoping methods. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2008 , 29 , 11–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Sharon, F.; Alan, D.D.; Tara, G.; Lock, K.; Chalabi, Z.; Roberts, I.; Haines, A. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Food and agriculture (Review). Lancet 2009 , 374 , 2016–2025. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Groosman, B.; Muller, N.Z.; O’Neill-Toy, E. The Ancillary Benefits from Climate Policy in the United States. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011 , 50 , 585–603. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shrestha, R.M.; Pradhan, S. Co-benefits of CO 2 emission reduction in a developing country. Energy Policy 2010 , 38 , 2586–2597. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Qian, H.; Xu, S.; Cao, J.; Ren, F.; Wei, W.; Meng, J.; Wu, L. Air pollution reduction and climate co-benefits in China’s industries. Nat. Sustain. 2021 , 4 , 417–425. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Dong, F.; Yu, B.L.; Pan, Y.L. Examining the synergistic effect of CO 2 emissions on PM2.5 emissions reduction: Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 223 , 759–771. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Jia, W.; Li, L.; Lei, Y.; Wu, S. Synergistic effect of CO 2 and PM2.5 emissions from coal consumption and the impacts on health effects. J. Environ. Manag. 2023 , 325 , 116535. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Chae, Y. Co-benefit analysis of an air quality management plan and greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the Seoul metropolitan area. Environ. Sci. Policy 2010 , 13 , 205–216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wu, P.; Guo, F.; Cai, B.; Wang, C.; Lv, C.; Liu, H.; Gao, J. Co-benefits of peaking carbon dioxide emissions on air quality and health, a case of Guangzhou, China. J. Environ. Manag. 2021 , 282 , 111796. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chen, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Yi, W.; Hong, J.; Zhang, B. Has China achieved synergistic reduction of carbon emissions and air pollution? Evidence from 283 Chinese cities. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2023 , 103 , 107277. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Li, Y.; Lin, F.; Wang, W. Environmental regulation and inward foreign direct investment: Evidence from the eleventh Five-Year Plan in China. J. Econ. Surv. 2022 , 36 , 684–707. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Leite, M.S.M. Characterization of raw swine waste and effluents treated anaerobically: Parameters for Brazilian environmental regulation construction aiming agricultural use. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2021 , 1 , 165–176. [ Google Scholar ]
  • St-Pierre, M.; Elrod, A.A. The perverse effect of environmental regulation on emissions: The role of product-mix changes. J. Public Econ. Theory 2021 , 24 , 1. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Graafland, J.; Bovenberg, L. Government regulation, business leaders’ motivations and environmental performance of SMEs. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2020 , 63 , 1335–1355. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Xie, Z.; Qu, L.; Lin, R.; Guo, Q. Relationships between fluctuations of environmental regulation, technological innovation, and economic growth: A multinational perspective. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2022 , 35 , 1267–1287. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Bao, Q.; Shao, M.; Yang, D. Environmental regulation, local legislation and pollution control in China. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2021 , 26 , 321–339. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Li, Y.; Zhang, L. Collaborative Governance and Environmental Regulation Measures for Pollution Reduction and Carbon Reduction in the Yangtze River Basin under the “Double Carbon” Goal. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 5094. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Xu, X.; Cui, Y.; Zhong, Y. Impact of environmental regulation and fdi on green total factor productivity: Evidence from China. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2021 , 20 , 177–183. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Liu, W. Mechanisms of Environmental Regulation’s Impact on Green Technological Progress—Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 1600. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Porter, M.E.; van der Linde, C. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995 , 9 , 97–118. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shadbegian, R.J.; Gray, W.B. Assessing multi-dimensional performance: Environmental and economic outcomes. J. Product. Anal. 2006 , 26 , 213–234. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Hu, J.; Wu, H.; Ying, S.X. Environmental regulation, market forces, and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from the implementation of cleaner production standards in China. J. Bus. Res. 2022 , 150 , 606–622. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Chen, X.; Chen, Z. Can China’s Environmental Regulations Effectively Reduce Pollution Emissions? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021 , 18 , 4658. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Hu, X.; Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Meng, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Tao, S. The impact of environmental protection tax on sectoral and spatial distribution of air pollution emissions in China—IOPscience. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019 , 14 , 054013. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Shen, L.; Fan, R.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, E. Invisible economy, performance assessment of local governments, and environmental regulation in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023 , 1–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Zhang, T.; Zho, J.-Y.; Hussain, R.Y.; Wang, M.; Ren, K. Research on the cultivation of green competitiveness among chinese heavily polluting enterprises under country/district environmental regulations. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022 , 10 , 955744. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Feng, Y.; Wang, X.; Du, W.; Wu, H.; Wang, J. Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 235 , 210–224. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wang, H.; Zhang, R. Effects of environmental regulation on CO 2 emissions: An empirical analysis of 282 cities in China. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022 , 29 , 259–272. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Bu, C.; Shi, D. The emission reduction effect of daily penalty policy on firms. J. Environ. Manag. 2021 , 294 , 112922. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Wang, Z.; Yu, L.; Zheng, M.; Xing, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, Z. One Fee, Two Reductions: The Double Abatement Effect of Pollutant Discharge Fees on Industrial Pollution and Carbon Emissions. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022 , 10 , 928434. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ai, H.; Tan, X.; Liu, W.; Zhou, S.; Zhou, Y.; Xing, H. The impact of environmental regulation on carbon emissions: Evidence from China. Econ. Anal. Policy 2023 , 80 , 1067–1079. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Gao, X.; Liu, N.; Hua, Y. Environmental Protection Tax Law on the synergy of pollution reduction and carbon reduction in China: Evidence from a panel data of 107 cities. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022 , 33 , 425–437. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Liu, C.; Yang, D.; Sun, J.; Cheng, Y. The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Pollution and Carbon Reduction in the Yellow River Basin, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023 , 20 , 1709. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Zhang, X.; Wu, N.; Wu, J.; Feng, Q.; Fu, Z. Review of the meaning, characterization and application of environmental regulation. J. Environ. Eng. Technol. 2021 , 11 , 1250–1257. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhang, M.; Liu, X.; Ding, Y.; Wang, W. How does environmental regulation affect haze pollution governance?—An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data. Sci. Total Environ. 2019 , 695 , 133905. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Lin, B.; Zhang, A. Can government environmental regulation promote low-carbon development in heavy polluting industries? Evidence from China’s new environmental protection law. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2023 , 99 , 106991. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Othman, N.; Yusop, Z.; Huay, C.S.; Azhar, N.A.Z.M. The Impact of The European Union’s Environmental Policy towards Competitiveness in Malaysia’s Palm Oil Industry. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022 , 1102 , 12033. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wu, J.; Wei, Y.D.; Li, Q.; Yuan, F. Economic transition and changing location of manufacturing industry in China: A study of the Yangtze River Delta. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 2624. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Ginebreda, A.; Sabater-Liesa, L.; Rico, A.; Focks, A.; Barceló, D. Reconciling monitoring and modeling: An appraisal of river monitoring networks based on a spatial autocorrelation approach—Emerging pollutants in the Danube River as a case study. Sci. Total Environ. 2018 , 618 , 323–335. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Mondini, A.; Chiaravalloti-Neto, F. Spatial correlation of incidence of dengue with socioeconomic, demographic and environmental variables in a Brazilian city. Sci. Total Environ. 2008 , 393 , 241–248. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Kuersteiner, G.M. Invariance principles for dependent processes indexed by Besov classes with an application to a Hausman test for linearity (Article). J. Econom. 2019 , 211 , 243–261. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Pace, R.K.; LeSage, J.P. A spatial Hausman test. Econ. Lett. 2008 , 101 , 282–284. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
  • Wen, Z.; Ye, B. Analyses of mediating effects: The development Analyses of mediating effects: The development of methods and models. Psychol. Sci. Res. 2014 , 22 , 731–745. [ Google Scholar ]
  • Zhuang, R.; Mi, K.; Zhi, M.; Zhang, C. Digital Finance and Green Development: Characteristics, Mechanisms, and Empirical Evidence. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022 , 19 , 16940. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Zhang, Q.; Tang, D.; Bethel, B.J. Impact of Urbanization on the Environmental Regulation Efficiency in the Yangtze River Basin Based on the Empirical Analysis of Spatial Econometrics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021 , 18 , 9105. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
  • Dong, C.; Yang, Y. Construction of the Evaluation Index System of China’s Green Economy Development Level-Based on the Dual Model of Entropy Value Method and Coefficient of Variation Method. Int. J. New Dev. Eng. Soc. 2022 , 6 , 38–44. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Energy TypeCoalCokeCrude OilGasolineKeroseneDiesel OilNatural GasFuel Oil
Discount coal coefficient (10 tce/10 t)0.7140.9711.4291.4711.4711.4571.3301.427
Carbon emission coefficient (10 t/10 tce)0.7560.8550.5860.5540.5710.5920.4480.619
Air PollutantEquivalent CoefficientEquivalent Coefficient Value
SO α1/0.95
NO β1/0.95
PM γ1/2.18
COδ1/16.7
Distribution IntervalDefinition
S ≤ 0There is no synergy between PRCR
S > 0PR and CR are synergistic
0 < S < 1The emission reduction effect of air pollutants is greater than that of CO
S = 1The reduction of CO and air pollutants is comparable
S > 1The effect of CO reduction in this region is greater than that of air pollutants
TypeIndex HierarchyComputeUnitRelation
ER1Environmental governance law enforcement intensityNumber and standards of new local environmental protection laws and regulations/+
Number of cases of administrative punishment accepted for environmental violations in a given year/-
Environmental protection investmentInvestment in industrial pollution controlCNY hundred million+
Urban environmental infrastructure investment/gross regional product%+
ER2Tax collectionEmission tax collection/gross regional product%-
Exhaust gas/wastewater discharge per unit of industrial added valueSulfur dioxide emissions per unit of industrial added valuet/CNY ten thousand-
Industrial wastewater discharge per unit of industrial added valuet/CNY ten thousand-
ER3Environmental petitionNumber of environmental petitions/-
Environmental practitionerNumber of employees of environmental systems organizations/year-end population%+
w1w2
ER1LM-Lag107.307 ***104.671 ***
RLM-Lag42.868 **41.591 ***
LM-Error67.470 ***62.530 ***
RLM-Error0.0870.410
ER2LM-Lag106.218 ***103.217 **
RLM-Lag47.275 ***33.8534 **
LM-Error62.748 ***61.736 ***
RLM-Error0.8530.255
ER3LM-Lag105.573 ***101.831 ***
RLM-Lag42.526 ***37.736 ***
LM-Error70.836 ***75.767 ***
RLM-Error0.0051.826
ER1ER2ER3
Hausman13.1612.8413.05
-value0.06380.07020.0727
VariablelnSI
lnER10.163 **
(2.00)
lnER2 0.074 **
(1.46)
lnER3 0.002 ***
(0.65)
lnPGDP0.348 ***0.377 ***0.344 ***
(10.12)(10.26)(9.88)
lnUR−0.402 ***−0.369 ***−0.372 ***
(−5.42)(−5.27)(−5.29)
lnOP−0.066 ***−0.071 ***−0.073 ***
(−3.27)(−3.36)(−3.39)
lnERS−1.224 ***−1.235 ***−1.248 ***
(−11.57)(−11.63)(−11.75)
0.323 ***0.332 ***0.320 ***
(8.52)(8.80)(8.27)
R-squared0.5130.4790.400
L-likelihood313.7924313.7529311.9303
VariablelnSI
lnER10.137 **
(1.62)
lnER2 0.053 **
(0.73)
lnER3 0.002 ***
(0.44)
lnPGDP0.218 ***0.264 ***0.209 ***
(9.72)(9.85)(9.52)
lnUR−0.422 ***−0.394 ***−0.330 ***
(−4.88)(−4.75)(−4.51)
lnOP−0.056 ***−0.051 ***−0.062 ***
(−2.57)(−2.33)(−3.62)
lnERS−1.451 ***−1.472 ***−1.447 ***
(−16.94)(−17.03)(−16.75)
0.272 ***0.293 ***0.293 ***
(11.85)(12.17)(12.17)
R-squared0.4920.4940.478
L-likehihood312.2295311.1449312.0357
The First StepThe Second StepThe Third Step
VARIABLESlnSIlnTIlnSI
lnER0.172 **0.024 **0.176 *
(2.00)(1.34)(2.37)
lnTI 0.049 **
(0.57)
The First StepThe Second StepThe Third Step
VARIABLESlnSIlnINDlnSI
lnER0.172 **0.015 ***0.121 *
(2.00)(0.34)(1.48)
lnIND 0.015
(0.18)
The First StepThe Second StepThe Third Step
VARIABLESlnSIlnFDIlnSI
lnER0.172 **−0.043 **0.144 **
(2.00)(−0.62)(1.57)
lnFDI −0.013 *
(−1.35)
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

Shi, W.; Wang, W.; Tang, W.; Qiao, F.; Zhang, G.; Pei, R.; Zhang, L. How Environmental Regulation Affects Pollution Reduction and Carbon Reduction Synergies—An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Provincial Data. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 5331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135331

Shi W, Wang W, Tang W, Qiao F, Zhang G, Pei R, Zhang L. How Environmental Regulation Affects Pollution Reduction and Carbon Reduction Synergies—An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Provincial Data. Sustainability . 2024; 16(13):5331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135331

Shi, Wei, Weijuan Wang, Wenwen Tang, Fuwei Qiao, Guowei Zhang, Runzhu Pei, and Luyao Zhang. 2024. "How Environmental Regulation Affects Pollution Reduction and Carbon Reduction Synergies—An Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Provincial Data" Sustainability 16, no. 13: 5331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135331

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

MDPI

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

COMMENTS

  1. Essay on Effects Of Pollution On Animals

    250 Words Essay on Effects Of Pollution On Animals Introduction. Pollution is harmful to everyone, including animals. It is caused by harmful substances released into the environment. This essay will explore how pollution affects animals. Air Pollution. Air pollution is very harmful to animals. It can cause breathing problems and diseases.

  2. Essay Effects of Air Pollution on Animals

    Symptoms such as tachycardia, increased blood pressure, and anemia due to an inhibitory effect on hematopoiesis have been observed as a consequence of heavy metal pollution. 3. Nervous system. There have always been arguments about the connection between exposure to air-suspended toxic materials and the nervous system.

  3. Effects of Air Pollution

    Check the current air quality in your area to determine if you should take precautions such as reducing or avoiding outdoor activity. Short-term exposure to air pollution can cause: Long-term exposure to air pollution can cause: Coughing. Wheezing/difficulty breathing. Irritation to eyes, nose, and throat. Headache. Dizziness.

  4. Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review

    Short-term and long-term adverse effects on human health are observed. VOCs are responsible for indoor air smells. Short-term exposure is found to cause irritation of eyes, nose, throat, and mucosal membranes, while those of long duration exposure include toxic reactions ( 92 ).

  5. Air Pollution: Causes and Effects: [Essay Example], 723 words

    Get original essay. Burning of fossil fuels like coal, petroleum and other factory combustibles is one major cause of air pollution, also vehicles like cars, trains and airplanes cause a big amount of air pollution. Carbon monoxide is a poisonous, odorless, colorless gas that is formed when burning fossil fuels such as coal, petroleum and ...

  6. Air Pollution: Causes, Effects, and Solutions

    The causes range from human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels, indoor burning of wood, biomass-based fuels to cook, heat, light, transportation emissions, increased industrial activities, and more. Some natural sources of air pollution contributions include volcanic activity, dust and wildfires, animals, and vegetation. To analyze ...

  7. Effect Of Air Pollution On Plants And Animals

    Effect of Air Pollution on Animals Respiratory Issues and Lung Damage. Drawing parallels to humans, animals too are victim to the respiratory onslaught posed by air pollutants. Chronic exposure can evoke myriad ailments, from bronchitis and asthma to irreversible lung damage.

  8. Effects Of Air Pollution On Animals

    This study, conducted in 1961, summarizes the knowledge at the time about the effects of air pollution on animals. This is one of the only major studies that addresses the issue of animals and air pollution. This articles summarizes the outcome of major air pollution disasters and provides a review of animal-based laboratory experiments.

  9. Impact of environmental pollution on animal health

    Addressing climate change and ecosystem degradation what can veterinarians contribute JAVMA Vol 260 2022 (1) ... Air pollution from wildfires and industrial emissions is a major risk factor for ...

  10. Air Pollution Effects on Terrestrial and Aquatic Animals

    Air pollution has adversely affected animals since the advent of the industrial revolution (Newman 1980). Currently, the greatest threat to animal biodiversity from air pollution occurs in industrial countries where regional impacts (e.g., acid precipitation, ozone) are causing widespread direct and indirect effects to animals and their habitats.

  11. EFFECT OF ENVIROMENTAL POLLUTION ON ANIMAL HEALTH

    Aniagolu Mmasi. 2024, Mmasi Aniagolu. Environmental pollution is a pressing global issue with profound implications for ecosystems, human health, and sustainable development. This report provides a comprehensive overview of environmental pollution, exploring its various forms, sources, and impacts on the environment and society.

  12. Air Pollution

    Air pollution consists of chemicals or particles in the air that can harm the health of humans, animals, and plants. It also damages buildings. Pollutants in the air take many forms. They can be gases, solid particles, or liquid droplets. Sources of Air Pollution Pollution enters the Earth's atmosphere in many different ways. Most air pollution is created by people, taking the form of ...

  13. Air pollution: effects on wild animals

    Air pollution: effects on wild animals. Animals, or wildlife, are vulnerable to harm from air pollution. Pollutant issues of concern include acid rain, heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and other toxic substances. Insects, worms, clams, fish, birds and mammals, all interact with their environment in different ways.

  14. What Are The Effects Of Air Pollution On Animals?

    Ingestion of particles in food or water. Absorption of gases through the skin. Indirect effects include: Climate change. Ocean acidification. Acid rain. Ozone layer depletion. As you can see there are plenty of potential effects of air pollution on animals. Some of these are quite well understood and some are not.

  15. Air pollution

    Air pollution, release into the atmosphere of various gases, finely divided solids, or finely dispersed liquid aerosols at rates that exceed the natural capacity of the environment to dissipate and dilute or absorb them. High concentrations can cause undesirable health, economic, or aesthetic effects.

  16. Cardiovascular effects of air pollution: current evidence from animal

    The initial search resulted in 130 papers on the short-term effects and ∼50 publications on the long-term effects of air pollution on the cardiovascular system. After application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and considering human and animal studies, a total of 78 studies were further considered.

  17. Air pollution: Adverse effects on plants, animals, humans

    The effects of air pollution on our health, which cause many diseases like asthma, cancer, and many respiratory diseases (not only in youngsters but also in infants and the elderly) and on our ...

  18. Effects of air pollution on animal health

    IJESRT Journal. Air pollution is a serious problem all over the world which causes terrific loss to human health and other living being. Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2),Particulate Matter (PM2.5, PM10), Ozone (O3), Lead (Pb), Carbon Monoxide (CO), Benzene (C6H6) and Nickel (Ni) are some of the parameters which have significant ...

  19. Effects of Air Pollution: on Human Health, Animals and Atmosphere

    The local weather conditions are highly susceptible to air pollution. Its impact on temperature, humidity, rainfall and clouds is apparent. The 'smog dom' on large urban centres is the result of air pollution. Due to air pollution, visibility also reduces. 4. Other Effects: Air pollution can also cause damage to property and materials.

  20. Impact of air pollution on plants and animals

    Thus, summing up the effects of air pollution on animals: The health of the animals as a whole, its reproduction and weakness to diseases are the highlighted ones. Death of the animals at a higher rate due to diseases or illness. in the increase in the species, which was a food for the extinct species.

  21. The Effects Of Air Pollution On Plants, Animals, And Structures

    Descriptive Analysis: Air Pollution in California. Holly Torres. California Baptist University. November 11, 2015. Background Information Air pollution has adverse effects on plants, animals, human beings, and structures; air pollution is caused by the introduction of foreign elements, fumes, and other impurities in the air.

  22. Effects of air pollutants on man, animals, plants and buildings

    Air pollution has become a major public concern since the beginning of industrialization, including motor car exhaust since the past three decades. Besides direct effects on living organisms, effects on buildings as well as on climate have to be considered.

  23. Pollution's Effects on Animals Essay Sample

    It is slowly building up in the Ocean as well as on land which is horrible for both animals and humans. Data shows that around 100,000 mammals die every year because of plastic and 4.2 million people die a year because of air pollution. There are different types of pollution such as air pollution, water pollution, and land pollution.

  24. Understanding the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health Effects of Air

    Search 219,210,474 papers from all fields of science. Search. Sign In Create Free Account. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.323673; Corpus ID: 269385362; Understanding the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health Effects of Air Pollution in the Context of Cumulative Exposomic Impacts @article{Khraishah2024UnderstandingTC, title={Understanding the ...

  25. Deadly and growing impact of air pollution laid bare in new UNICEF

    The fifth edition of the report, released by the Health Effects Institute (HEI), revealed that air pollution caused 8.1 million deaths worldwide in 2021 and many millions are dealing with debilitating chronic diseases, leaving healthcare systems, economies, and societies.. Further, it found that children under five are particularly vulnerable to air pollution, leaving over 700,000 in this age ...

  26. How Environmental Regulation Affects Pollution Reduction and ...

    Faced with the dual challenges of environmental pollution and climate change, it is of great significance to study the impact of relevant environmental regulations on the synergistic effect of pollution reduction and carbon emission reduction and their influence mechanisms. Based on a theoretical analysis using the panel data of 30 provinces in China, a spatial econometric model and an ...