Popular Articles
Sorry! nothing found for
How can I check the status of my submitted paper?
Modified on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 04:59 PM
To check the status of your submission in our system, log into your ScholarOne Manuscripts account, and click on “Author.” Under the Author Dashboard Section, click on “Submitted Manuscripts.”
Please note that the following definitions generally apply to most journals. Each journal follows its own workflow, so some terms may not apply. Please contact the journal's editorial office for clarification.
Please see our resources on the peer review process and tips on How to Get Published .
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Let us know how can we improve this article! *
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article
After submitting
In this section:
- NEW! Featured Author Support
- Tracking your submission
- My paper has been accepted – what next?
- Appeals and rebuttals
- BMJ Article Transfer Service
- Abstracting and indexing
- Archiving, permissions and copyright
- Article metrics and alerts
- Correction and retraction policies
- Publication embargo
- Rapid responses
The review process
1. Awaiting Editorial Production Assistant Processing
The Editorial Production Assistant will carry out quality checks on your article at which point you may need to provide further information before your article is sent for Peer Review.
2. Awaiting Editor Assignment:
Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected.
3. Awaiting Reviewer Selection
Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. For most articles, a minimum of two reviews are required. Articles can be sent to multiple prospective reviewers before the required number are secured.
4. Peer Review in Progress
Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again.
5. Awaiting Editor Decision
Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. The Editor will take into account the expert reviewers’ opinions to make an informed decision of accept, reject or revise.
6. In Production
Your article has been accepted and you will receive an email to confirm. Your article will move through the final quality checks and in to Production where it will be processed for publication. You will be emailed by the Production Editor with a timeline and be provided with a link to a platform called Publishing at Work where you can continue to track your article’s progress. More information about the Production process can be found here .
- Active Submissions
This page will list any of your submissions to the journal that are still in process and are either complete or incomplete (in which case you can return and finish the submission at any point).
Each completed submission will fall into one of the following categories:
Awaiting Assignment : the submission has been completed by you; you can no longer delete the submission from the system yourself. The Editor can now see the submission, and must assign an Editor or Section Editor to it.
Queued for Review : the submission has been vetted and is now in the review process. You should receive notice shortly on the review decision.
Queued for Editing : the submission has completed the review process and been accepted for publication; it will now make its way through the system’s copyediting, layout editing and proofreading processes.
In the example below, there is one submission in process and it is awaiting assignment. The journal is only charging a fee to fasttrack submission. If a journal does not charge submission fees of any kind, this link will not appear. The author must use the Pay link to proceed if fees are required.
As the author, you can click on the hyperlinked title of any listed submission and review it. Clicking a submission title will bring you to your submission’s Summary page. From here, you could revise the title or abstract by clicking the Edit Metadata link. If the editor asks for revisions, you will upload the changes this way too (in the Review section of your submission).
- Introduction
- OJS Features
- Viewing and Reading Overview
- System Requirements
- Getting Help
- Community Contributions
- Test-Drive OJS
- Common Interface Elements
- Journal-Specific Interface Elements
- Available Roles within OJS
- Registering with a Journal
- Viewing and Changing your Profile
- Resetting your Password
- Site Settings
- Hosted Journals
- Sitewide Language Settings
- Authentication Sources
- Administrative Functions
- Step One: Details
- Step Two: Policies
- Step Three: Submissions
- Step Four: Management
- Step Five: The Look
- Announcements
- The Files Browser
- Journal Sections
- Review Forms
- Prepared Email
- Reading Tools
- Statistics and Reports
- Individual Subscriptions
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Metadata Plugins
- Authorization Plugins
- Block Plugins
- Citation Plugins
- Gateway Plugins
- Generic Plugins
- Implicit Authentication Plugins
- Import/Export Plugins
- Payment Plugins
- Report Plugins
- Theme Plugins
- Install a New Plugin
- Import/Export Data
- Emailing Users
- Enrolling Existing Users
- Show Users with No Role
- Creating Users
- Merge Users
- Submission Step One: Starting the Submission
- Submission Step Two: Uploading the Submission
- Submission Step Three: Entering the Submission’s Metadata
- Submission Step Four: Uploading Supplementary Files
- Submission Step Five: Confirming the Submission
- Submissions Summary Page
- Submissions Review Page
- Submissions Editing Page
- Submissions
- Searching Submissions
- Submission Summary
- Editor Decision
- Copyediting
- Layout Editing
- Proofreading
- Submission References
- Submission Archives
- Accessing Content
Back to all documentation .
Documentation Interest Group
Contributing Documentation
Translating Guide
Community Forum
Public Knowledge Project
PKP|Publishing Services
What does the FEDREC process status "Awaiting scrolling and DoD approvals" mean?
WO_fed_rec_board_staffing_fy17.pdf
- What does the Army Review Board Agency (ARBA) status of "Awaiting Implementation" mean? 3 Votes 5 Comments
- Does anyone know the FedRec scrolling status for scroll: P18-21? 7 Votes 9 Comments
- How long does the scrolling process usually take? 5 Votes 6 Comments
- Does anyone know the FedRec scrolling status for scroll: P18-21? 10 Votes 8 Comments
- Fedrec scroll status saying awaiting scrolling and DOD approvals; D05-23 and it’s red....? 7 Votes 16 Comments
- Awaiting scrolling and DoD approvals; List ID L05-23; 43 Days in DoD Approval cycle. D...? 2 Votes 2 Comments
Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.
- Capabilities
- Explore All Groups
- Business Services
- Privacy Policy
Welcome to RallyPoint!
These Are The Voyages: A Star Trek Podcast
https://feed.podbean.com/trtvpod/feed.xml
Welcome to These Are The Voyages: A Star Trek Podcast. This is your invitation to beam aboard and join us as we have fun together talking Trek. On the 7s of the month join us as we talk about an episode, book, a character, or anything that piques our interest. Grab your tricorder, communicator, and let‘s Boldly Go and Make It So.
Thursday Oct 17, 2019
Episode 00: Awaiting Assignment
Hello and welcome to this introductory episode of These Are The Voyages. This episode talks about the mission of exploration this podcast is on and ways you can become involved in it. Make sure to like our page on Facebook, and join the group to get involved. You can also hail us by sending subspace communications the following ways:
Email: [email protected]
Voice only transmission: 817-752-4757
Mail: PO BOX 2455 Azle, TX 76098
- Download 349
Comments (0)
To leave or reply to comments, please download free Podbean iOS App or Android App
No Comments
To leave or reply to comments, please download free Podbean App.
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Assignment of the methanol oh-stretch overtone spectrum using the pattern recognition method †.
* Corresponding authors
a Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Université catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium E-mail: [email protected]
b Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, B-1180 Uccle, Belgium
c Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère, Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale, UR4493, 189A Avenue Maurice Schumann, 59140 Dunkerque, France
d Université de Lille, CNRS, UMR 8523 – PhLAM – Physique des Lasers, Atomes et Molécules, F-59000 Lille, France
e Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, CEA, CELIA, UMR5107, F33405 Talence, France
f Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LIPhy, Grenoble, France
We present the measurement and analysis of the 2OH stretching band of methanol between 7165 cm −1 and 7230 cm −1 cooled down to 26 ± 12 K in a buffer gas cooling experiment. Measurements were performed with a cavity ring-down spectrometer having a detection limit α min = 2 × 10 −10 cm −1 . A total of 350 rovibrational transitions were assigned and 62 rovibrational transitions were tentatively assigned. This assignment was performed using the pattern recognition method developed by Rakvoský et al. [ Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2021, 23 , 20193–20200]. In this work, we extended their method by using information on the relative intensities of the transitions to add one criterion to the validation of the assignments, allowing us to firmly assign 188 additional rovibrational transitions and to tentatively assign 14 more compared to the ir work.
Supplementary files
- Supplementary information PDF (453K)
Article information
Download Citation
Permissions.
Assignment of the methanol OH-stretch overtone spectrum using the pattern recognition method
A. Libert, A. Roucou, B. Hays, R. Glorieux, S. Robert, B. Fabre, S. Kassi, X. Urbain and C. Lauzin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , 2024, Advance Article , DOI: 10.1039/D4CP00757C
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence . You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.
Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content .
Social activity
Search articles by author.
This article has not yet been cited.
Advertisements
- Manuscript Status
Q: What can I do if my submission remains 'Awaiting Reviewer Assignment' for a long time?
I submitted my manuscript to a journal. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. So, please give me advice. Should I withdraw the manuscript from the journal OR suggest a number of reviewers from different countries to the editor? Finally, thank you.
Asked on 12 Dec, 2019
The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of reviewers (usually two or three) for the peer review. This could be due to the approaching holiday season; the frequent changes in the status could reflect the frequent changes to leave plans by potential reviewers. It could also be that some reviewers who were contacted could not take up the review due to a conflict of interest or a subject mismatch. Do not worry. A frequent change of this status does not mean the editor will reject the manuscript; it just means it will take longer. So, I would not suggest withdrawing the manuscript now. You could wait until mid-January, that is, until after the holiday season. Until then, as you have very thoughtfully mentioned, you could write to the editor suggesting alternative reviewers. This also shows how proactively you are thinking about your manuscript and how eager you are about its potential publication. All the best!
Related reading:
- Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"?
- Why is the status of my revised manuscript showing "Awaiting reviewer assignment"?
Answered by Editage Insights on 13 Dec, 2019
- Upvote this Answer
This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage
Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage.
Trending Searches
- Statement of the problem
- Background of study
- Scope of the study
- Types of qualitative research
- Rationale of the study
- Concept paper
- Literature review
- Introduction in research
- Under "Editor Evaluation"
- Ethics in research
Recent Searches
- Review paper
- Responding to reviewer comments
- Predatory publishers
- Scope and delimitations
- Open access
- Plagiarism in research
- Journal selection tips
- Editor assigned
- Types of articles
- "Reject and Resubmit" status
- Decision in process
- Conflict of interest
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
You have three queries. Let's take them one by one. Meaning of 'Awaiting Editor Assignment' This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal's scope and also adhering to the journal's guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study.
1. I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them.
Also known as: technical check, initial QC (AIP), admin checklist (IEEE), Awaiting Editorial Office Processing (ScholarOne), quality check (NPG) Typical duration: A few workdays. Editor assignment or invitation. Based on the topic of the manuscript and suggestions by the authors, an editor is assigned to handle the manuscript.
Initially, once your paper was submitted, the status showed "Admin not assigned." Then it was assigned to an Editorial Assistant (EA) for admin check. This is when the status changed to "EA: [name]." Once the EA started checking the manuscript, the status changed to "Awaiting ED Assignment." At this stage, the EA goes through the paper and ...
Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. This status typically means your manuscript is awaiting assignment to an editor after the initial review of the submission. Depending on the journal's workflow, this status could also indicate when the editorial office ...
2. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. 3. Awaiting Reviewer Selection
Is it normal for a journal submission to show "awaiting assignment" for more than a month? Ask Question Asked 9 years, 10 months ago. Modified 2 years, 5 months ago. Viewed 6k times 4 I submitted a paper more than one month ago. The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment".
All Answers (4) Ans Al Rashid. Hamad bin Khalifa University. 'Awaiting decision' means the required reviews to make a decision were completed. But the editor has sent your manuscript to another ...
Read 18 answers by scientists with 2 recommendations from their colleagues to the question asked by Bhuvaneswari Anbalagan on Jun 19, 2018
Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. For most manuscripts, in the ...
I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard.
Each completed submission will fall into one of the following categories: Awaiting Assignment: the submission has been completed by you; you can no longer delete the submission from the system yourself. The Editor can now see the submission, and must assign an Editor or Section Editor to it. Queued for Review: the submission has been vetted and ...
A revised manuscript submitted in response to the decision will go through additional review by at least the Associate Editor and Senior Editor, and also typically by the reviewers who did the review of the original manuscript if major revisions were required. The revised manuscript can receive any of the same four decisions described above.
We would like to show you a description here but the site won't allow us.
6. First, congratulations!! "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" is part of the accepted workflow. Once accepted, some journals have a set of tasks that a manuscript goes through. One of the steps available (and being used here) is batching and sending of the manuscript to the journals production service. It will wait until a predetermined condition ...
2LT (Join to see) - Yes and No on the clarity of the status. It doesn't tell you exactly where it's at, but it does show you which stage it's in.…. [See More] I am currently waiting on Fedrec for O-2, and mine also has said 0 Days, and "Awaiting scrolling and DoD approvals" since at least December.
Hello and welcome to this introductory episode of These Are The Voyages. This episode talks about the mission of exploration this podcast is on and ways you can become involved in it. Make sure to like our page on Facebook, and join the group to get involved. You can also hail us by sending subspace communications the following ways: Email: [email protected] Voice only transmission: 817-752 ...
The acronym ME most likely stands for "Managing Editor" or "Manuscript Editor", and so the message says that the paper is awaiting processing by this person. As shown in this question on the process for journals , that initial "processing" step usually involves an initial assessment by that initial editor, and if it passes that hurdle it will ...
The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. It's more common to have a challenge finding peer reviewers, unless with this journal or for this paper, the review is to be done internally. If that's not the case, the journal is having a challenge assigning an editor to ...
We present the measurement and analysis of the 2OH stretching band of methanol between 7165 cm−1 and 7230 cm−1 cooled down to 26 ± 12 K in a buffer gas cooling experiment. Measurements were performed with a cavity ring-down spectrometer having a detection limit αmin = 2 × 10−10 cm−1. A total of 350 rovibrational tr
The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review."
1. You can send a request for an update at any time. You may or may not learn anything. There could be many reasons for a delay, including not sending too many papers to one editor and needing to find another who is suitable. But an average of 30 days tells you little about the distribution of actual times.
The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the scope of the journal and if it is of sufficient interest to the journal's readership. He will then assign a AE or an academic editor who ...
I submitted my manuscript to a journal. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to 'Reviewer selection,' then 'Reviewer assignment', then 'Reviewer selection', and then 'Reviewer assignment' again. The status has not changed to 'Under review'. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. So, please give me advice. Should I ...