Descriptive statistics and correlations
S/N | Variable | Mean | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Age | 2.012 | 0.8731 | |||||||
2 | Monthly income | 1.988 | 1.7608 | 0.425** | ||||||
3 | Educational qualification | 3.479 | 1.2608 | 0.358** | 0.230** | |||||
4 | Online buying frequency | 2.411 | 1.5361 | 0.133* | 0.133* | −0.039 | ||||
5 | Terminal value | 3.461 | 1.1316 | −0.043 | −0.258** | 0.079 | −0.098 | |||
6 | Instrumental value | 3.588 | 0.9151 | −0.068 | −0.041 | 0.082 | 0.011 | 0.464** | ||
7 | Fashion consciousness | 3.046 | 1.104 | 0.241** | 0.024 | 0.032 | 0.033 | 0.474** | 0.177** | |
8 | Consumer purchase behaviour | 2.736 | 1.22 | −0.08 | −0.116 | 0.001 | −0.106 | 0.618** | 0.456** | 0.377** |
Model 1 control variables only | Model 2 (direct 1) | Model 3 (direct 2) | Model 4 (direct 3) | Model 5 (all direct effects) | Model 6 (direct and indirect effects) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | −0.051 | −0.074 | −0.040 | 0.169** | −0.081 | −0.088 |
Age group | −0.096 | 0.095 | −0.081 | −0.058 | 0.062 | 0.071 |
Marital status | 0.039 | −0.045 | −0.022 | 0.059 | −0.045 | −0.053 |
Employment status | −0.086 | −0.047 | −0.101 | −0.088 | −0.066 | −0.038 |
Monthly income | ||||||
Type of family | ||||||
Social well-being | 0.633*** | |||||
Physical well-being | 0.451*** | |||||
Psychological well-being – Eudaimonic | 0.413*** | |||||
Psychological well-being – hedonic | ||||||
Social well- being | 0.048*** | 0.348** | ||||
Physical well- being | 0.219*** | 0.111 | ||||
Psychological well-being Eudaimonic | 0.142** | 0.025 | ||||
Psychological well-being – hedonic | ||||||
Model | 0.159 | 0.627*** | 0.474*** | 0.430*** | 0.664*** | 0.670*** |
Model | 0.025 | 0.393*** | 0.224*** | 0.185*** | 0.441*** | 0.449*** |
Change in | 0.368 | −0.169 | −0.039 | 0.256 | 0.008 | |
Model | 1.521 | 30.129*** | 13.479*** | 10.581*** | 26.038*** | 23.445*** |
Durbin–Watson | 1.938 | 1.900 | 1.871 | 1.643 | 1.880 | 1.913 |
Note(s): n = 421; standardised regression coefficients are reported
* p < 0.10; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01
Agnihotri , A. and Bhattacharya , S. ( 2019 ), “ Unethical consumer behavior: the role of institutional and socio-cultural factors ”, Journal of Consumer Marketing , Vol. 36 No. 1 , pp. 124 - 135 , doi: 10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2093 .
Allen , M.W. , Hung Ng , S. and Wilson , M. ( 2002 ), “ A functional approach to instrumental and terminal values and the value-attitude-behaviour system of consumer choice ”, European Journal of Marketing , Vol. 36 Nos 1/2 , pp. 111 - 135 .
Aminu , S.A. ( 2013 ), “ Challenges militating against adoption of online shopping in retail industry in Nigeria ”, Journal of Marketing Management , Vol. 1 No. 1 , pp. 23 - 33 .
Ansari , Z.A. ( 2018 ), “ Socio cultural influences on online shopping behaviour ”, Journal of Business and Retail Management Research , Vol. 13 No. 2 , pp. 255 - 263 .
Arora , S. and Sahney , S. ( 2018 ), “ Antecedents to consumers' showrooming behaviour: an integrated TAM-TPB framework ”, Journal of Consumer Marketing , Vol. 35 No. 4 , pp. 438 - 450 , doi: 10.1108/JCM-07-2016-1885 .
Azjen , I. ( 1985 ), “ From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior ”, in Kuhl , J. and Beckman , J. (Eds), ActionControl: from Cognition to Behavior , Springer , Heidelberg , pp. 11 - 39 .
Azjen , I. ( 1991 ), “ The theory of planned behavior ”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , Vol. 50 No. 2 , pp. 179 - 211 .
Azjen , I. and Fishbein , M. ( 1980 ), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , Prentice-Hall , Englewood Cliffs, NJ .
Babin , B.J. and James , K.W. ( 2010 ), “ A brief retrospective and introspective on value ”, European Business Review , Vol. 22 No. 5 , pp. 471 - 478 .
Battacherjee , A. ( 2000 ), “ Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages ”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans , Vol. 30 No. 4 , pp. 411 - 420 .
Beck , M. and Crié , D. ( 2018 ), “ I virtually try it I want it! Virtual Fitting Room: a tool to increase online and offline exploratory behavior, patronage and purchase intentions ”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , Vol. 40 , pp. 279 - 286 .
Bhardwaj , V. and Fairhurst , A. ( 2010 ), “ Fast fashion: response to changes in the fashion industry ”, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research , Vol. 20 No. 1 , pp. 165 - 173 .
Bonetti , F. , Warnaby , G. and Quinn , L. ( 2018 ), “ Augmented reality and virtual reality in physical and online retailing: a review, synthesis and research agenda ”, in Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality , Springer , Cham , pp. 119 - 132 .
Botti , R. ( 2019 ), “ Fashion sector outsourcing to African countries: taking advantage of low-cost labor? ”, in Moreno-Gavara , C. and Jiménez-Zarco , A. (Eds), Sustainable Fashion. Palgrave Studies of Entrepreneurship in Africa , Palgrave Macmillan , Cham .
Bridges , E. and Florsheim , R. ( 2008 ), “ Hedonic and utilitarian shopping goals: the online experience ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol. 61 No. 4 , pp. 309 - 314 .
Bruce , M. and Daly , L. ( 2006 ), “ Buyer behaviour for fast fashion ”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management , Vol. 10 No. 3 , pp. 329 - 344 .
Casidy , R. ( 2012 ), “ An empirical investigation of the relationship between personality traits, prestige sensitivity, and fashion consciousness of Generation Y in Australia ”, Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) , Vol. 20 No. 4 , pp. 242 - 249 .
Cohen , J. and Cohen , P. ( 1983 ), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , Erlbaum. United States, Hillsdale, NJ .
Conner , M. ( 2020 ), “ Theory of planned behavior ”, in Handbook of Sport Psychology , pp. 1 - 18 .
Craig , S.C. and Douglas , S.P. ( 2006 ), “ Beyond national culture: implications of cultural dynamics for consumer research ”, International Marketing Review , Vol. 23 No. 3 , pp. 322 - 342 .
Falode , B.O. , Amubode , A.A. , Adegunwa , M.O. and Ogunduyile , S.R. ( 2016 ), “ Online and offline shopping motivation of apparel consumers in Ibadan metropolis, Nigeria ”, International Journal of Marketing Studies , Vol. 8 No. 1 , pp. 150 - 160 .
Fernandes , C. ( 2013 ), “ Analysis of counterfeit fashion purchase behaviour in UAE ”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal , Vol. 17 No. 1 , pp. 85 - 97 .
Fernández-Durán , J.J. ( 2016 ), “ Defining generational cohorts for marketing in Mexico ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol. 69 No. 2 , pp. 435 - 444 .
Fernie , J. and Sparks , L. ( 1998 ), “ 1 Retail logistics: changes and challenges ”, in Logistics and Retail Management: Emerging Issues and New Challenges in the Retail Supply Chain , Vol. 1 .
George , J.F. ( 2002 ), “ Influences on the intent to make Internet purchases ”, Internet Research , Vol. 12 No. 2 , pp. 165 - 180 .
George , J.F. ( 2004 ), “ The theory of planned behaviour and Internet purchasing ”, Internet Research , Vol. 14 No. 3 , pp. 198 - 212 .
Gujarati , D.N. ( 2003 ), Basic Econometrics , 4th ed. , McGraw-Hill , Boston .
Hagberg , J. , Sundstrom , M. and Egels-Zandén , N. ( 2016 ), “ The digitalisation of retailing: an exploratory framework ”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management , Vol. 44 No. 7 , pp. 694 - 712 .
Hagger , M.S. ( 2019 ), “ The reasoned action approach and the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior ”, in Dunn , D.S. (Ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Psychology , Oxford University Press , New York, NY , doi: 10.1093/OBO/9780199828340-0240 .
Hair , J.F. , Anderson , R.E. , Tatham , R.L. and Black , W.C. ( 1998 ), Multivariate Data Analysis , 5th ed. , Prentice-Hall , Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey , 07632 .
Ham , M. , Jeger , M. and Frajman Ivković , A. ( 2015 ), “ The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food ”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja , Vol. 28 No. 1 , pp. 738 - 748 .
Hope Allwood , E. ( 2016 ), “ Is virtual reality the future of the fashion show? ”, available at: https://www.dazeddigital.com/fashion/article/30163/1/is-virtual-reality-the-future-of-the-fashion-show .
Jarvenpaa , S.L. and Todd , P.A. ( 1997a ), “ Is there a future for retailing on the Internet? ”, in Peterson , R.A. (Ed.), Electronic Marketing and the Consumer , Sage , Thousand Oaks, CA , pp. 139 - 154 .
Jarvenpaa , S.L. and Todd , P.A. ( 1997b ), “ Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the world wide web ”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce , Vol. 1 No. 2 , pp. 59 - 88 .
Johnstone , M.-L. , Ruane , L. and Wallace , E. ( 2013 ), “ Generation Y females online: insights from brand narratives ”, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal , Vol. 16 No. 3 , pp. 315 - 335 .
Kacen , J.J. and Lee , J.A. ( 2002 ), “ The influence of culture on consumer impulsive buying behavior ”, Journal of Consumer Psychology , Vol. 12 No. 2 , pp. 163 - 176 .
Kaushik , V. , Kumar , A. , Gupta , H. . and Dixit , G. ( 2020 ), “ Modelling and prioritizing the factors for online apparel return using BWM approach ”, Electronic Commerce Research . doi: 10.1007/s10660-020-09406-3 .
Kautish , P. and Sharma , R. ( 2018 ), “ Consumer values, fashion consciousness and behavioural intentions in the online fashion retail sector ”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management , Vol. 46 No. 10 , pp. 894 - 914 .
Kennedy , H.E. , Baumann , S. and Johnston , J. ( 2019 ), “ Eating for taste and eating for change: ethical consumption as a high-status practice ”, Social Forces , Vol. 98 No. 1 , pp. 381 - 402 .
Khalifa , M. and Limayem , M. ( 2003 ), “ Drivers of internet shopping ”, Communications of the ACM , Vol. 46 No. 12 , pp. 233 - 239 .
Kilduff , P. ( 2005 ), “ Patterns of strategic adjustment in the US textile and apparel industries since 1979 ”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal , Vol. 9 No. 2 , pp. 180 - 194 .
Kim , D.E. and LaBat , K. ( 2013 ), “ Consumer experience in using 3D virtual garment simulation technology ”, Journal of the Textile Institute , Vol. 104 No. 8 , pp. 819 - 829 .
Koon , O. , Chan , R.Y.K. and Sharma , P. ( 2020 ), “ Moderating effects of socio-cultural values on pro-environmental behaviors ”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning , Vol. 38 No. 5 , pp. 603 - 618 , doi: 10.1108/MIP-10-2019-0534 .
Liang , J. and Xu , Y. ( 2018 ), “ Second‐hand clothing consumption: a generational cohort analysis of the Chinese market ”, International Journal of Consumer Studies , Vol. 42 No. 1 , pp. 120 - 130 .
Limayem , M. , Khalifa , M. and Frini , A. ( 2000 ), “ What makes consumers buy from Internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping ”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans , Vol. 30 No. 4 , pp. 421 - 432 .
Loker , S. , Cowie , L. , Ashdown , S. and Lewis , V.D. ( 2004 ), “ Female consumers' reactions to body scanning ”, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , Vol. 22 No. 4 , pp. 151 - 160 .
Loker , S. , Ashdown , S. and Carnrite , E. ( 2008 ), “ Dress in the third dimension: online interactivity and its new horizons ”, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , Vol. 26 No. 2 , pp. 164 - 176 .
MacCallum , R.C. , Widaman , K.F. , Zhang , S. and Hong , S. ( 1999 ), “ Sample size in factor analysis ”, Psychological Methods , Vol. 4 No. 1 , pp. 84 - 99 .
Mahmoud , A.B. , Fuxman , L. , Mohr , I. , Reisel , W.D. and Grigoriou , N. ( 2021 ), “ “We aren't your reincarnation!” workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol. 42 No. 1 , pp. 193 - 209 , doi: 10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0448 .
Marsh , H.W. , Balla , J.R. and McDonald , R.P. ( 1988 ), “ Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size ”, Psychological Bulletin , Vol. 103 No. 3 , pp. 391 - 410 .
Marsh , H.W. , Kit-Tai , H. , Balla , J.R. and Grayson , D. ( 1998 ), “ Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis ”, Multivariate Behavioural Research , Vol. 33 No. 2 , pp. 181 - 220 .
Matic , M. and Vojvodic , K. ( 2017 ), “ Managing online environment cues: evidence from Generation Y consumers ”, International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing , Vol. 8 No. 1 , pp. 77 - 90 .
Miell , S. , Gill , S. and Vazquez , D. ( 2018 ), “ Enabling the digital fashion consumer through fit and sizing technology ”, Journal of Global Fashion Marketing , Vol. 9 No. 1 , pp. 9 - 23 .
Mulyanegara , R.C. ( 2011 ), “ The relationship between market orientation, brand orientation and perceived benefits in the non-profit sector: a customer-perceived paradigm ”, Journal of Strategic Marketing , Vol. 19 No. 5 , pp. 429 - 441 .
Niemeier , S. , Zocchi , A. and Catena , M. ( 2013 ), Reshaping Retail: Why Technology Is Transforming the Industry and How to Win in the New Consumer Driven World , John Wiley & Sons .
Nwankwo , S. , Hamelin , N. and Khaled , M. ( 2014 ), “ Consumer values, motivation and purchase intention for luxury goods ”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , Vol. 21 No. 5 , pp. 735 - 744 .
Ogbuji , C.N. and Udom , A.O. ( 2018 ), “ A holistic presentation of online shopping in Nigeria ”, Researchers World , Vol. 9 No. 3 , pp. 22 - 33 .
Pantano , E. and Viassone , M. ( 2015 ), “ Engaging consumers on new integrated multichannel retail settings: challenges for retailers ”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , Vol. 25 , pp. 106 - 114 .
Pavlou , P.A. ( 2002 ), “ What drives electronic commerce? A theory of planned behavior perspective ”, Academy of Management Proceedings , Vol. 2002 , pp. A1 - A6 .
Pentecost , R. and Andrews , L. ( 2010 ), “ Fashion retailing and the bottom line: the effects of generational cohorts, gender, fashion fanship, attitudes and impulse buying on fashion expenditure ”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , Vol. 17 No. 1 , pp. 43 - 52 .
Pepper , M. , Jackson , T. and Uzzell , D. ( 2009 ), “ An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours ”, International Journal of Consumer Studies , Vol. 33 No. 2 , pp. 126 - 136 .
Renko , S. and Druzijanic , M. ( 2014 ), “ Perceived usefulness of innovative technology in retailing: consumers' and retailers' point of view ”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , Vol. 21 No. 5 , pp. 836 - 843 .
Rohan , M.J. ( 2000 ), “ A rose by any name? The values construct ”, Personality and Social Psychology Review , Vol. 4 , pp. 255 - 277 .
Scarpi , D. ( 2012 ), “ Work and fun on the internet: the effects of utilitarianism and hedonism online ”, Journal of Interactive Marketing , Vol. 26 No. 1 , pp. 53 - 67 .
Schmidt , J. , Dörner , K. , Berg , A. , Schumacher , T. and Bockholdt , K. ( 2015 ), The Opportunities in Online Luxury Fashion Sales are Rising, but what Do Consumers Expect from a Luxury Digital Experience , McKinsey & Company , New Delhi .
Sima , C. ( 2016 ), “ Generations BB, X, Y, Z, a–the changing consumer in the hospitality industry ”, in The Routledge Handbook of Hotel Chain Management , Routledge , pp. 497 - 505 .
Singh , S. and Srivastava , S. ( 2019 ), “ Engaging consumers in multichannel online retail environment: a moderation study of platform type on interaction of e-commerce and m-commerce ”, Journal of Modelling in Management , Vol. 14 No. 1 , pp. 49 - 76 , doi: 10.1108/JM2-09-2017-0098 .
Song , H.K. and Ashdown , S.P. ( 2012 ), “ Development of automated custom-made pants driven by body shape ”, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , Vol. 30 No. 4 , pp. 315 - 329 .
Song , J. and Zahedi , F. ( 2001 ), “ Web design in e-commerce: a theory and empirical analysis ”, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Systems , pp. 205 - 220 .
Suh , B. and Han , I. ( 2003 ), “ The impact of customer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce ”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce , Vol. 7 No. 3 , pp. 135 - 161 .
Suzuki , S. and Park , J. ( 2018 ), “ Consumer evaluation of healthy, unpleasant-tasting food and the post-taste effect of positive information ”, Food Quality and Preference , Vol. 66 , pp. 107 - 110 .
Tan , M. and Teo , T.S.H. ( 2000 ), “ Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking ”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems , Vol. 1 No. 5 , pp. 1 - 42 .
Tan , K.L. , Lew , T.Y. and Sim , A.K. ( 2019 ), “ An innovative solution to leverage meaningful work to attract, retain and manage generation Y employees in Singapore's hotel industry ”, Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes , Vol. 11 No. 2 , pp. 204 - 216 .
Tendai , M. and Crispen , C. ( 2009 ), “ In-store shopping environment and impulsive buying ”, African Journal of Marketing Management , Vol. 1 No. 4 , pp. 102 - 108 .
Usman , M.U. and Kumar , P. ( 2020 ), “ Factors influencing consumer intention to shop online in Nigeria: a conceptual study ”, Vision , pp. 1 - 8 , doi: 10.1177/0972262920926797 .
Varrella , S. ( 2020 ), “ Demographics of Nigeria - statistics & facts ”, Statista , available at: https://www.statista.com/topics/6477/demographics-of-nigeria/#:˜:text=One%20main%20feature%20which%20characterizes,well%20as%20in%20the%20world .
Verma , V.K. and Chandra , B. ( 2018 ), “ An application of theory of planned behavior to predict young Indian consumers' green hotel visit intention ”, Journal of Cleaner Production , Vol. 172 , pp. 1152 - 1162 .
Xue , L. , Parker , C.J. and Hart , C.A. ( 2019 ), “ How to engage fashion retail with VR: a consumer perspective ”, 5th International AR and VR Conference , Munich, June 12-14th .
Harrison , D.A. , Mykytyn , P.P. and Riemenschneider , C.K. ( 1997 ), “ Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: theory and empirical tests ”, Information Systems Research , Vol. 8 No. 2 , pp. 171 - 195 .
Pantano , E. ( 2016 ), “ Engaging consumer through storefront: evidences from integrating interactive technologies ”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services , Vol. 28 , pp. 149 - 154 .
Taylor , S. and Todd , P.A. ( 1995 ), “ Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models ”, Information Systems Research , Vol. 6 No. 2 , pp. 144 - 176 .
Supplementary materials.
PRR-04-2021-0019_suppl1.doc (17 KB)
All feedback is valuable.
Please share your general feedback
Contact Customer Support
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
Managing deadstock in the fashion and apparel industry: an exploration of causes, solutions and technological interventions †.
2. review of existing literature, 2.1. deadstock in the fashion and apparel industry, 2.2. current strategies used to deal with deadstock, 2.3. technological interventions to mitigate the problem of deadstock, 3. discussion, implications and future scope, 4. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
Click here to enlarge figure
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Banikya, A.K.; Ranade, P.; Verma, I.K. Managing Deadstock in the Fashion and Apparel Industry: An Exploration of Causes, Solutions and Technological Interventions. Eng. Proc. 2024 , 66 , 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066009
Banikya AK, Ranade P, Verma IK. Managing Deadstock in the Fashion and Apparel Industry: An Exploration of Causes, Solutions and Technological Interventions. Engineering Proceedings . 2024; 66(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066009
Banikya, Arnab Kamal, Pranita Ranade, and Indresh Kumar Verma. 2024. "Managing Deadstock in the Fashion and Apparel Industry: An Exploration of Causes, Solutions and Technological Interventions" Engineering Proceedings 66, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024066009
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research
Fashion and Textiles volume 1 , Article number: 20 ( 2014 ) Cite this article
376k Accesses
59 Citations
56 Altmetric
Metrics details
The purpose of this research was to provide a critical review of key research areas within the social psychology of dress. The review addresses published research in two broad areas: (1) dress as a stimulus and its influence on (a) attributions by others, attributions about self, and on one's behavior and (2) relationships between dress, the body, and the self. We identify theoretical approaches used in conducting research in these areas, provide an abbreviated background of research in these areas highlighting key findings, and identify future research directions and possibilities. The subject matter presented features developing topics within the social psychology of dress and is useful for undergraduate students who want an overview of the content area. It is also useful for graduate students (1) who want to learn about the major scholars in these key areas of inquiry who have moved the field forward, or (2) who are looking for ideas for their own thesis or dissertation research. Finally, information in this paper is useful for professors who research or teach the social psychology of dress.
A few social scientists in the 19 th Century studied dress as related to culture, individuals, and social groups, but it was not until the middle of the 20 th Century that home economists began to pursue a scholarly interest in social science aspects of dress (Roach-Higgins 1993 ). Dress is defined as “an assemblage of modifications of the body and/or supplements to the body” (Roach-Higgins & Eicher 1992 , p. 1). Body modifications include cosmetic use, suntanning, piercing, tattooing, dieting, exercising, and cosmetic surgery among others. Body supplements include, but are not limited to, accessories, clothing, hearing aids, and glasses. By the 1950s social science theories from economics, psychology, social psychology, and sociology were being used to study dress and human behavior (Rudd 1991 , p. 24).
A range of topics might be included under the phrase social psychology of dress but we use it to refer to research that attempts to answer questions concerned with how an individual’s dress-related beliefs, attitudes, perceptions, feelings, and behaviors are shaped by others and one’s self. The social psychology of dress is concerned with how an individual’s dress affects the behavior of self as well as the behavior of others toward the self (Johnson & Lennon 2014 ).
Among several topics that could be included in a critical review of research addressing the social psychology of dress, we focused our work on a review of published research in two broad areas: (1) dress as a stimulus and its influence on (a) attributions by others, attributions about self, and on one’s own behavior and (2) relationships between dress, the body, and the self. Our goal was to identify theoretical approaches used in conducting research in these areas, provide an abbreviated background of research in these areas highlighting key findings, and to identify future research directions and possibilities. The content presented features developing topics within the social psychology of dress and is useful for undergraduate students who want an overview of the content area. It is also useful for graduate students (1) who want to learn about the major scholars in these key areas of inquiry who have moved the field forward, or (2) who are looking for ideas for their own thesis or dissertation research. Finally, information in this paper is useful for professors who research or teach the social psychology of dress.
In studying the social psychology of dress, researchers have often focused on dress as a stimulus variable; for example, the effects of dress on impression formation, attributions, and social perception (see Lennon & Davis 1989 ) or the effects of dress on behaviors (see Johnson et al. 2008 ). The context within which dress is perceived (Damhorst 1984-85 ) as well as characteristics of perceivers of clothed individuals (Burns & Lennon 1993 ) also has a profound effect on what is perceived about others. In the remainder of this section we focus on three research streams that center on dress (i.e., body supplements) as stimuli.
In the 1980s researchers were interested in women’s provocative (revealing, sexy) dress and the extent to which men and women attributed the same meaning to it. For example, both Edmonds and Cahoon ( 1986 ) and Cahoon and Edmonds ( 1987 ) found ratings of women who wore provocative dress were more negative than ratings of women who wore non-provocative dress. No specific theory was identified by these authors as guiding their research. Overall, when wearing provocative dress a model was rated more sexually appealing, more attractive, less faithful in marriage, more likely to engage in sexual teasing, more likely to use sex for personal gain, more likely to be sexually experienced, and more likely to be raped than when wearing conservative dress. Cahoon and Edmonds found that men and women made similar judgments, although men’s were more extreme than women’s. Abbey et al. ( 1987 ) studied whether women’s sexual intent and interest as conveyed by revealing dress was misinterpreted by men. The authors developed two dress conditions: revealing (slit skirt, low cut blouse, high heeled shoes) and non-revealing (skirt without a slit, blouse buttoned to neck, boots). Participants rated the stimulus person on a series of adjective traits. As compared to when wearing the non-revealing clothing, when wearing the revealing clothing the stimulus person was rated significantly more flirtatious, sexy, seductive, promiscuous, sophisticated, assertive, and less sincere and considerate. This research was not guided by theory.
Taking this research another step forward, in the 1990s dress researchers began to investigate how women’s provocative (revealing, sexy) dress was implicated in attributions of responsibility for their own sexual assaults (Lewis & Johnson 1989 ; Workman & Freeburg 1999 ; Workman & Orr 1996 ) and sexual harassment (Johnson & Workman 1992 , 1994 ; Workman & Johnson 1991 ). These researchers tended to use attribution theories (McLeod, 2010 ) to guide their research. Their results showed that provocative, skimpy, see-through, or short items of dress, as well as use of heavy makeup (body modification), were cues used to assign responsibility to women for their sexual assaults and experiences of sexual harassment. For example, Johnson and Workman ( 1992 ) studied likelihood of sexual harassment as a function of women’s provocative dress. A model was photographed wearing a dark suit jacket, above-the-knee skirt, a low-cut blouse, dark hose, and high heels (provocative condition) or wearing a dark suit jacket, below-the-knee skirt, high-cut blouse, neutral hose, and moderate heels (non-provocative condition). As compared to when wearing non-provocative dress, when wearing provocative dress the model was rated as significantly more likely to provoke sexual harassment and to be sexually harassed.
Recently, researchers have resurrected the topic of provocative (revealing, sexy) dress. However, their interest is in determining the extent to which women and girls are depicted in provocative dress in the media (in magazines, in online retail stores) and the potential consequences of those depictions, such as objectification. These researchers have often used objectification theory to guide their research. According to objectification theory (Fredrickson & Roberts 1997 ) women living in sexually saturated cultures are looked at, evaluated, and potentially objectified and treated as objects valued for their use by others. Objectification theory focuses on sexual objectification as a function of objectifying gaze, which is experienced in actual social encounters, media depictions of social encounters, and media depictions that focus on bodies and body parts. The theory explains that objectifying gaze evokes an objectified state of consciousness which influences self-perceptions. This objectified state of consciousness has consequences such as habitual body and appearance monitoring and requires cognitive effort that can result in difficulty with task performance (Szymanski et al. 2011 ). In such an environment, women may perceive their bodies from a third-person perspective, treating themselves as objects to be looked at and evaluated.
Self-objectification occurs when people perceive and describe their bodies as a function of appearance instead of accomplishments (Harrison & Fredrickson 2003 ). Experimental research shows that self-objectification in women can be induced by revealing clothing manipulations such as asking women to try on and evaluate the fit of a swimsuit as compared to a bulky sweater (Fredrickson et al. 1998 ).
To examine changes in sexualizing (provocative) characteristics with which girls are portrayed in the media, researchers have content analyzed girls’ clothing in two magazines (Graff et al. 2013 ). Clothing was coded as having sexualizing characteristics (e.g., tightness, bare midriffs, high-heeled shoes) and childlike characteristics (e.g., frills, childlike print, pigtail hair styles). The researchers found an increase in sexualized aspects of dress in depictions of girls from 1971 through 2011. To determine the extent of sexualization in girls’ clothing, researchers have content analyzed girls’ clothing available on 15 retailer websites (Goodin et al. 2011 ). Every girl’s clothing item on each of the retailer websites was coded for sexualizing aspects; 4% was coded as definitely sexualizing. Ambiguously sexualizing clothing (25%) had both sexualizing and childlike characteristics. Abercrombie Kids’ clothing had a higher percentage of sexualizing characteristics than all the other stores (44% versus 4%). These two studies document that girls are increasingly depicted in sexualizing clothing in U.S. media and that they are offered sexualized clothing by major retailers via their websites.
Since girls are increasingly sexualized, to determine if sexualized dress affects how girls are perceived by others Graff et al. ( 2012 ) designed an experiment wherein they manipulated the sexualizing aspects of the clothing of a 5 th grade girl. There were three clothing conditions: childlike (a grey t-shirt, jeans, and black Mary Jane shoes), ambiguously sexualized (leopard print dress of moderate length), highly sexualized (short dress, leopard print cardigan, purse). In the definitely sexualized condition, undergraduate students rated the girl as less moral, self-respecting, capable, determined, competent, and intelligent than when she was depicted in either the childlike or the ambiguously sexualized conditions. Thus, wearing sexualized clothing can affect how girls are perceived by others, so it is possible that sexualized clothing could lead to self-objectification in girls just as in the case of women (Tiggemann & Andrew 2012 ).
Objectification theory has been useful in identifying probable processes underlying the association between women’s provocative dress and negative inferences. In a study using adult stimuli, Gurung and Chrouser ( 2007 ) presented photos of female Olympic athletes in uniform and in provocative (defined as minimal) dress. College women rated the photos and when provocatively dressed, as compared to the uniform condition, the women were rated as more attractive, more feminine, more sexually experienced, more desirable, but also less capable, less strong, less determined, less intelligent, and as having less self-respect. These results are similar to what had previously been found by researchers in the 1980s (Abbey et al. 1987 ; Cahoon & Edmonds 1987 ; Edmonds & Cahoon 1986 ). This outcome is considered objectifying because the overall impression is negative and sexist. Thus, this line of research does more than demonstrate that provocative dress evokes inferences, it suggests the process by which that occurs: provocative dress leads to objectification of the woman so dressed and it is the objectification that leads to the inferences.
In a more direct assessment of the relationship between provocative dress and objectification of others, Holland and Haslam ( 2013 ) manipulated the dress (provocative or plain clothing) of two models (thin or overweight) who were rated equally attractive in facial attractiveness. Since objectification involves inspecting the body, the authors measured participants’ attention to the models’ bodies. Objectification also involves denying human qualities to the objectified person. Two such qualities are perceived agency (e.g., ability to think and form intentions) and moral agency (e.g., capacity to engage in moral or immoral actions). Several findings are relevant to the research on provocative dress. As compared to models wearing plain clothing, models wearing provocative clothing were attributed less perceived agency (e.g., ability to reason, ability to choose) and less moral agency [e.g., “how intentional do you believe the woman’s behavior is?” (p. 463)]. Results showed that more objectified gaze was directed toward the bodies of the models when they were dressed in provocative clothing as compared to when dressed in plain clothing. This outcome is considered objectifying because the models’ bodies were inspected more when wearing provocative dress, and because in that condition they were perceived as having less of the qualities normally attributed to humans.
In an experimental study guided by objectification theory, Tiggemann and Andrew ( 2012 ) studied the effects of clothing on self-perceptions of state self-objectification, state body shame, state body dissatisfaction, and negative mood. However, unlike studies (e.g., Fredrickson et al. 1998 ) in which participants were asked to try on and evaluate either a bathing suit or a sweater, Tiggemann and Andrew instructed their participants to “imagine what you would be seeing, feeling, and thinking” (p. 648) in scenarios. There were four scenarios: thinking about wearing a bathing suit in public, thinking about wearing a bathing suit in a dressing room, thinking about wearing a sweater in public, and thinking about wearing a sweater in a dressing room. The researchers found main effects for clothing such that as compared to thinking about wearing a sweater, thinking about wearing a bathing suit resulted in higher state self-objectification, higher state body shame, higher state body dissatisfaction, and greater negative mood. The fact that the manipulation only involved thinking about wearing clothing, rather than actually wearing such clothing, demonstrates the power of revealing (provocative, sexy) dress in that we only have to think about wearing it to have it affect our self-perceptions.
Taking extant research into account we encourage researchers to continue to investigate the topic of provocative (sexy, revealing) dress for both men and women to replicate the results for women and to determine if revealing dress for men might evoke the kinds of inferences evoked by women wearing revealing dress. Furthermore, research that delineates the role of objectification in the process by which this association between dress and inferences occurs would be useful. Although it would not be ethical to use the experimental strategy used by previous researchers (Fredrickson et al. 1998 ) with children, it is possible that researchers could devise correlational studies to investigate the extent to which wearing and/or viewing sexualized clothing might lead to self- and other-objectification in girls.
Researchers who study the social psychology of dress have seldom focused on dress color. However, in the 1980s and 1990s a few researchers investigated color in the context of retail color analysis systems that focused on personal coloring (Abramov 1985 ; Francis & Evans 1987 ; Hilliker & Rogers 1988 ; Radeloff 1991 ). For example, Francis and Evans found that stimulus persons were actually perceived positively when not wearing their recommended personal colors. Hilliker and Rogers surveyed managers of apparel stores about the use of color analysis systems and found some impact on the marketplace, but disagreement among the managers on the value of the systems. Abramov critiqued color analysis for being unclear, ambiguous, and for the inability to substantiate claims. Most of these studies were not guided by a psychological theory of color.
Since the 1990s, researchers have developed a theory of color psychology (Elliot & Maier 2007 ) called color-in-context theory. Like other variables that affect social perception, the theory explains that color also conveys meaning which varies as a function of the context in which the color is perceived. Accordingly, the meanings of colors are learned over time through repeated pairings with a particular experience or message (e.g., red stop light and danger) or with biological tendencies to respond to color in certain contexts. For example, female non-human primates display red on parts of their bodies when nearing ovulation; hence red is associated with lust, fertility, and sexuality (Guéguen and Jacob 2013 ). As a function of these associations between colors and experiences, messages, or biological tendencies, people either display approach responses or avoidance responses but are largely unaware of how color affects them. In this section we review studies that examine the effects of red in relational contexts such as interpersonal attraction. However, there is evidence that red is detrimental in achievement (i.e., academic or hiring) contexts (e.g., Maier et al. 2013 ) and that red signals dominance and affects outcomes in competitive sporting contests (e.g., Feltman and Elliot 2011 ; Hagemann et al. 2008 ).
Recently researchers have used color-in-context theory to study the effects of red dress (shirts, dresses) on impressions related to sexual intent, attractiveness, dominance, and competence. Some of these studies were guided by color-in-context theory. Guéguen ( 2012 ) studied men’s perceptions of women’s sexual intent and attractiveness as a function of shirt color. Male participants viewed a photo of a woman wearing a t-shirt that varied in color. When wearing a red t-shirt as compared to the other colors, the woman was judged to be more attractive and to have greater sexual intent. Pazda et al. ( 2014a , [ b ]) conducted an experiment designed to determine why men perceive women who wear red to be more attractive than those who wear other colors. They argued that red is associated with sexual receptivity due to cultural pairings of red and female sexuality (e.g., red light district, sexy red lingerie). Men participated in an online experiment in which they were exposed to a woman wearing either a red, black, or white dress. When wearing the red dress the woman was rated as more sexually receptive than when wearing either the white or the black dresses. The woman was also rated on attractiveness and by performing a mediation analysis the researchers determined that when wearing the red dress, the ratings of her attractiveness as a function of red were no longer significant; in other words, the reason she was rated as more attractive when wearing the red dress was due to the fact that she was also perceived as more sexually receptive.
Pazda et al. ( 2014a , [ b ]), interested in women’s perceptions of other women as a function of their clothing color, conducted a series of experiments. They reasoned that like men, women would also make the connection between a woman’s red dress and her sexual receptivity and perceive her to be a sexual competitor. In their first experiment they found that women rated the stimulus woman as more sexually receptive when wearing a red dress as compared to when she was wearing a white dress. In a second experiment the woman wearing a red dress was not only rated more sexually receptive, she was also derogated more since ratings of her sexual fidelity were lower when wearing a red dress as compared to a white dress. Finally, in a third experiment the stimulus woman was again rated more sexually receptive; this time when she wore a red shirt as compared to when she wore a green shirt. The authors assessed the likelihood that their respondents would introduce the stimulus person to their boyfriends and the likelihood that they would let their boyfriends spend time with the stimulus person. Participants in the red shirt condition were more likely to keep their boyfriends from interacting with the stimulus person than participants in the green shirt condition. Thus, both men and women indicated women wearing red are sexually receptive.
Also interested in color, Roberts et al. ( 2010 ) were interested in determining whether clothing color affects the wearer of the clothing (e.g., do women act provocatively when wearing red clothing?) or does clothing color affect the perceiver of the person wearing the colored clothing. To answer this question, they devised a complicated series of experiments. In the first study, male and female models (ten of each) were photographed wearing each of six different colors of t-shirts. Undergraduates of the opposite sex rated the photographed models on attractiveness. Both male and female models were rated most attractive when wearing red and black t-shirts. In study two the same photos were used, but the t-shirts were masked by a gray rectangle. Compared to when they wore white t-shirts, male models were judged to be more attractive by both men and women when they wore the red t-shirts, even though the red color was not visible. In the third study the t-shirt colors in the photos were digitally altered, so that images could be compared in which red or white t-shirts were worn with those in which red had been altered to white and white had been altered to red. Male models wearing red were rated more attractive than male models wearing white that had been altered to appear red. Also male models wearing red shirts digitally altered to appear white were rated more attractive than male models actually photographed in white. These effects did not occur for female models. The authors reasoned that if clothing color only affected perceivers, then the results should be the same when a model is photographed in red as well as when the model is photographed in white which is subsequently altered to appear red. Since this did not happen, the authors concluded that clothing color affects both the wearer and the perceiver.
In addition, the effects of red dress on impressions also extend to behaviors. Kayser et al. ( 2010 ) conducted a series of experiments. For experiment one, a female stimulus person was photographed in either a red t-shirt or a green one. Male participants were shown a photo of the woman and given a list of questions from which to choose five to ask her. Because women wearing red are perceived to be more sexually receptive and to have greater sexual intent than when wearing other colors, the researchers expected the men who saw the woman in the red dress to select intimate questions to ask and this is what they found. In a second experiment, the female stimulus person wore either a red or a blue t-shirt. After seeing her picture the male participants were told that they would be interacting with her, where she would be sitting, and that they could place their chairs wherever they wished to sit. The men expecting to interact with the red-shirted woman placed their chairs significantly closer to her chair than when they expected to interact with a blue-shirted woman.
In a field experiment (Guéguen 2012 ), five female confederates wore t-shirts of red or other colors and stood by the side of a road to hitchhike. The t-shirt color did not affect women drivers, but significantly more men stopped to pick up the female confederates when they wore the red t-shirts as compared to all the other colors. In a similar study researchers (Guéguen & Jacob 2013 ) altered the color of a woman’s clothing on an online meeting site so that the woman was shown wearing red or several other colors. The women received significantly more contacts when her clothing had been altered to be red than any of the other t-shirt colors.
Researchers should continue conducting research about the color of dress items using color-in-context theory. One context important to consider in this research stream is the cultural context within which the research is conducted. To begin, other colors in addition to red should be studied for their meanings within and across cultural contexts. Since red is associated with sexual receptivity, red clothing should be investigated in the context of the research on provocative dress. For example, would women wearing red revealing dress be judged more provocative than women wearing the same clothing in different colors? Also researchers interested in girls’ and women’s depictions in the media, could investigate the effects of red dress on perceptions of sexual intent and objectification.
Several researchers studying the social psychology of dress have reviewed the research literature (Davis 1984 ; Lennon and Davis 1989 ) and some have analyzed that research (see Damhorst 1990 ; Hutton 1984 ; Johnson et al. 2008 for reviews). In these reviews, Damhorst and Hutton focused on the effect of dress on person perception or impression formation. Johnson et al., however, focused their analysis on behaviors evoked by dress. An emerging line of research focuses on the effects of dress on the behavior of the wearer (Adam and Galinsky 2012 ; Frank and Galinsky 1988 ; Fredrickson et al. 1998 ; Gino et al. 2010 ; Hebl et al. 2004 ; Kouchaki et al. 2014 ; Martins et al. 2007 ).
Fredrickson et al. ( 1998 ), Hebl et al. ( 2004 ), and Martins et al. ( 2007 ) all used objectification theory to guide experiments about women’s and men’s body image experience. They were interested in the extent to which wearing revealing dress could trigger self-objectification. The theory predicts that self-objectification manifests in performance detriments on a task subsequent to a self-objectifying experience. Frederickson et al. had participants complete a shopping task. They entered a dressing room, tried on either a one piece swimsuit or a bulky sweater, and evaluated the fit in a mirror as they would if buying the garment. Then they completed a math performance test. The women who wore a swimsuit performed more poorly on the math test than women wearing a sweater; no such effects were found for men. A few years later Hebl et al. ( 2004 ) used the same procedure to study ethnic differences in self-objectification. Participants were Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, and Asian American undergraduate men and women. Participants completed the same shopping task and math test. Participants who tried on the swimsuits performed worse on the math test than participants who tried on the sweater and these results held for both men and women of all ethnicities.
Martins et al. ( 2007 ) used the same shopping task as Frederickson et al. ( 1998 ) and Hebl et al. ( 2004 ), but employed a different behavioral measure. Their participants were gay and heterosexual men and the garment they tried on was either Speedo men’s briefs or a turtleneck sweater. After the shopping task the men were given the opportunity to sample and evaluate a snack and the amount eaten was measured. Wearing the Speedo affected eating for the gay men, but not the heterosexual men, such that gay men in the Speedo condition ate significantly less of the snack than gay men in the sweater condition. Taken together these studies demonstrate that a nominal clothing manipulation can have effects on the behavior of the wearer.
In one of the first studies to demonstrate the effects of clothing on the wearer, Frank and Gilovich ( 1988 ) noted that the color black is associated with evil and death in many cultures. They studied the extent to which players wearing black uniforms were judged more evil and aggressive than players wearing uniforms of other colors. They analyzed penalties awarded for aggressive behavior in football and ice hockey players. Players who wore black uniforms received more penalties for their aggressive behavior than those who wore other uniform colors. Since the penalty results could be due to biased refereeing, the authors videotaped a staged football game in which the defensive team wore either black or white uniforms. The same events were depicted in each version of the videotape. Participants watched short videos and rated the plays as more aggressive when the team members wore black as compared to white uniforms. In another part of the study, participants were assigned to wear either black or white uniform shirts. While wearing the shirts they were asked the type of games they would like to play; the black-shirted participants selected more aggressive games than the white-shirted participants. The authors interpreted the results of all the studies to mean that players wearing black are aggressive. Yet, when the level of aggressiveness was held constant in the staged football game, referees still perceived black-uniformed players to be more aggressive than white-uniformed players. The authors concluded that the color of the black uniform affects the wearer and the perceiver. This study’s results are similar to those of the researchers studying red dress who found that the color red is associated with a cultural meaning that affects both the wearer and the perceiver of the red dress (Roberts et al. 2010 ).
In a similar way, Adam and Galinsky ( 2012 ) determined that when clothing has symbolic meaning for the wearer, it also affects the wearer’s behavior. The researchers found that a white lab coat was associated with traits related to attentiveness. Then they conducted an experiment in which one group wore a white lab coat described as a painter’s coat and another group wore the same lab coat which was described as a medical doctor’s lab coat. A third group saw, but did not wear, a lab coat described as a medical doctor’s lab coat. Participants then performed an experimental task that required selective attention. The group that wore the coat described as a medical doctor’s lab coat outperformed both of the other two groups.
Gino et al. ( 2010 ) studied the effects of wearing designer sunglasses that were described either as counterfeit or authentic Chloe sunglasses on one’s own behaviors and perceptions of others. Although counterfeits convey status to others, they also mean that the wearers are pretending to be something they are not (i.e., wealthy enough to purchase authentic sunglasses). Participants who thought they were wearing fake sunglasses cheated significantly more on two experimental tasks than those who thought they were wearing authentic sunglasses. In a second experiment, the researchers showed that participants who believed they were wearing counterfeit sunglasses perceived others’ behaviors as more dishonest, less truthful, and more likely to be unethical than those wearing authentic sunglasses. In a third experiment the researchers showed that the effect for wearing counterfeit sunglasses on one’s own behavior was due to the meaning of inauthenticity attributed to the counterfeit sunglasses. Consistent with Adam and Galinsky ( 2012 ) and Frank and Gilovich (1988), in Gino et al. the effect of dress on one’s own behavior was due to the meaning of the dress cue in a context relevant to the meaning of that dress cue. While none of these three studies articulated a specific theory to guide their research, Adams and Galinsky outlined an enclothed cognition framework, which explained that dress affects wearers due to the symbolic meaning of the dress and the physical experience of wearing that dress item.
To summarize the research on the effects of dress on the behavior of the wearer, each of these studies reported research focused on a dress cue associated with cultural meaning. Some of the researchers had to first determine that meaning. The manipulations were designed so that the meaning of the dress cues was salient for the context of the manipulation. For example, in the objectification studies the revealingness of dress was varied in the context of a dressing room mirror where the revealing nature of the cue would be relevant. So to extend the enclothed cognition framework, we suggest that for dress to affect the wearer, the context of the experimental task needs to be such that the meaning of the dress item is salient.
Future researchers may continue to pursue the effects of dress on the wearer. The extended enclothed cognition framework could be applied to school uniforms. A possible research question could be that if school uniforms are associated with powerlessness among schoolchildren, would wearing school uniforms affect the level of effort children expend to solve homework problems or write papers?
It is interesting that previous researchers who examined the effect of school uniforms on various tasks did not ask children what associations uniforms had for them (e.g., Behling 1994 , 1995 ; Behling and Williams 1991 ). This question is clearly an avenue for renewed research in this area. Another situation to which the extended enclothed cognition framework might be investigated is in the context of professional sports. Since wearing a sweatshirt or cap with a professional team’s logo is associated with being a fan of that team, would people wearing those items evaluate that team’s performance higher than people wearing another team’s logos? Would they provide more excuses for their team than fans not wearing the team’s logos? We encourage researchers to continue to investigate the effects of dress on one’s own behaviors utilizing a range of dress cues (e.g., cosmetics, tattoos, and piercings).
An ongoing area of research within the social psychology of dress is relationships between dress and the self. Although some researchers use the terms identity and self interchangeably, it is our position that they are not the same concepts but are related. We begin our discussion of the self with research on the body.
Whereas the first section of our review focused on body supplements (i.e., the clothed body), this section focuses on body modifications or how the body is altered. Within this discussion, the two research directions that we include are (1) body modifications that carry some risk, as opposed to routine modifications that typically do not, and (2) the influence of body talk and social comparison as variables influencing body image.
Societal standards of attractiveness in the Western world often focus on a thin appearance for women and a mesomorphic but muscular appearance for men (Karazia et al. 2013 ). Internalization of societal standards presented through various media outlets is widely recognized as a primary predictor of body dissatisfaction and risky appearance management behaviors including eating pathology among women (Cafri et al. 2005a , [ b ]), muscle enhancement and disordered eating behaviors in men (Tylka 2011 ), tattooing among young adults (Mun et al. 2012 ), and tanning among adolescents (Prior et al. 2014 ; Yoo & Kim, 2014 ). While there are several other risky appearance management behaviors in the early stages of investigation (e.g., extreme body makeovers, cosmetic procedures on male and female private parts, multiple cosmetic procedures), we isolate just a few behaviors to illustrate the impact of changing standards of attractiveness on widespread appearance management practices in the presentation of self.
Experimental research has demonstrated that exposure to social and cultural norms for appearance (via idealized images) leads to greater dissatisfaction with the body in general for both men and women (Blond 2008 ; Grabe et al. 2008 ); yet a meta-analysis of eight research studies conducted in real life settings suggested that these appearance norms were more rigid, narrowly defined, and prevalent for women than for men (Buote et al. 2011 ). These researchers also noted that women reported frequent exposure to social norms of appearance (i.e., considered bombardment by many women), the norms themselves were unrealistic, yet the nature of the messages was that these norms are perfectly attainable with enough time, money, and effort. Men, on the other hand, indicated that they were exposed to flexible social norms of appearance, and therefore report feeling less pressure to attain a particular standard in presenting their appearance to others (Buote et al. 2011 ).
A recent stream of research related to individuals with eating disorders is concerned with the practice of body checking (i.e., weighing, measuring or otherwise assessing body parts through pinching, sucking in the abdomen, tapping it for flatness). Such checking behaviors may morph into body avoidance (i.e., avoiding looking in mirrors or windows at one’s reflection, avoiding gym locker rooms or situations involving showing the body to others) (White & Warren 2011 ), the manifestation of eating disorders (Haase et al. 2011 ), obsession with one’s weight or body shape, and a critical evaluation of either aspect (Smeets et al. 2011 ). The propensity to engage in body checking appears to be tied to ethnicity as White and Warren found, in their comparison of Caucasian women and women of color (Asian American, African American, and Latin American). They found significant differences in body checking and avoidance behaviors in Caucasian women and Asian American women over African American and Latin American women. Across all the women, White and Warren found positive and significant correlations between body checking and (1) avoidance behaviors and higher body mass index, (2) internalization of a thin ideal appearance, (3) eating disturbances, and (4) other clinical impairments such as debilitating negative thoughts.
Another characteristic of individuals with eating disorders is that they habitually weigh themselves. Self-weighing behaviors and their connection to body modification has been the focus of several researchers. Research teams have documented that self-weighing led to weight loss maintenance (Butryn et al. 2007 ) and prevention of weight gain (Levitsky et al. 2006 ). Other researchers found that self-weighing contributed to risky weight control behaviors such as fasting (Neumark-Sztainer et al. 2006 ) and even to weight gain (Needham et al. 2010 ). Lately, gender differences have also been investigated relative to self-weighing. Klos et al. ( 2012 ) found self-weighing was related to a strong investment in appearance, preoccupation with body shape, and higher weight among women. However, among men self-weighing was related to body satisfaction, investment in health and fitness, and positive evaluation of health.
One interesting departure from weight as a generalized aspect of body concern among women is the examination of wedding-related weight change. Considering the enormous cost of weddings, estimated to average $20,000 in the United States (Wong 2005 ), and the number of wedding magazines, websites, and self-help books on weddings (Villepigue et al. 2005 ), it is not surprising that many brides-to-be want to lose weight for their special occasion. Researchers have shown that an average amount of intended weight loss prior to a wedding is 20 pounds in both the U.S. and Australia with between 12% and 33% of brides-to-be reporting that they had been advised by someone else to lose weight (Prichard & Tiggemann 2009 ). About 50% of brides hoped to achieve weight loss, yet most brides did not actually experience a change in weight (Prichard & Tiggemann, 2014 ); however, when questioned about six months after their weddings, brides indicated that they had gained about four pounds. Those who were told to lose weight by significant others such as friends, family members, or fiancé gained significantly more than those who were not told to do so, suggesting that wedding-related weight change can have repercussions for post wedding body satisfaction and eating behaviors. Regaining weight is typical, given that many people who lose weight regain it with a year or so of losing it.
Researchers have found that body modifications practiced by men are related more to developing muscularity than to striving for a thin body (Cafri et al. 2005a , [ b ]) with particular emphasis placed on developing the upper body areas of chest and biceps (Thompson & Cafri 2007 ). The means to achieve this body modification may include risky behaviors such as excessive exercise and weight training, extreme dieting and dehydration to emphasize musculature, and use of appearance or performance enhancing substances (Hildebrandt et al. 2010 ).
One possible explanation for men’s drive for muscularity may be objectification. While objectification theory was originally proposed to address women’s objectification, it has been extended to men (Hebl et al. 2004 ; Martins et al. 2007 ). These researchers determined that like women, men are objectified in Western and westernized culture and can be induced to self-objectify via revealing clothing manipulations.
Researchers have also examined how men are affected by media imagery that features buff, well-muscled, thin, attractive male bodies as the aesthetic norm. Kolbe and Albanese ( 1996 ) undertook a content analysis of men’s lifestyle magazines and found that most of the advertised male bodies were not “ordinary,” but were strong and hard bodies, or as the authors concluded, objectified and depersonalized. Pope et al. ( 2000 ) found that advertisements for many types of products from cars to underwear utilized male models with body-builder physiques (i.e., exaggerated “6 pack” abdominal muscles, huge chests and shoulders, yet lean); they suggested that men had become focused on muscularity as a cultural symbol of masculinity because they perceived that women were usurping some of their social standing in the workforce. Hellmich ( 2000 ) concurred and suggested that men were overwhelmed with images of half-naked, muscular men and that they too were targets of objectification. Other researchers (e.g., Elliott & Elliott 2005 ; Patterson & England 2000 ) confirmed these findings – that most images in men’s magazines featured mesomorphic, strong, muscular, and hyper-masculine bodies.
How do men respond to such advertising images? Elliott and Elliott ( 2005 ) conducted focus interviews with 40 male college students, ages 18-31, and showed them six different advertisements in lifestyles magazines. They found six distinct types of response, two negative, two neutral, and two positive. Negative responses were (1) homophobic (those who saw the ads as stereotypically homosexual, bordering on pornography), perhaps threatening their own perceived masculinity or (2) gender stereotyping (those who saw the ads as depicting body consciousness or vanity, traits that they considered to be feminine). Neutral responses were (3) legitimizing exploitation as a marketing tool (those who recognized that naked chests or exaggerated body parts were shown and sometimes with no heads, making them less than human, but recognizing that sex sells products), and (4) disassociating oneself from the muscular body ideals shown in the ads (recognizing that the images represented unattainable body types or shapes). Positive responses were (5) admiration of real or attainable “average” male bodies and (6) appreciating some naked advertising images as art, rather than as sexual objects. The researchers concluded that men do see their gender objectified in advertising, resulting in different responses or perceived threats to self.
There is evidence that experiencing these objectified images of the male body is also partially responsible for muscle dysmorphia, a condition in which men become obsessed with achieving muscularity (Leit et al. 2002 ). Understanding contributors to the development of muscle dysmorphia is important as the condition can lead to risky appearance management behaviors such as extreme body-building, eating disorders, and use of anabolic steroids to gain bulk (Bradley et al. 2014 ; Maida & Armstrong 2005 ). In an experiment, Maida and Armstrong exposed 82 undergraduate men to 30 slides of advertisements and then asked them to complete a body image perception test. Men’s body satisfaction was affected by exposure to the images, such that they wanted to be notably more muscular than they were.
Contemporary researchers have found that drive for muscularity is heightened among men when there is a perceived threat to their masculinity such as performance on some task (Steinfeldt et al. 2011 ) or perceiving that they hold some less masculine traits (Blashill, 2011). Conversely, researchers have also suggested that body dissatisfaction and drive for muscularity can be reduced by developing a mindfulness approach to the body characterized by attention to present-moment experiences such as how one might feel during a certain activity like yoga or riding a bicycle (Lavender et al. 2012 ). While the investigation of mindfulness to mitigate negative body image and negative appearance behaviors is relatively new, it is a promising area of investigation.
Tattooing is not necessarily a risky behavior in and of itself, as most tattoo parlors take health precautions with the use of sterile instruments and clean environments. However, research has focused on other risk-taking behaviors that tattooed individuals may engage in, including drinking, smoking, shoplifting, and drug use (Deschesnes et al. 2006 ) as well as and early and risky sexual activity (Koch, Roberts, Armstrong, & Owen, 2007). Tattoos have also been studied as a bodily expression of uniqueness (Mun et al. 2012 ; Tiggemann & Hopkins 2011 ) but not necessarily reflecting a stronger investment in appearance (Tiggemann & Hopkins 2011 ).
Tanning behaviors are strongly associated with skin cancer, just as smoking is associated with lung cancer. In fact, the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization has classified ultraviolet radiation from the sun and tanning devices that emit ultraviolet light as group 1 carcinogens, placing ultraviolet radiation in the same category as tobacco use (World Health Organization, 2012 ). Yet, tanning behaviors are prevalent among many young adults and adolescents causing them to be at increased risk of skin cancer, particularly with indoor tanning devices (Boniol et al. 2012 ; Lostritto et al. 2012 ). Studies of motives for tanning among these populations suggest that greater tanning behavior, for both genders, is correlated with high investment in appearance, media influences, and the influence of friends and significant others (Prior et al. 2014 ). Frequent tanning behaviors in adolescent boys have been related to extreme weight control, substance use, and victimization (Blashill 2013 ). Among young adults, Yoo and Kim ( 2014 ) identified three attitudes toward tanning that were related to tanning behaviors. The attitude that tanning was a pleasurable activity influenced indoor and outdoor tanning behaviors. The attitude that a tan enhances physical attractiveness influenced use of tanning beds and sunless tanning products. The attitude that tanning is a healthy behavior influenced outdoor tanning. They advised that tanning behaviors could be studied further particularly in relation to other risky behaviors.
A relatively recent line of investigation concerns the impact of talk about the body on perceptions of self. One would think that communication among friends would typically strengthen feelings of self-esteem and psychological well-being (Knickmeyer et al. 2002 ). Yet, certain types of communication, such as complaining about one’s body or appearance, may negatively impact feelings about the self (Tucker et al. 2007 ), particularly in the case of “fat talk” or disparaging comments about body size, weight, and fear of becoming fat (Ousley et al. 2008 ; Warren et al. 2012 ). Such fat talk has become normative behavior among women and, according to one study, occurs in over 90% of women (Salk & Engeln-Maddox 2011 ) and, according to another study, occurs in women of all ages and body sizes (Martz et al. 2009 ) because women feel pressure to be self-critical about their bodies. More women than men reported exposure to fat talk in their circle of friends and acquaintances and greater pressure to engage in it (Salk & Engeln-Maddox). Thus, fat talk extends body dissatisfaction into interpersonal relationships (Arroyo & Harwood 2012 ).
Sladek et al. ( 2014 ) reported a series of studies that elaborated on the investigation of body talk among men, concluding that men’s body talk has two distinct aspects, one related to weight and the other to muscularity. After developing a scale that showed strong test-retest reliability among college men, they found that body talk about muscularity was associated with dissatisfaction with the upper body, strong drive for muscularity, symptoms of muscle dysmorphia, and investment in appearance. Body talk about weight was associated with upper body dissatisfaction, symptoms of muscle dysmorphia, and disordered eating attitudes and behaviors. They suggest future research in body talk conversations among men and boys of all ages, from different cultural backgrounds, and in different contexts.
Negative body talk among men appears to be less straightforward than that among women (Engeln et al. 2013 ). These researchers reported that men’s body talk included both positive elements and negative elements, while that of women tended to focus on the negative, perhaps reflecting an accepting body culture among men in which they can praise one another as well as commiserate with other men on issues regarding muscularity and weight. Yet, both muscle talk and fat talk were found to decrease state appearance self-esteem and to increase state body dissatisfaction among men.
While the fat talk literature clearly establishes the normative occurrence of this type of communication, as well as establishes the negative impact on the self, the literature has not delved into theoretical explanations for its existence. Arroyo ( 2014 ) has posited a relationship between fat talk and three body image theories (self-discrepancy, social comparison, and objectification), and suggested that degree of body dissatisfaction could serve as a mediating mechanism. Self-discrepancy theory suggests that the discrepancy between one’s actual self and one’s ideal self on any variable, such as weight or attractiveness, motivates people to try to achieve that ideal (Jacobi & Cash 1994 ). Social comparison theory (Festinger 1954 ) explains that we compare ourselves to others on some variable of comparison. When we compare ourselves to others who we believe to be better than ourselves (upward comparison) on this variable (say, for example, thinner or more attractive), we may feel worse about ourselves and engage in both non-risky and risky behaviors such as extreme weight control to try to meet those expectations (Ridolfi et al. 2011 ; Rudd & Lennon 1994 ). Objectification theory, as mentioned earlier in this paper, states that bodies are treated as objects to be evaluated and perceived by others (Szymanski et al. 2011 ); self-objectification occurs when individuals look upon themselves as objects to be evaluated by others.
Arroyo ( 2014 ) surveyed 201 college women to see what effect weight discrepancy, upward comparison, and objectified body consciousness had on fat talk; a mediating variable of body dissatisfaction was investigated. She found that how satisfied or dissatisfied the women did indeed impact how they felt about each variable. Each of the three predictor variables was positively associated with body dissatisfaction and higher body dissatisfaction predicted fat talk. She concluded that fat talk is more insidious than other social behaviors; it is a type of communication that perpetuates negative perceptions among women as well as the attitude that women should be dissatisfied with their bodies. Future research suggestions included examining the impact of downward social comparisons (in which the individual assumes they fare better than peers on the variables of comparison, such as weight), and examining all three phenomena of self-discrepancy, social comparison, and objectification together to determine their cumulative impact on self-disparaging talk.
Negative body talk or fat talk is related to perceptions about the self and to appearance-management behaviors in presenting the self to others. In a sample of 203 young adult women, negative body talk was related to body dissatisfaction and poor self-esteem, and was associated with stronger investment in appearance, distorted thoughts about the body, disordered eating behavior, and depression (Rudiger & Winstead 2013 ). Positive body talk was related to fewer cognitive distortions of the body, high body satisfaction, high self-esteem, and friendship quality. Another form of body talk, co-rumination or the mutual sharing between friends of negative thoughts and feelings, is thought to intensify the impact of body talk. In this same study, co-rumination was related to frequent cognitive distortions of the body as well as disordered eating behaviors, but to high perceived friendship quality. Thus, negative body talk achieved no positive outcomes, yet co-rumination achieved negative outcomes for the self, but positive outcomes for quality of friendship. Thus, future research could tease apart the specific components of the social phenomenon of co-rumination in relation to self-perceptions and appearance management behaviors.
Shifting attention from relationships between the body and self, we move to a discussion of relationships between dress and that aspect of the self that is concerned with answering questions about who we are as distinct and unique individuals (e.g., what type of person am I?). Earlier we shared research about how wearing certain article of dress might impact one’s own physical behaviors. We shift now to sharing research addressing the role dress might play in thinking about oneself as a unique and distinct individual (i.e., self-perceptions). Researchers addressing this topic have utilized Bem’s ( 1972 ) self-perception theory. Bem proposed that similar to the processes we use in forming inferences about others, we can form inferences about ourselves. Bem argues that people’s understanding of their own traits was, in some circumstances, an assessment of their own behaviors. This process was proposed to be particularly relevant to individuals who were responsive to self-produced cues (i.e., cues that arise from an individual’s own behavior or characteristics).
In the 1980s, Kellerman and Laird ( 1982 ) utilized self-perception theory to see whether wearing a specific item of dress (e.g., eye glasses) would influence peoples’ ratings of their own skills and abilities. They conducted an experiment with undergraduate students having them rate themselves on an array of traits when wearing and when not wearing glasses and to complete a hidden figures test. Although there were no significant differences in their performance on the test, the participants’ ratings of their competence and intelligence was higher when wearing glasses than when not. In related research, Solomon and Schopler ( 1982 ) found that both men and women indicated that the appropriateness of their clothing affected their mood.
Studying dress specifically within a workplace context, in the 1990s Kwon ( 1994 ) did not have her participants actually wear different clothing styles but asked them to project how they might think about themselves if they were to wear appropriate versus inappropriate clothing to work. Participants indicated they would feel more competent and responsible if they wore appropriate rather than inappropriate clothing. Similarly, Rafaeli et al. ( 1997 ) a found that employees indicated a link between self-perception and clothing associating psychological discomfort with wearing inappropriate dress for work and increased social self-confidence with appropriate attire. Nearly ten years later, Adomaitis and Johnson ( 2005 ) in a study of flight attendants found that the attendants linked wearing casual uniforms for work (e.g., t-shirt, shorts) with negative self-perceptions (e.g., nonauthoritative, embarrassment, unconfident, unprofessional). Likewise, Peluchette and Karl ( 2007 ) investigating the impact of formal versus casual attire in the workplace found that their participants viewed themselves as most authoritative, trustworthy, productive and competent when wearing formal business attire but as friendliest when wearing casual or business casual attire. Continuing this line of research with individuals employed in the public sector, Karl et al. ( 2013 ) reported participants indicated they felt more competent and authoritative when in formal business or business casual attire and least creative and friendly when wearing casual dress.
As workplace dress has become casual, it would be useful for researchers to uncover any distinctions in casualness that make individuals feel more or less competent, respected, or authoritative. Another aspect of clothing that could be investigated is fit as it might impact self-perceptions or use of makeup.
Guy and Banim ( 2000 ) were interested in how clothing was used as means of self-presentation in everyday life. They implemented three strategies to meet their research objective of investigating women’s relationships to their clothing: a personal account, a clothing diary, and a wardrobe interview. The personal account was a written or tape recorded response to the question “what clothing means to me.” The clothing diary was a daily log kept for two weeks. The wardrobe interview was centered on participants’ current collection of clothing. Participants were undergraduates and professional women representing several age cohorts. The researchers identified three distinct perspectives of self relative to the women’s clothing. The first was labeled “the woman I want to be”. This category of responses revealed that the women used clothing to formulate positive self-projections. Favorite items of clothing in particular were identified as useful in bridging the gap between “self as you would like it to be” and the image actually achieved with the clothing. The second category of responses was labeled “the woman I fear I could be”. This category of responses reflected experiences where clothing had failed to achieve a desired look or resulted in a negative self-presentation. Concern here was choosing to wear clothing with unintentional effects such as highlighting parts of the body that were unflattering or concern about losing the ability to know how to dress to convey a positive image. The last category, “the woman I am most of the time” contained comments indicating the women had a “relationship with clothes was ongoing and dynamic and that a major source of enjoyment for them was to use clothes to realize different aspects of themselves” (p. 321).
Interested in how the self shaped clothing consumption and use, Ogle et al. ( 2013 ) utilized Guy and Banim’s ( 2000 ) views of self to explore how consumption of maternity dress might shape the self during a liminal life stage (i.e., pregnancy). Interviews with women expecting their first child revealed concerns that available maternity dress limited their ability to express their true selves. Some expressed concern that the maternity clothing that was available to them in the marketplace symbolized someone that they did not want to associate with (i.e., the woman I fear I could be). Several women noted they borrowed or purchased used clothing from a variety of sources for this time in their life. This decision resulted in dissatisfaction because the items were not reflective of their selves and if worn resulted in their projecting a self that they also did not want to be. In addition, the women shared that they used dress to confirm their selves as pregnant and as NOT overweight. While some of the participants did experience a disrupted sense of self during pregnancy, others shared that they were able to locate items of dress that symbolized a self-consistent with “the woman I am most of the time”.
Continuing in this line of research, researchers may want to explore these three aspects of self with others who struggle with self-presentation via dress as a result of a lack of fashionable and trendy clothing in the marketplace. Plus-sized women frequently report that they are ignored by the fashion industry and existing offerings fail to meet their need to be fashionable. A recent article in the Huffington Post (“Plus-sized clothing”, 2013 ) noted that retailers do not typically carry plus sizes perhaps due to the misconception that plus-sized women are not trendy shoppers or the idea that these sizes will not sell well. Thus, it may well be that the relationship between dress and self for plus-sized women is frustrating as they are prevented from being able to make clothing choices indicative of their selves “as they would like them to be”.
While several researchers have confirmed that clothing worn impacts thoughts about the self, Hannover and Kühnen ( 2002 ) were interested in uncovering processes that would explain why clothing could have this effect. They began with examining what role priming might have in explaining how clothing impacts self-perceptions. Using findings from social cognition, they argued that clothing styles might prime specific mental categories about one’s self such that those categories that are most easily accessed in a given situation would be more likely to be applied to oneself than categories of information that are difficult to access. Thus, if clothing can be used to prime specific self-knowledge it should impact self-descriptions such that, a person wearing “casual” clothing (e.g., jeans, sweatshirt) should be more apt to describe him or herself using casual terms (e.g., laid-back, uses slang). The researchers had each participant stand in front of a mirror and indicate whether or not specific traits were descriptive of him or herself when wearing either casual or formal clothing (e.g., business attire). The researchers found that when a participant wore casual clothing he or she rated the casual traits as more valid self-descriptions than the formal traits. The reverse was also true. They concluded that the clothing worn primed specific categories of self-knowledge. However, the researchers did not ask participants to what extent they intentionally considered their own clothing when determining whether or not a trait should be applied to them. Yet, as previously noted, Adam and Galinsky ( 2012 ) demonstrated that clothing impacted a specific behavior (attention) only in circumstances where the clothing was worn and the clothing’s meaning was clear. Thus, researchers could test if clothing serves as an unrecognized priming source and if its impact on impression formation is less intentional than typically assumed.
Another area of research within dress and the self involves experience with others and the establishment of meaning. Questions that these researchers are interested in answering include what is the meaning of an item of dress or a way of appearing? Early researchers working in this area have utilized symbolic interactionism as a framework for their research (Blumer 1969 ; Mead 1934 ; Stone 1962 ). The foundational question of symbolic interaction is: “What common set of symbols and understandings has emerged to give meaning to people’s interactions?” (Patton 2002 , p. 112).
There are three basic premises central to symbolic interactionism (Blumer 1969 ). The first premise is that our behavior toward things (e.g., physical objects, other people) is shaped by the meaning that those things have for us. Applied to dress and appearance, this premise means that our behavior relative to another person is influenced by that person’s dress (Kaiser 1997 ) and the meaning that we assign to that dress. The second premise of symbolic interaction is that the meaning of things is derived from social interaction with others (Blumer). This premise indicates that meanings are not inherent in objects, must be shared between individuals, and that meanings are learned. The third premise is that meanings are modified by a continuous interpretative process in which the actor interacts with himself (Blumer). As applied to clothing, this premise suggests that the wearer of an outfit or item of clothing is active in determining the meaning of an item along with the viewer of that item.
Symbolic interactionism posits that the self is a social construction established, maintained, and altered through interpersonal communication with others. While initial work focused on investigating verbal communication as key to the construction of the self, Stone extended communication to include appearance and maintained that “appearance is at least as important in establishment and maintenance of the self” as verbal communication (1962, p. 87).
Stone ( 1962 ) discussed a process of establishing the self in interaction with others. This process included selecting items of dress to communicate a desired aspect of self (i.e., identity) as well as to convey that desired aspect to others. One stage in this process is an individual’s review of his/her own appearance. This evaluation and response to one’s own appearance is called program. One might experience a program by looking in the mirror to assess whether the intended identity expressed through dress is the one that is actually achieved. After this evaluation of one’s appearance, the next stage involves others reacting to an individual’s appearance. This is called a review. Stone contends that when “programs and reviews coincide, the self of the one who appears is validated or established” (p. 92). However, when programs and reviews do not coincide, the announced identity is challenged and “conduct may be expected to move in the direction of some redefinition of the challenged self” (p. 92).
Researchers using this approach in their investigations of dress have used Stone’s ( 1962 ) ideas and applied the concept of review to the experiences of sorority women. Hunt and Miller ( 1997 ) interviewed sorority members about their experiences with using dress to communicate their membership and how members, via their reviews, shaped their sorority appearances. Members reported using several techniques in the review of the appearance of other members as well as in response to their own appearance (i.e., programs). Thus, the researcher’s results supported Stone’s ideas concerning establishment of an identity (as an aspect of self) as a process of program and review.
In an investigation of the meaning of dress, in this instance the meaning of a specific body modification—a tattoo, Mun et al. ( 2012 ) interviewed women of various ages who had tattoos to assess meanings, changes in self-perceptions as a result of the tattoo, and any changes in the women’s behavior as an outcome of being tattooed. To guide their inquiry, the researchers used Goffman’s ( 1959 ) discussion of the concept of self-presentation from his seminal work The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life . According to Goffman, on a regular basis people make inferences about the motivations that underlie other people’s behaviors. To make these inferences they use everyday details. Because most people make these inferences, Goffman believed that individuals could purposely control the content of those inferences by controlling their behavior. Included in this behavior was an individual’s dress. These researchers found support for Goffman’s reasoning. Participants shared that their tattoo(s) had meaning and were expressive of their selves, their personal values and interests, important life events (e.g., marriage), and religious/sacred beliefs. The meaning of a tattoo was also dynamic for several participants rather than static. Participants’ self-perceptions were impacted as a result of being tattooed with several participants sharing increases to their confidence and to their perceived empowerment. Individuals who shared a change in behavior primarily noted that they controlled the visibility of their tattoos to others as a method to control how others might respond to them having a tattoo especially within the workplace.
Since an array of body modifications (e.g., piercings, gauging, scarification) are being adopted cross-culturally, investigations of people’s experiences with any of these modifications is fertile area for future researchers interested in the meaning(s) of dress and how dress impacts the self through interaction with others. Researchers may want to investigate men’s experiences with piercing/gauging as well as women’s experiences with body building and other developing forms of body modification. Extreme forms of body piercings (e.g., piercings that simulate corset lacings) and underlying motivations for these body modifications would add to our understanding of relationships between dress and self. The meanings of facial hair to men or body hair removal (partial, total) for both men and women are additional aspects of dress that could be investigated.
In the aforementioned research by Ogle et al. ( 2013 ), the researchers found that a primary reason their participants were disappointed by the maternity clothing offered through the marketplace was due to a lack of fit between their selves and the clothing styles made available. Thus, it is clear that ideas about the self impact clothing selection and purchase. Sirgy ( 1982 ) proposed self-image product-image congruity theory to describe the process of how people applied ideas concerning the self to their purchasing. The basic assumption of the theory is that through marketing and branding, products gain associated images. The premise of the theory is that products people are motivated to purchase are products with images that are congruent with or symbolic of how they see themselves (i.e., actual self-image) or with how they would like to be (i.e., ideal self-image). They also will avoid those products that symbolize images that are inconsistent with either of these self-images.
Rhee and Johnson ( 2012 ) found support for the self-image product-image congruity relationship with male and female adolescents. These researchers investigated the adolescents’ purchase and use of clothing brands. Participants indicated their favorite apparel brand was most similar to their actual self (i.e., this brand reflects who I am), followed by their social self (i.e., this brand reflects who I want others to think I am), and their desired self (i.e., this brand reflects who I want to be).
Earlier, Banister and Hogg ( 2004 ) conducted research investigating the idea that consumers will actively reject or avoid products with negative symbolic meanings. The researchers conducted group interviews with adult consumers. Their participants acknowledged that clothing items could symbolize more than one meaning depending on who was interpreting the meaning. They also acknowledged that the consumers they interviewed appeared to be more concerned with avoiding consumption of products with negative symbolic images than with consuming products with the goal of achieving a positive image. One participant noted that while attempts to achieve a positive image via clothing consumption may be sub-conscious, the desire to avoid a negative image when shopping was conscious.
It is clear from our review that interest in the topic of the social psychology of dress is on-going and provides a fruitful area of research that addresses both basic and applied research questions. Although we provided an overview of several key research areas within the topic of the social psychology of dress we were unable to include all of the interesting topics being investigated. There are other important areas of research including relationships between dress and specific social and cultural identities, answering questions about how dress functions within social groups, how we learn to attach meanings to dress, and changing attitudes concerning dress among others. Regardless, we hope that this review inspires both colleagues and students to continue to investigate and document the important influence dress exerts in everyday life.
a These researchers used role theory to frame their investigation.
Abbey A, Cozzarelli C, McLaughlin K, Harnish RJ: The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: do women and men evaluate these cues differently?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1987, 17 (2): 108-126.
Google Scholar
Abramov I: An analysis of personal color analysis. The psychology of fashion: From conception to consumption. Edited by: Solomon M. 1985, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 211-223.
Adam H, Galinsky AD: Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012, 48 (4): 918-925.
Adomaitis A, Johnson KKP: Casual versus formal uniforms: flight attendants' self-perceptions and perceived appraisals by others. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 2005, 23 (2): 88-101.
Arroyo A: Connecting theory to fat talk: body dissatisfaction mediates the relationships between weight discrepancy, upward comparison, body surveillance, and fat talk. Body Image. 2014, 11 (3): 303-306.
Arroyo A, Harwood J: Exploring the causes and consequences of engaging in fat talk. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 2012, 40 (2): 167-187.
Banister E, Hogg M: Negative symbolic consumption and consumers’ drive for self‐esteem: the case of the fashion industry. European Journal of Marketing. 2004, 38 (7): 850-868.
Behling D, Williams EA: Influence of dress on perception of intelligence and expectations of scholastic achievement. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1991, 9 (4): 1-7.
Behling D: School uniforms and person perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1994, 79 (2): 723-729.
Behling D: Influence of dress on perception of intelligence and scholastic achievement in urban schools with minority populations. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1995, 13 (1): 11-16.
Bem D: Self-perception theory. Advances in experimental social psychology. Edited by: Berkowitz L. 1972, Academic, New York, NY, 1-62.
Blashill A: Psychosocial correlates of frequent indoor tanning among adolescent boys. Body Image. 2013, 10 (2): 259-262.
Blond A: Impact of exposure to images of ideal bodies on male body dissatisfaction. Body Image. 2008, 5 (3): 244-250.
Blumer H: Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. 1969, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Boniol M, Autier P, Boyle P, Gandini S: Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal. 2012, 345: 1-12.
Bradley L, Rudd NA, Reilly A, Freson T: A review of men’s body image literature: what we know, and need to know. International Journal of Costume and Fashion. 2014, 14 (1): 29-45.
Buote V, Wilson A, Strahan E, Gazzola S, Papps F: Setting the bar: divergent sociocultural norms for women’s and men’s ideal appearance in real-world contexts. Body Image. 2011, 8 (4): 322-334.
Burns LD, Lennon SJ: The effect of clothing on the use of person information categories in first impressions. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1993, 12 (1): 9-15.
Butryn ML, Phelan S, Hill JO, Wing RR: Consistent self-monitoring of weight: a key component of successful weight loss maintenance. Obesity. 2007, 15 (12): 3091-3096.
Cafri G, Thompson JK, Ricciardelli L, McCabe M, Smolak L, Yesalis C: Pursuit of the muscular ideal: physical and psychological consequences and putative risk factors. Clinical Psychology Review. 2005, 25 (2): 215-139.
Cafri G, Yamamiya Y, Brannick M, Thompson JK: The influence of sociocultural factors on body image: a meta-analytic review. Clinical psychology: Science and practice. 2005, 12 (4): 421-433.
Cahoon DD, Edmonds EM: Estimates of opposite-sex first impressions related to females’ clothing style. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1987, 65 (2): 406-406.
Damhorst ML: Meanings of clothing cues in social context. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1984-85, 3 (2): 39-48.
Damhorst ML: In search of a common thread: classification of information communicated through dress. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1990, 8 (2): 1-12.
Davis LL: Clothing and human behavior: a review. Home Economics Research Journal. 1984, 12: 325-339.
Deschesnes M, Fines P, Demers S: Are tattooing and body piercing indicators of risk-taking behaviors among high school students?. Journal of Adolescence. 2006, 29 (3): 379-393.
Edmonds EM, Cahoon DD: Attitudes concerning crimes related to clothing worn by female victims. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1986, 24 (6): 444-446.
Elliot AJ, Maier MA: Color and psychological functioning. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2007, 16 (5): 250-254.
Elliott R, Elliott C: Idealized images of the male body in advertising: a reader-response exploration. Journal of Marketing Communications. 2005, 11 (2): 3-19.
Engeln R, Sladek M, Waldron H: Body talk among college men: content, correlates, and effects. Body Image. 2013, 10 (3): 300-308.
Feltman R, Elliot AJ: The influence of red on perceptions of relative dominance and threat in a competitive context. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2011, 33 (2): 308-314.
Festinger L: A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. 1954, 7 (2): 117-140.
Francis SK, Evans PK: Effects of hue, value, and style of garment and personal coloring of model on person perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1987, 64: 383-390.
Frank MG, Gilovich T: The dark side of self and social perception: black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988, 54 (1): 74-85.
CAS Google Scholar
Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA: Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1997, 21 (2): 173-206.
Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA, Noll SM, Quinn DM, Twenge JM: That swimsuit becomes you: sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998, 75 (1): 269-
Gino F, Norton MI, Ariely D: The counterfeit self: the deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science. 2010, 21 (5): 712-720.
Goffman E: The presentation of self in everyday life. 1959, Doubleday, New York, NY
Goodin SM, Van Denburg A, Murnen SK, Smolak L: “Putting on” sexiness: a content analysis of the presence of sexualizing characteristics in girls’ clothing. Sex Roles. 2011, 65 (1–2): 1-12.
Grabe S, Ward LM, Hyde JS: The role of the media in body image concerns among women: a meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin. 2008, 134 (3): 460-476.
Graff KA, Murnen SK, Krause AK: Low-cut shirts and high-heeled shoes: increased sexualization across time in magazine depictions of girls. Sex Roles. 2013, 69 (11–12): 571-582.
Graff K, Murnen SK, Smolak L: Too sexualized to be taken seriously? Perceptions of a girl in childlike vs. sexualizing clothing. Sex Roles. 2012, 66 (11–12): 764-775.
Guéguen N: Color and women attractiveness: when red clothed women are perceived to have more intense sexual intent. The Journal of Social Psychology. 2012, 152 (3): 261-265.
Guéguen N, Jacob C: Color and cyber‐attractiveness: red enhances men's attraction to women's internet personal ads. Color Research & Application. 2013, 38 (4): 309-312.
Gurung RA, Chrouser CJ: Predicting objectification: do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter?. Sex Roles. 2007, 57 (1–2): 91-99.
Guy A, Banim M: Personal collections: women’s clothing use and identity. Journal of Gender Studies. 2000, 9 (3): 313-327.
Haase AM, Mountford V, Waller G: Associations between body checking and disordered eating behaviors in nonclinical women. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2011, 44 (5): 465-468.
Hagemann N, Strauss B, Leißing J: When the referee sees red…. Psychological Science. 2008, 19 (8): 769-771.
Hannover B, Kühnen U: “The clothing makes the self” via knowledge activation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2002, 32 (12): 2513-2525.
Harrison K, Fredrickson BL: Women's sports media, self‐objectification, and mental health in black and white adolescent females. Journal of Communication. 2003, 53 (2): 216-232.
Hebl MR, King EB, Lin J: The swimsuit becomes us all: ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to self-objectification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004, 30 (10): 1322-1331.
Hellmich, N. (2000). Body fixation may be missing on health. USA Today, ᅟ , 6d. 19 September.
Hildebrandt T, Alfano L, Langenbucher JW: Body image disturbance in 1000 male appearance and performance enhancing drug users. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2010, 44 (13): 841-846.
Hilliker JAS, Rogers JC: Color analysis in the marketplace. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1988, 6 (3): 26-31.
Holland E, Haslam N: Worth the weight: the objectification of overweight versus thin targets. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2013, 37 (4): 462-468.
Hunt S, Miller K: The discourse of dress and appearance: identity talk and a rhetoric of review. Symbolic Interaction. 1997, 20 (1): 69-82.
Hutton SS: State of the art: clothing as a form of human behavior. Home Economics Research Journal. 1984, 12 (3): 340-353.
Jacobi L, Cash TF: In pursuit of the perfect appearance: discrepancies among self- ideal percepts of multiple physical attributes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1994, 24 (5): 379-396.
Johnson KKP, Lennon SJ: The social psychology of dress. Encyclopedia of world dress and fashion (online). Edited by: Eicher JB. 2014, New York, NY, Berg
Johnson KKP, Workman JE: Clothing and attributions concerning sexual harassment. Home Economics Research Journal. 1992, 21 (2): 160-172.
Johnson KKP, Workman JE: Blaming the victim: attributions concerning sexual harassment based on clothing, just-world belief, and sex of subject. Home Economics Research Journal. 1994, 22 (4): 382-400.
Johnson KKP, Yoo J-J, Kim M, Lennon SJ: Dress and human behavior: a review and critique of published research. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 2008, 26 (3): 3-22.
Kaiser SB: The social psychology of clothing: Symbolic appearances in context. 1997, Fairchild, New York, NY
Karazia B, van Dulmen M, Wong K, Crowther J: Thinking meta-theoretically about the role of internalization in the development of body dissatisfaction and body change behaviors. Body Image. 2013, 10 (4): 433-441.
Karl K, Hall L, Peluchette J: City employee perceptions of the impact of dress and appearance: you are what you wear. Public Personnel Management. 2013, 42 (3): 452-470.
Kayser DN, Elliot AJ, Feltman R: Red and romantic behavior in men viewing women. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2010, 40 (6): 901-908.
Kellerman J, Laird J: The effect of appearance on self-perceptions. Journal of Personality. 1982, 50 (3): 296-315.
Klos L, Esser V, Kessler M: To weigh or not to weigh: the relationship between self-weighing behavior and body image among adults. Body Image. 2012, 9 (4): 551-554.
Koch JR, Roberts AE, Armstrong ML, Owen DC: Frequencies and relations of body piercing and sexual experience in college students. Psychological Reports. 2007, 101 (1): 159-162.
Kouchaki M, Gino F, Jami A: The burden of guilt: Heavy backbacks, light snacks, and enhanced morality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2014, 143 (1): 414-424.
Knickmeyer K, Sexton K, Nishimura N: The impact of same-sex friendships on the well-being of women: a review of the literature. Women & Therapy. 2002, 25 (1): 37-59.
Kolbe RH, Albanese PJ: Man to man: a content analysis of sole male images in male audience magazines. Journal of Advertising. 1996, 24 (4): 1-20.
Kwon Y: The influence of appropriateness of dress and gender on the self-perception of occupational attributes. Clothing and Textile Research Journal. 1994, 12 (3): 33-39.
Lavender J, Gratz K, Anderson D: Mindfulness, body image, and drive for muscularity in men. Body Image. 2012, 9 (2): 289-292.
Leit R, Gray J, Pope H: The media’s representation of the ideal male body: a cause for muscle dysmorphia?. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2002, 31 (3): 334-338.
Lennon SJ, Davis LL: Clothing and human behavior from a social cognitive framework Part I: theoretical perspectives. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1989, 7 (4): 41-48.
Levitsky DA, Garay J, Nussbaum M, Neighbors L, DellaValle DM: Monitoring weight daily blocks the freshman weight gain: a model for combating the epidemic of obesity. International Journal of Obesity. 2006, 30 (6): 1003-1010.
Lewis L, Johnson KKP: Effect of dress, cosmetics, sex of subject, and causal inference on attribution of victim responsibility. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1989, 8 (1): 22-27.
Lostritto K, Ferrucci LM, Carmel B, Leffell DJ, Molinaro AM, Bale AE, Mayne ST: Lifetime history of indoor tanning in young people: a retrospective assessment of initiation, persistence, and correlates. BMC Public Health. 2012, 12: 1-9.
Maida D, Armstrong S: The classification of muscle dysmorphia. International Journal of Men’s Health. 2005, 4 (1): 73-91.
Maier MA, Elliot AJ, Lee B, Lichtenfeld S, Barchfeld P, Pekrun R: The influence of red on impression formation in a job application context. Motivation and Emotion. 2013, 37 (3): 389-401.
Martins Y, Tiggemann M, Kirkbride A: Those Speedos become them: the role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men's body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2007, 33 (5): 634-647.
Martz D, Petroff A, Curtin L, Bassini D: Gender differences in fat talk among American adults: results from the psychology of size survey. Sex Roles. 2009, 61 (1–2): 34-41.
McLeod, SA. (2010). Attribution Theory. Retrieved from ., [ http://www.simplypsychology.org/attribution-theory.html ]
Mead GH: Mind, self and society. 1934, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Mun J, Janigo K, Johnson KKP: Tattoo and self. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 2012, 30 (2): 134-148.
Needham BL, Epel ES, Adler NE, Kiefe C: Trajectories of change in obesity and symptoms of depression: the CARDIA study. American Journal of Public Health. 2010, 100 (6): 1040-1046.
Neumark-Sztainer D, van den Berg P, Hannan PJ, Story M: Self-weighing in adolescents: helpful or harmful? Longitudinal associations with body weight changes and disordered eating. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2006, 39 (6): 811-818.
Ogle J, Tyner K, Schofield-Tomschin S: The role of maternity dress consumption in shaping the self and identity during the liminal transition of pregnancy. Journal of Consumer Culture. 2013, 13 (2): 119-139.
Ousley L, Cordero E, White S: Fat talk among college students: how undergraduates communicate regarding food and body weight, shape and appearance. Eating Disorders. 2008, 16 (1): 73-84.
Patterson M, England G: Body work: Depicting the male body in men’s lifestyle magazines. Proceedings of The Academy of Marketing Annual Conference. 2000, University of Derby, England, Cd-Rom
Patton MQ: Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 2002, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 3
Pazda AD, Elliot AJ, Greitemeyer T: Perceived sexual receptivity and fashionableness: separate paths linking red and black to perceived attractiveness. Color Research & Application. 2014, 39 (2): 208-212.
Pazda AD, Prokop P, Elliot AJ: Red and romantic rivalry: viewing another woman in red increases perceptions of sexual receptivity, derogation, and intentions to mate-guard. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2014, 40 (10): 1260-1269.
Peluchette J, Karl K: The impact of workplace attire on employee self-perceptions. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2007, 18 (3): 345-360.
Plus-sized clothing sold online but not in stores poses problem for shoppers. (2013). Retrieved from ., [ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/21/plus-size-clothing-online_n_3479724.html ]
Pope HG, Phillips K, Olivardia R: The Adonis complex. 2000, Free Press, New York
Prichard I, Tiggemann M: Unveiled: pre-wedding weight concerns and health and beauty plans of Australian brides. Journal of Health Psychology. 2009, 14 (7): 1027-1035.
Prichard IJ, Tiggemann M: Wedding-related weight change: The ups and downs of love. Body Image. 2014, 11 (2): 179-182.
Prior S, Fenwick K, Peterson J: Adolescents’ reasons for tanning and appearance motives: a preliminary study. Body Image. 2014, 11 (1): 93-96.
Radeloff DJ: Psychological types, color attributes, and color preferences of clothing, textiles, and design students. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1991, 9 (3): 59-67.
Rafaeli A, Dutton J, Harquial C, Mackie-Lewis S: Navigating by attire: the use of dress by administrative employees. Academy of Management Journal. 1997, 40: 19-45.
Ridolfi D, Myers T, Crowther J, Ciesla J: Do appearance focused cognitive distortions moderate the relationship between social comparisons to peers and media images and body image disturbance?. Sex Roles. 2011, 65 (7–8): 491-505.
Rhee J, Johnson KKP: Investigating relationships between adolescents’ liking for an apparel brand and brand-self congruency. Young Consumers. 2012, 13 (1): 74-85.
Roach-Higgins ME: A social science of dress, 1947-1966: A personal view. Social science aspects of dress: New directions. Edited by: Lennon SJ, Burns LD. 1993, ITAA, Monument, CO, 2-24.
Roach-Higgins ME, Eicher JB: Dress and identity. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1992, 10 (4): 1-8.
Roberts SC, Owen RC, Havlicek J: Distinguishing between perceiver and wearer effects in clothing color-associated attributions. Evolutionary Psychology: An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior. 2010, 8 (3): 350-364.
Rudd NA: Textiles and clothing in higher education: Strengthening linkages and conceptual identity. Critical linkages in textiles and clothing subject matter: Theory, method, and practice. Edited by: Kaiser SB, Damhorst ML. 1991, International Textile and Apparel Association, Monument, CO, 24-32.
Rudd NA, Lennon SJ: Aesthetics of the body and social identity theory. Aesthetics of textiles and clothing: Advancing multi-disciplinary perspectives. Edited by: DeLong M, Fiore AM. 1994, International Textiles and Apparel Association, Monument, CO, 163-175.
Rudiger J, Winstead B: Body talk and body-related co-rumination: associations with body image, eating attitudes, and psychological adjustment. Body Image. 2013, 10 (4): 462-471.
Salk RH, Engeln-Maddox R: “If you’re fat, then I’m humongous!” Frequency, content, and impact of fat talk among college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2011, 35 (1): 18-28.
Sirgy MJ: Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. Journal of Consumer Research. 1982, 9 (3): 287-300.
Sladek M, Engeln R, Miller S: Development and validation of the Male Body Talk Scale: a psychometric investigation. Body Image. 2014, 11 (3): 233-244.
Smeets E, Tiggemann M, Kemps E: Body checking induces an attentional bias for body-related cues. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 2011, 44 (1): 50-57.
Solomon M, Schopler J: Self-consciousness and clothing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1982, 8: 508-514.
Steinfeldt JA, Gilchrist GA, Halterman AW, Gomory A, Steinfeldt MC: Drive for muscularity and conformity to masculine norms among college football players. Psychology of Men and Masculinity. 2011, 12 (4): 324-338.
Stone GP: Appearance and the self. Human behavior and social processes: An interactionist approach. Edited by: Rose AM. 1962, Houghton Mifflin, New York, 86-118.
Szymanski DM, Moffit LB, Carr ER: Sexual objectification of women: advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist. 2011, 39 (1): 6-38.
The muscular ideal: Psychological, social, and medical perspectives. 2007, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Tiggemann M, Andrew R: Clothes make a difference: the role of self-objectification. Sex Roles. 2012, 66 (9–10): 646-654.
Tiggemann M, Hopkins L: Tattoos and piercings: bodily expressions of uniqueness?. Body Image. 2011, 8 (3): 245-250.
Tucker K, Martz D, Curtin L, Bazzini D: Examining “fat talk”, experimentally in a female dyad: How are women influenced by another woman’s body presentation style?. Body Image. 2007, 4 (2): 157-164.
Tylka T: Refinement of the tripartite influence model for men: dual body image pathways to body change behaviors. Body Image. 2011, 8 (3): 199-207.
Villepigue J, Rivera HA, Allen R: The body sculpting bible for brides: A complete workout to look your best in your wedding dress. 2005, Hatherleigh Press, New York
Warren C, Holland S, Billings B, Parker A: The relationships between fat talk, body dissatisfaction, and drive for thinness: perceived stress as a moderator. Body Image. 2012, 9 (3): 358-364.
White E, Warren C: Body checking and avoidance in ethnically diverse female college students. Body Image. 2011, 10 (4): 583-590.
Wong C: Ka-ching? Wedding price tag nears $30k. 2005
Workman JE, Freeburg EW: An examination of date rape, victim dress, and perceiver variables within the context of attribution theory. Sex Roles. 1999, 41 (3–4): 261-277.
Workman JE, Johnson KKP: The role of cosmetics in attributions about sexual harassment. Sex Roles. 1991, 24 (11–12): 759-769.
Workman J, Orr RL: Clothing, sex of subject, and rape myth acceptance as factors affecting attributions about an incident of acquaintance rape. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1996, 14 (4): 276-284.
International Agency for Research on Cancer monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. IARC Monographs. 2012
Yoo J, Kim H: Perceived negative health effect of tanning: the interface between tanning attitudes and behaviors. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 2014, 32 (1): 6-19.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
University of Minnesota, 240 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford Ave, St Paul, MN, USA
Kim Johnson
Indiana University, 1021 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, 47405, IN, USA
Sharron J Lennon
The Ohio State University, 2330 Hartsdale Dr, Powell, 43065-9213, OH, USA
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Kim Johnson .
Competing interests.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
KJ, SL, and NR drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Johnson, K., Lennon, S.J. & Rudd, N. Dress, body and self: research in the social psychology of dress. Fashion and Textiles 1 , 20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-014-0020-7
Download citation
Received : 01 October 2014
Accepted : 28 October 2014
Published : 22 November 2014
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-014-0020-7
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Table of contents
Fashion is a dynamic and ever-evolving field, blending creativity, culture, and commerce uniquely and captivating. It is an expression of personal style and a mirror reflecting societal changes, technological advancements, and varying aesthetic preferences across different eras and regions. Delving into fashion research opens a world of exploration, from the dazzling allure of high fashion and iconic designers to the critical issues of sustainability and ethical production practices.
This paper aims to provide a comprehensive list of fashion research topics, encompassing this complex industry’s diverse and vibrant aspects. It also covers a wide range of subjects, from the impact of cultural shifts on fashion trends to the evolving landscape of fashion marketing and retail. These topics offer a rich terrain for in-depth study and analysis.
Choosing the right research topics about fashion is a critical step that sets the tone for your entire study. It’s a delicate balance of aligning personal interest with academic value.
This approach guarantees a more manageable research process and enhances the potential for meaningful and engaging contributions to the field of fashion studies.
Need help with research paper? Get your paper written by a professional writer Get Help Reviews.io 4.9/5
Dive into the fascinating world of fashion with these compelling research topics. Covering everything from the glitz of designer brands to the pressing issues of sustainability, each topic offers a unique perspective on the multifaceted fashion industry.
Just fill out the form, press the button, and have no worries!
We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.
Fashion market research provides business owners and entrepreneurs with valuable insights so they can make confident, informed decisions to guide the development or evolution of their fashion business.
Valued at an impressive 1.5 trillion U.S. dollars in 2020 , the global fashion/apparel industry is a behemoth industry covering a wide variety of garments and accessories.
While this sector has traditionally experienced consistent growth, the past year has been turbulent and challenging. Whether you are considering a new fashion venture or are looking for innovative ways to recover from an unprecedented year, market research is an effective way to guide your efforts.
This article covers how to conduct a combination of primary and secondary research o to power your fashion market research campaign.
Fashion market research is the process of gathering and analyzing information to gain insights into the fashion industry, which includes its top players, your competitors and mainly, your target market. Whether you own an existing apparel business or are considering an entry into the world of fashion, market research can ensure effective use of your marketing expenditure and increase the likelihood of business success.
Fashion market research is used to achieve the following:
Undertaking a market research campaign project can provide you with the confidence you need to succeed in a highly competitive industry. The end-goal of fashion market research is to gain sufficient information to make informed decisions about your business so that it can thrive.
Fashion market research is made up of two sources of information, referred to as primary and secondary research. By using both primary and secondary sources of information, you can determine several key factors about your target market and its various segments. These include:
To reap the most insights, you should plan to incorporate both primary and secondary sources to drive your fashion market research towards success.
Primary market research refers to the unique data that is gathered from first-hand sources. While it is more labor-intensive to gather primary information, you are rewarded with data that is particularly relevant to your particular business and customer base. It also puts you in control in terms of the data you collect and then leverage.
The most valuable sources of primary information for fashion market research are:
Secondary research is performed by sourcing data from existing, published sources, i.e., data that you don’t need to amass yourself, as it has already been conducted. You should then parse through and organize the secondary data to prepare it for analysis. A strong analysis involves comparing the secondary resources against each other, along with their primary source counterparts.
Good sources of secondary information for the fashion industry include:
To give your fashion market research a jumpstart, we have gathered some of the most relevant sources of secondary information for the fashion industry.
Fashion businesses have more challenges to consider than ever before. If your business is struggling to recover from the global pandemic, market research can help you identify new areas of growth. With a tightened budget, market research is vital to ensure your marketing and advertising spend is used wisely.
Or perhaps you are looking to evolve your business in response to the concerns of “woke” consumers , who demand a higher level of environment and social responsibility from fashion brands. Market research can help you meet these demands and shape your targeted messaging.
Even without new challenges, every fashion business fights the constant battle to remain relevant and stylish in an ever-changing landscape. Consumers on the hunt for something unique and new will continue to push fashion brands to evolve their style to satisfy their customers’ demands.
Fortunately, this demand comes with more direct access to your customers via social media. You can benefit from an engaged audience by regularly deploying online surveys to gather insights about their needs and desires, no matter how often they change.
Regardless of your motivations, fashion market research can provide you with valuable insights to help you make confident decisions in the months and years to come.
What is fashion market research.
Fashion market research involves collecting and analyzing data in order to gain a better understanding of how an apparel business is positioned in the competitive landscape.
Fashion market research is beneficial for a wide variety of businesses that operate within the fashion industry. This includes established brands, fashion startups, brick-and-mortar stores, apparel chains, and artisan fashion producers.
Fashion market research can help a business identify new target markets, understand how existing customers feel about their brand, gain insights into fashion spending, and explore how marketing campaigns can affect buying behavior.
After identifying the goals of the fashion market research project, the team will conduct primary and secondary research to gather information from the appropriate sources. Then, this information will be compiled into a report that contains findings and recommendations.
The most useful types of primary research for the fashion industry include surveys, interviews, focus groups, field research, mall intercepts, and user testing.
Do you want to distribute your survey? Pollfish offers you access to millions of targeted consumers to get survey responses from $0.95 per complete. Launch your survey today.
Privacy preferences.
28 Accesses
Explore all metrics
To reduce environmental pollution and resource waste in manufacturing, it is important to discuss the increase in consumers' willingness to buy sustainable clothing and their satisfaction with it, as well as ideas on product design optimization and marketing strategies of environmental protection clothing enterprises as well as business and logistics operations. The approach used in this study to obtain the overall rank of criteria is a combination of the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory based on ANP (DANP). Using Muji brand clothing as the empirical research object, this paper seeks to investigate the important factors and consumer preferences in purchasing sustainable clothing. We collected 140 criterion-importance questionnaires and 161 IPA questionnaires. Through literature review and the Delphi method, this study provides an important criterion framework for sustainable clothing, and it used the DEMATEL-based Analytical Network Process (ANP) method to determine the causal relationships among the purchasing factors of sustainable clothing and the importance ranking of these factors. According to the findings, the criterion of "sustainable material" is the most important factor in consumers' decisions to purchase sustainable clothing, and the "environmental protection brand image" and "value expression" are key factors that should be optimized. The evaluation model can be widely used in clothing design, marketing, questionnaire making, evaluation indicators, enterprise development, business operations, and other fields. Such a study has strong implications for industry 4.0 research in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
Abdul-Muhmin AG (2007) Explaining consumers’ willingness to be environmentally friendly. Int J Consum Stud 31(3):237–247
Article Google Scholar
Adelson B (2010) The emotional design of everyday things: The 2006 Benjamin Franklin Medal in computer and cognitive science presented to Donald A Norman. J Frank Inst 347(4):681–687
Aftab M, Rusli HA (2017) Designing visceral, behavioural and reflective products. Chin J Mech Eng 30(5):1058–1068
Bhardwaj AK, Garg A, Ram S, Gajpal Y, Zheng C (2020) Research trends in green product for environment: a bibliometric perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(22):8469
Bray J, Johns N, Kilburn D (2011) An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. J Bus Ethics 98(4):597–608
Burcikova M (2021) Mundane durability: the everyday practice of allowing clothes to last. PLATE: Product Lifetimes and the Environment, pp 1–7
Butler SL, Francis SK (1984) Disseminating energy efficient clothing information: A comparison of two methods. Cloth Text Res J 3(1):9–13
Chan TY, Wong CW (2012) The consumption side of sustainable fashion supply chain: Understanding fashion consumer eco-fashion consumption decision. JFMM 16(2):193–215
Chen YS (2010) The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. J Bus Ethics 93(2):307–319
Chen HL, Burns LD (2006) Environmental analysis of textile products. Cloth Text Res J 24(3):248–261
Chen HM, Wu CH, Tsai SB, Yu J, Wang J, Zheng Y (2016) Exploring key factors in online shopping with a hybrid model. Springer plus 5(1):1–19
Chen YS, Chang TW, Li HX, Chen YR (2020) The influence of green brand affect on green purchase intentions: The mediation effects of green brand associations and green brand attitude. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(11):4089
Connell KYH, Kozar JM (2014) Environmentally sustainable clothing consumption: knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Roadmap to sustainable textiles and clothing. Springer, Singapore, pp 41–61
Chapter Google Scholar
Feng Y, Hong Z, Tian G, Li Z, Tan J, Hu H (2018) Environmentally friendly MCDM of reliability-based product optimisation combining DEMATEL-based ANP, interval uncertainty and Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). Inf Sci 442:128–144
Fung E, Liu R (2019) Sustainable sports fashion and consumption. consumer behaviour and sustainable fashion consumption. Springer, Singapore, pp 39–67
Goworek H, Fisher T, Cooper T, Woodward S, Hiller A (2012) The sustainable clothing market: an evaluation of potential strategies for UK retailers. IJRDM 40(12):935–955
Gwilt A (2011) Producing sustainable fashion: the points for positive intervention by the fashion designer. Shaping sustainable fashion: changing the way we make and use clothes. Earthscan, Londres
Google Scholar
Harris F, Roby H, Dibb S (2016) Sustainable clothing: challenges, barriers and interventions for encouraging more sustainable consumer behaviour. Int J Consum Stud 40(3):309–318
Have you paid attention to the safety and sustainability of clothes? (2020) Retrieved September 1, 2021. Available online: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_184971aef0102yy7g.html
Holkar CR, Jadhav AJ, Pinjari DV, Mahamuni NM, Pandit AB (2016) A critical review on textile wastewater treatments: possible approaches. J Environ Manage 182:351–366
Hou Y (2020) Research on the application of emotional design in cultural creative product design. n E3S Web of Conferences, vol 179. E3S Web of Conferences, p 02119
Jacobs K, Petersen L, Hörisch J, Battenfeld D (2018) Green thinking but thoughtless buying? An empirical extension of the value-attitude-behaviour hierarchy in sustainable clothing. J Clean Prod 203:1155–1169
Jung HJ, Choi YJ, Oh KW (2020) Influencing factors of Chinese consumers’ purchase intention to sustainable apparel products: Exploring consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap. Sustainability 12(5):1770
Kang J, Liu C, Kim SH (2013) Environmentally sustainable textile and apparel consumption: the role of consumer knowledge, perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived personal relevance. Int J Consum Stud 37(4):442–452
Le T, Senaratne H, McQuaid M, Tigwell GW (2021) Exploring a multifaceted framework to support the design of mobile apps for self-regulating anxiety. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp 1–7
Liu M, Lv J, Shichang Du, Deng Y, Shen X, Zhou Y (2024a) Multi-resource constrained flexible job shop scheduling problem with fixture-pallet combinatorial optimisation. Comput Ind Eng 188:109903
Liu C, Chen B, Shao W, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Wong K (2024b) Unraveling attacks in machine learning-based iot ecosystems: a survey and the open libraries behind them. IEEE Internet of Things Journal. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3377730
Majumdar A, Sinha SK, Govindan K (2021) Prioritising risk mitigation strategies for environmentally sustainable clothing supply chains: Insights from selected organisational theories. Sustain Prod Consum 28:543–555
Molkenthin ME (2012) “It’s so me!” using value-expressive and socially-adjusted attitude functions to predict counterfeit purchase intention. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1866
Moon KKL, Youn C, Chang JM, Yeung AWH (2013) Product design scenarios for energy saving: A case study of fashion apparel. Int J Prod Econ 146(2):392–401
Mostafa MM (2007) A hierarchical analysis of the green consciousness of the Egyptian consumer. Psychol Mark 24(5):445–473
Muji (Japanese grocery brand) (n.d.) Retrieved September 3, 2021. Available online: https://www.sohu.com/a/259632101_612990
Muji (2021) What is Muji? https://www.Muji.com.cn/cn/about/
Nishikawa H, Schreier M, Ogawa S (2013) User-generated versus designer-generated products: A performance assessment at Muji. Int J Res Mark 30(2):160–167
Norman DA (2007) Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Civitas Books. ISBN: 0465051359
Pengnate SF, Sarathy R (2017) An experimental investigation of the influence of website emotional design features on trust in unfamiliar online vendors. Comput Hum Behav 67:49–60
Poppi FI, Urios-Aparisi E (2021) Erga omnes: Metaphors and consumerist ideology. The journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, pp 158–189
Rahbar E, Wahid NA (2011) Investigation of green marketing tools’ effect on consumers’ purchase behavior. Business Strategy Series 12(2):73–83
Rahman O, Koszewska M (2020) A study of consumer choice between sustainable and non-sustainable apparel cues in Poland. JFMM 24(2):213–234
Rahman O, Fung BC, Chen Z, Gao X (2017) A cross-national study of apparel consumer preferences and the role of product-evaluative cues. APJML 29(4):796–812
Rausch TM, Kopplin CS (2021) Bridge the gap: Consumers’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing. J Clean Prod 278:123882
Roberts JA (1996) Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising. J Bus Res 36(3):217–231
Saricam C, Okur N (2019) Analysing the consumer behavior regarding sustainable fashion using theory of planned behavior. Consumer Behaviour and Sustainable Fashion Consumption. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–37
Sharp H, Rogers Y, Preece J (2019) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction wiley. Trenton, NJ. https://www.google.com.tw/books/edition/Interaction_Design/UDeQDwAAQBAJ?hl=zh-CN&gbpv=1
Su J, Watchravesringkan KT, Zhou J, Gil M (2019) Sustainable clothing: perspectives from US and Chinese young Millennials. IJRDM 1(2):23
This is a fashion summit leading the new trend of 2018. You must understand it. (2018) Retrieved September 1, 2021. Available online: https://www.sohu.com/a/259632101_612990
Thomas S (2017) Fashion ethics. Routledge
Book Google Scholar
Tomislav K (2018) The concept of sustainable development: From its beginning to the contemporary issues. Zagreb Int Rev Econ Bus 21(1):67–94
Vezzoli C (1998) Clothing care in the sustainable household. In 7th GIN Conference. Rome
Wang L, Wang H, Wu J (2020) Which factors drive firms’ green information technology practices? —an Integrated DEMATEL–ANP Approach. In International Academic Conference on Frontiers in Social Sciences and Management Innovation (IAFSM 2019). Atlantis Press, pp 201–206
Wang Y (2020) Research on fashion design method and application based on the concept of sustainable development. Wuhan Textile University, 6–7
Wong KKL (2010) A geometrical perspective for the bargaining problem. PLoS ONE 5(4):e10331
Wong KKL (2015) Bridging game theory and the knapsack problem: a theoretical formulation. J Eng Math 91(1):177–192
Wong KKL (ed) (2023) Cybernetical intelligence: engineering cybernetics with machine intelligence. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey ISBN: 9781394217489
Xiong ML, Chen YF (2018) Discussion on the strategy of sustainable design of garments—taking patagonia as an example. DEStech Trans Comp Sci Eng, pp 12–24. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtcse/CCNT2018/24773
Yang YPO, Shieh HM, Leu JD, Tzeng GH (2008) A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research 5(3):160–168
Yu N, Huang YT (2020) Important factors affecting user experience design and satisfaction of a mobile health app—a case study of daily yoga app. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(19):6967
Zhou Y, Du S, Liu M, Shen X (2024) Machine-fixture-pallet resources constrained flexible job shop scheduling considering loading and unloading times under pallet automation system. J Manuf Syst 73:143–158
Zhu X, Wei Y, Lu Y, Zhao M, Yang K, Wu S, Zhang H, Wong KKL (2020) Comparative analysis of active contour and convolutional neural network in rapid left-ventricle volume quantification using echocardiographic imaging. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 199:105914
Zou J, Zou Y (2020) Research on marketing strategies of multinational enterprises: taking muji as an example. In 4th International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2020). Atlantis Press, pp 1554–1558
Download references
The authors received no specific funding for this study.
Authors and affiliations.
Xiamen Academy of Arts and Design, Fuzhou University, Xiamen, 361021, China
Wanni Xu, Lu Wang & Minghua Guan
College of Industrial Management, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou, 362000, China
Qingbin Zhuang
College of Fine Arts and Design, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, 325006, China
College of Textile and Apparel, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou, 362000, China
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou, 362000, China
Jianlong Huang
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Conceptualization, Wanni Xu, Minghua Guan, Na Yu and QingBin Zhuang; Investigation, QingBin Zhuang, ZhiBo Tian and Jianlong Huang; Methodology, Wanni Xu, Lu Wang and Na Yu; Project administration, Minghua Guan and QingBin Zhuang; Visualization, Wanni Xu, Na Yu and QingBin Zhuang; Writing-original draft, ZhiBo Tian, Lu Wang, Jianlong Huang and Na Yu; Writing-review & editing, Wanni Xu, Na Yu and Minghua Guan.
Correspondence to Na Yu or Minghua Guan .
Conflicts of interest.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Muji clothing samples
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions
Xu, W., Wang, L., Zhuang, Q. et al. Management of products in the apparel manufacturing industry using DEMATEL-based analytical network process technique. Oper Manag Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-024-00500-5
Download citation
Received : 08 August 2022
Revised : 25 March 2024
Accepted : 31 May 2024
Published : 19 June 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-024-00500-5
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Introduction.
Have a question? Need assistance? Use our online form to ask a librarian for help.
Author: Ellen Terrell, Business Librarian, Science & Business Reading Room
Created: 2012
Last Updated: November 2023
Get connected to the Library’s large and diverse collections related to science, technology, and business through our Inside Adams Blog. This blog also features upcoming events and collection displays, classes and orientations, new research guides, and more.
This guide represents a selection of the many resources in the Library of Congress that may be useful for the study of the business aspects of fashion (or FTAR for fiber, textile, apparel, and retail). It includes all aspects of fashion - clothes, shoes, bags, accessories. It also includes suggested subject headings which interested researchers may select to link directly to our online catalog in order to search for additional materials on this topic.
Also, since keeping up with the fast pace of change is an ongoing process in the "here today, gone tomorrow" fashion industry, we have have included a number of related external resources. Using traditional trade literature and web portals, as well as reports from research groups is essential as a way to find the more general articles and reports but it may be even more important to find reports and articles that look at a particular segment, niche market, situation, or trend so we have included a few links to various web sites that may also be of interest.
Part of the Science & Business Reading Room at the Library of Congress, the Business Section is the starting point for conducting research at the Library of Congress in the subject areas of business and economics. Here, reference specialists in specific subject areas of business assist patrons in formulating search strategies and gaining access to the information and materials contained in the Library's rich collections of business and economics materials.
Verify originality of an essay
Get ideas for your paper
Find top study documents
Updated 19 Jun 2024
Fashion research paper topics are sometimes hard to develop, as this subject is a popular context that changes rapidly. Still, we are all surrounded by trends in our daily lives – we always wear clothes that express our unique sense of style, so there is actually a lot to write about here.
Trends are not stable, so to keep up with the latest mode, it's better to know the background and appeal to tendencies that have taken place previously. Choosing the right topic is essential, as it will help define the angle of developing your ideas and demonstrate your skills in analytical thinking and a creative approach.
Topics about fashion are not limited to discussing clothes only. This subject is also about music, movies, art, and makeup. Those tendencies that were popular in the particular period affect the style and culture of the entire generations, so every topic on the subject has the potential to become something more than simply about trends. Continue reading to learn tips on choosing the most engaging fashion essay topics, before you pay someone to write my paper .
Here are our topic recommendations of how to choose the topic that will be appealing for you:
To help you choose some nice options for your research, we’ve composed a list of 110 paper topic ideas dedicated to style for you to get inspired. College students who are into fashion and want to analyze some of the newest trends will have no trouble finding a compelling topic to write about from the list below. Feel free to modify those you find the most suitable to make them more precise and personalized.
We’ve made sure that all topics from the list you’ll find below are relevant for those who have connected majors. The ideas we share are either somehow connected to present trends or serve as an analysis of stylistical ideas from the past. Those old ones are essential for understanding modern culture as well, as they can change our modern-day perceptions and views. Besides, all trends have a tendency to reappear from time to time due to the fact fashion is cyclical.
A student who starts writing on the task is expected to have an academic approach in developing the topic and rely on historical facts and information worthy of inclusion in the research paper. Prior writing, we recommend analyzing recent trends in clothes and connecting them to history, business, science, or art. This step will help to choose some relevant research paper topics on fashion.
Guaranteed Turnitin success ✌️
Want to write a research paper on the subject but lack the proper title? Here’s a list of creative fashion research topics for you to get inspired.
This extensive list of fashion research paper topics, divided into eight categories, offers a wide range of subjects for exploration, from historical and cultural perspectives to sustainability and globalization. Each category provides a unique lens through which to examine the multifaceted world of fashion, encouraging in-depth research and critical analysis.
Thanks for your feedback.
David is one of those experienced content creators from the United Kingdom who has a high interest in social issues, culture, and entrepreneurship. He always says that reading, blogging, and staying aware of what happens in the world is what makes a person responsible. He likes to learn and share what he knows by making things inspiring and creative enough even for those students who dislike reading.
Complete list of 200+ exciting history research paper topics.
Table of contents Which Research Topic is Considered Good Unique History Research Topics Tips Ancient History Research Topics Middl...
Marketing is a very broad field. Today, it even encompasses the field of digital marketing and all of its sub-branches such as content and social m...
Med Research Topics: What Makes a Good One? Several essential attributes characterize an excellent medical research topic. First and foremost, i...
Gain end-to-end visibility and insights like never before..
Create exceptional digital experiences built on deep network observability and critical network monitoring.
Drive additional sales revenue.
See more revenue from portal fees and capacity purchases when you give customers deeper visibility and transparency with Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance.
Boost efficiency and revenue with Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance (formerly Accedian Skylight), delivering service assurance that continuously monitors and optimizes digital experiences.
Gain a single view of granular performance metrics and third-party data to accelerate MTTR.
Find transient issues with precise synthetic network and service testing.
Premium, SLA-backed services and end-customer portals are just a click away.
Be proactive, not reactive. Put the power of your multivendor infrastructure to work for a trouble-free network.
Granular, real-time visibility.
Perform end-to-end and full mesh testing with microsecond precision and make hidden microbursts a thing of the past.
Enjoy 99.997% uptime and take full control over network performance for greater reliability.
Automatically correlate sensor metrics with third-party sources of performance data to improve ROI and create better digital experiences.
Ready-made customer portals differentiate services, boost revenue, and enhance satisfaction.
See how Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance enables efficient troubleshooting and SLA assurance—all while lowering operational costs.
Solve the challenges of fragmented multidomain tools and poor visibility on service quality. Discover how Provider Connectivity Assurance can help you simplify operations.
Real-time SLA visibility
Monitor and police SLAs for accountability, while proactively addressing performance issues.
Critical network monitoring
Improve operational efficiency with proactive assurance and microsecond visibility for faster issue resolution and better experiences.
B2B service differentiation
Create new revenue opportunities to upsell and differentiate your services with multitenant end-customer portals for real-time service-level agreement (SLA) visibility and alerting.
Automated assurance
Detect issues early when you automate assurance for the entire service lifecycle with real-time service visibility and predictive analytics.
Multilayer assurance
Get a single view of performance across multiple network layers, like segment routing and routed optical networking, to reduce tools and drive down MTTR.
Mobile backhaul and edge monitoring
Optimize digital experiences with real-time service visibility, while assuring your end-to-end 5G transport.
Ai-enabled predictive analytics.
Get an ML-assisted view of your entire network and gain powerful performance insights.
Network-wide service performance visibility. Deployable anywhere, at scale.
"we can look at network performance at any level.".
With Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, Bouygues Telecom now has a complete "telescopic and microscopic" view of network and service performance in a single tool.
André Ethier, Network Quality Engineer
Bouygues Telecom
This is extremely powerful in terms of customer experience. It helps to avoid tickets, as customers can see for themselves what happened with their service. This reduces tension and increases customer satisfaction.
Bart Janssens, Senior Specialist, Packet Architecture
"With service-centric assurance and granular visibility we can prevent degradations, automate actions for improvements, and better communicate with our customers."
Mahesh Anjan, Senior Product Technology Executive
Cisco crosswork network automation.
Drive network efficiency and enhance experiences.
Plug innovation into your network.
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance helps you improve service quality, lower costs, and deliver outstanding user experiences with a single view of service performance across the entire network
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Notably, the fashion industry annually requires 79 billion cubic meters of water (about 20% of the world's total water consumption), ... Limitations and future research directions. This paper primarily investigated sustainable fashion within the EU context. Thus, future research could expand the analysis to other countries to highlight ...
Clothing and Textiles Research Journal (CTRJ), peer-reviewed and published quarterly, strives to strengthen the research base in clothing and textiles, facilitate scholarly interchange, demonstrate the interdisciplinary nature of the field, and inspire further research. It is the official publication of the International Textile & Apparel Association, Inc. View full journal description
The fashion industry is the second-most polluting industry in the world. 1-3 This is the main reason why it has to be transformed into a more sustainable one. Fashion sustainability is a complex issue 4 that covers three equivalently important aspects: environmental, social, and economic. 3-9 The environmental aspect considers the creation of ecological value and resource saving.
Due to their affordable nature, fast fashion items last much shorter and wear out quicker than conventional clothing and accessories, impacting their recyclability. 16,17 Consequently, the fast fashion industry has produced a considerable amount of postconsumer textile waste, challenging the conventional waste management system. 18,19 According to McQueen et al., 20 only about 15% of textile ...
From the systematic literature review, a classification of the digital fashion field in three categories was reached (. Figure 1. ): (i) Communication and Marketing - C&M, which resulted in the highest number of items (255 items), followed by (ii) Design and Production - D&P (155 items), and (iii) Culture and Society - C&S (81 items).
Abstract. Fashion is a growing industry, but the demand for cheap, fast fashion has a high environmental footprint. Some brands lead the way by innovating to reduce waste, improve recycling, and encourage upcycling. But if we are to make fashion more sustainable, consumers and industry must work together. Fashion is a growing industry, but the ...
Ten per cent of the world's carbon emissions come from the fashion industry, which also drains a lot of water from the ground and pollutes waterways (Network, 2021). The issue of sustainability is ...
Textile, apparel, and fashion (TAF) industries contribute significantly to global environmental pollution at every point of the supply chain. Clothing manufacturing and transportation produce a large volume of waste and high greenhouse gas emissions, often taking advantage of cheap labor in developing countries. As a result, stakeholders are becoming more aware of the effect of the textile ...
The fashion industry often falls short of sustainability goals, but contemporary technological advancements offer a wide range of tools to address this issue. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a particularly promising ally in promoting sustainability in fashion. This literature review explores how AI can contribute to the fashion industry's sustainability, highlighting its ...
The global clothing industry is feeling the effects of the COVID-19 European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online)
The significant increase in research papers regarding "fashion design" in 2016 and 2017 is that around 2016, and the fashion industry has been impacted by technological developments. Moreover, the way in which design and clothing made has incorporated considerable technological tools (e.g., 3D printing and wearable technology).
The rise of fast fashion has fueled a surge in garment production, leading to an increase in textile waste. The paper encourages companies to find new ways to generate revenue without producing ...
Introduction. The fashion industry dates back to over a hundred thousand years, right from the availability and use of textiles by mankind (Botti, 2019).The industry, over time, has added economic and material value to humanity, evolving with society, making it a very relevant aspect of human life and also a common area of research, particularly in this technology-driven world (Bruce and Daly ...
Impact of the Fashion Industry by Alejandra M. Navarro Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on May 2021 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering . Abstract . The fashion industry is a large global sector. Cultivation, manufacturing, and distribution is spread
The fashion and apparel (FA) industry faces a critical challenge in the form of deadstock. There are various causes for deadstock, and some may be traced to supply chain and inventory management inefficiency. This research paper aims to understand the issue of deadstock, its root causes, its implications for business and strategies to mitigate it. This paper also aims to investigate the ...
The purpose of this research was to provide a critical review of key research areas within the social psychology of dress. The review addresses published research in two broad areas: (1) dress as a stimulus and its influence on (a) attributions by others, attributions about self, and on one's behavior and (2) relationships between dress, the body, and the self.
As artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as an important frontier of technological innovation (Hager, Bryant, Horvitz, Mataric, & Honavar, 2017), it has also begun to be used as a new application in the fashion industry (Amazon Fashion, 2017; Wong & Liu, 2018).Because AI can deliver significant improvements in speed, cost, and flexibility across the fashion supply chain, it is critical to ...
spring-2015-fashion-trends-google) tell us about the status of the trends floated by the fashion. clothing articles. There is a steady rise in the consumption of styles like waist trainer, jogger ...
2 List of Research Topics On Fashion. 2.1 Fast Fashion Research Questions. 2.2 Sustainable Fashion Topics To Write About. 2.3 Ethical Fashion Essay Topics. 2.4 Topics about Fashion Designers. 2.5 Fashion Brands. 2.6 Business of Fashion. 2.7 History of Fashion Topics to Research. Fashion is a dynamic and ever-evolving field, blending creativity ...
IJNRD2306221 International Journal of Novel Research and Development (www.ijnrd.org) c174 The Impact of Sustainable Fashion in India: Challenges & Solutions Assistant Professor Khushpreet Kaur Guru Kashi University, Talwandi Sabo Abstract This paper elaborates about the impact of sustainable fashion in India and challenges faced by retailers while
Marketresearch.com Market Research Reports & Industry Analysis: A veritable font of information about the fashion and apparel industry, this site lets you search and filter to find general industry reports and more specific reports that pertain to your niche or sub-sector.; McKinsey's State of Fashion Annual Report: A trusted global consulting group, McKinsey publishes a free annual report ...
Using Muji brand clothing as the empirical research object, this paper seeks to investigate the important factors and consumer preferences in purchasing sustainable clothing. ... Such a study has strong implications for industry 4.0 research in the future. To reduce environmental pollution and resource waste in manufacturing, it is important to ...
Demand forecasting is a crucial task for the fashion industry, as it affects various aspects of the supply chain and the market. This article reviews the current literature on demand forecasting methods, challenges, and applications in the fashion industry, and provides insights for future research directions.
Fashion Industry: A Resource Guide. Resources for those studying the business aspects of the fashion and apparel industry. Burdine's Department Store, Miami Beach, 1953. Gottscho-Schleisner Collection, Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. This guide represents a selection of the many resources in the Library of Congress that may ...
Here's a list of creative fashion research topics for you to get inspired. The evolution of fashion from the 1920s to the present. The impact of royal figures on fashion trends throughout history. Cross-cultural influences in fashion: East meets West. The role of fashion in the feminist movement.
(Reuters) -U.S. auto dealers grappled with a cyber attack-led ongoing software outage on Monday, with some reverting to manual paperwork as car industry technology provider CDK worked to restore ...
The fashion industry can be re-organized to bring about structural changes that will ensure a renewed pattern of production and consumption more aligned to the needs of the environment at large. 2 Given its global relevance, the fashion and lifestyle industries are uniquely positioned to collaborate and engage with the Sustainable Development ...
Get white paper. Take preventative measures against network degradation. "With service-centric assurance and granular visibility we can prevent degradations, automate actions for improvements, and better communicate with our customers." Mahesh Anjan, Senior Product Technology Executive. AT&T. Watch webinar on demand.